It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
‘Dragon man’ skull reveals new branch of family tree MORE CLOSELY RELATED to modern humans THAN NEANDERTHALS
The researchers believe the skull belonged to a male, about 50 years old, who would have been an impressive physical specimen.
“I prefer to call it Homo daliensis, but it’s not a big deal,” he said. “The important thing is the third lineage of later humans that are separate from Neanderthals and separate from Homo sapiens.” Details are published in three papers in The Innovation.
Whatever the name, one possibility is that the Harbin skull is Denisovan, a mysterious group of extinct humans known largely from DNA and bone fragments recovered from Siberia. “Certainly this specimen could be Denisovan but we have to be cautious. What we need is much more complete skeletal material of the Denisovans alongside DNA,” Stringer said.
Prof John Hawks, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said the idea of a new lineage of humans was “a provocative claim”, because skulls can look similar even among distant relatives. The skull being Denisovan was a good hypothesis, he added, though he was less keen on a new species name. “I think it’s a bad moment in science to be naming new species among these large-brained humans that all interbred with each other,” he said. “What we are repeatedly finding is that the differences in looks didn’t mean much to these ancient people when it comes to breeding.”
originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: reject
Did they redefine massive ?
IDK
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: dollukka
No idea my dna at all. But ive not had a mosquito bite that i can recall since maybe childhood. They fly away from me. I can part swarms. Dunno why...probably my immune disease.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: reject
Did they redefine massive ?
IDK
Yeah skull is 9 in long not that big
“It is hard to estimate the height, but the massive head should match a HEIGHT HIGHER THAN THE AVERAGE OF MODERN HUMANS.”
originally posted by: reject
a reply to: dragonridr
“It is hard to estimate the height, but the massive head should match a HEIGHT HIGHER THAN THE AVERAGE OF MODERN HUMANS.”