Federal Judge Blocks Farm Relief

A US Federal judge blocked the COVID farm debt relief because it's racist. The plaintiff was a white farmer whose sole disqualifying factor was his race.

“Plaintiff is a White farmer in Jennings, Florida who has qualifying farm loans but is ineligible for debt relief under Section 1005 solely because of his race.” Judge agrees: “Race or ethnicity is the sole, inflexible factor that determines the availability of relief provided by the Government….”

This is the third such government program that has been halted by a federal judge over the government's attempts to blatantly discriminate against whites in favor of various "victim" minorities. You don't see it in the press, but it's happening.

The other programs were coronavirus relief that favored non-whites and women and whit e farmers who were left out of a loan forgiveness program. The loan forgiveness program was even blocked under the same section of the law.

So this is intentional on the part of the administration at this point. You can't discriminate three times and claim you simply made a mistake.

a reply to: ketsuko

Does this mean NO FARMERS get relief from debt caused by the Covid-19 hysteria? Hope not!

If I were the farmer I would relieve myself into the judges gas tank while giving the wavy middle fingers

a reply to: ketsuko

Who didn't see this coming?

Yeah, we all did.

Racism is racism.

Now, what will MSM have to say about this...or will there be only crickets?

Correct me if I'm wrong but can it now be said that the Harris/Biden administration is the most racist one America has seen since....well I really don't know.

Some people think Trump was racist. I still don't get that.

Yet again, "Corn Pop was a bad dude." How is THAT not racist?

Imagine for one brief moment, if Trump had ever said that.

a reply to: ketsuko

This is the thing. Social justice warriors and critical race theory enthusiasts will claim "no one can be racist against white people because they don't have the power to oppress or discriminate against them."

It's an absurd position, as all it takes is programs such as these, or even affirmative action where someone doesn't get a job due to race to have material impact.

I was turned down for a good NYC City Council job, as the final and last candidate, because my friends that worked there said I was basically hired but someone high up vetoed it due to not wanting a white male. The Director who was about to hire me even called to apologize, something I've never seen before. But, I was a single father who had put myself through grad school, was highly qualified, had gone through three panel interviews and provided a portfolio, and needed a job desperately too. It was real material impact.

a reply to: EdisonintheFM

Since Andrew Jackson, who created the Trail of Tears...oh, and the modern Democratic Party as well.

a reply to: ketsuko

All this race crap is being perpetuated by the far left. They purposely divide people. The only good thing is that more people are waking up. The blacks are making many videos standing up against the critical race theory being taught in schools. They are teaching their kids to work hard to get somewhere in life and tell them that the whites are not the oppressors and the blacks are not oppressed.

If one is to be employed somewhere, it should be on merit, not race or gender. Period!

Denying someone Federal aide because of their color is racist. I see that the people who are denying federal aide to anyone because of their color are breaking discrimination laws. I think that these kind of officials are trying to force division of the races in this country by doing stuff like this. They are forcing people to take sides.

Farming is hard and dangerous work, we should support farmers in this country, they are essential workers and the businesses are essential businesses.

a reply to: ketsuko

Wasn't this exactly how the relief was sold? If I recall, it was intended for minority farmers?

Not saying it's right but why is anyone shocked? The intended recipient of this money was for minorities.

If this was ruled on by a judge, there would be public record. Can you link the docket or legal identifier/case?

originally posted by: TXRabbit
If this was ruled on by a judge, there would be public record. Can you link the docket or legal identifier/case?

The case has yet to be fully tried. This was an injunction granted.

Also, it's clear you did not bother to click the linkie. That information is provided: a link to both the Reuters story on it and a link to the Court Order.

a reply to: TXRabbit

It’s in the op if you scroll down even citing all the sub sections and all that jazz that are going to be challenged

a reply to: Ahabstar

I've never actually looked into the democrat or republican parties.

I know both parties are stained but it seems to me the democrat party has been more racism attached to it than the republican party does.

I was always under the impression the "man" keeping certain minorities down was a republican.

With MSM and SM platforms controlling and manipulating information, will the truth ever be fully exposed?

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
a reply to: ketsuko

Wasn't this exactly how the relief was sold? If I recall, it was intended for minority farmers?

Not saying it's right but why is anyone shocked? The intended recipient of this money was for minorities.

Thats the point, the intention was to be racist. Why shouldn't people be shocked at blatant racism?

a reply to: TXRabbit

Exactly, the idea was racist from the start.

No one could do anything about it until it was put into use and denied to certain people based on nothing but skin color. Disgusting.

When one party has majority(Dems) you can push almost anything through, when could someone have stopped it before someone was affected by it? Once it happened to someone, then the courts can hear it in light of damages and make a ruling.

a reply to: ketsuko

Think this is where a lot of the rhetoric is coming from mate.

From 18:00

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: EdisonintheFM

Since Andrew Jackson, who created the Trail of Tears...oh, and the modern Democratic Party as well.

Do you have any proof. I recall he was for people working for a living and he died in 1845 and was out of political influence before that. The party was also against a Federal Reserve too and was quickly ushered in after he lost influence. Jackson in 1812 along with hero Daniel Boone were fighting Indians of the Eastern Tribes who were scalping and raping everywhere they went. The British at Ft Detroit were paying Tecumseh to start the war against the USA.

It was them or us at that point. Who you gonna pick, your own family or the natives you fought back then to protect your family? Some people can't understand that the men who saved us from being destroyed had to make hard decisions and be fair based on the facts as the were. The fact was Native tribes, thanks to England, became toxic to leave near civilization as it were. The Cherokee got the raw end of that deal, IMO.

a reply to: Justoneman

I would love to see a link explaining that because everything I read about that time showed the Cherokee, had a capital written laws a constitution patterned after ours and were trying to work a deal where they helped defend the country but kept their independence.

Even if what you said was true, how does that excuse the suffering and death of women and children on the trail?

===============================

On topic, GREAT... glad to finally seem some judicial push back on clearly racist policies being put into place by the fed.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Justoneman

I would love to see a link explaining that because everything I read about that time showed the Cherokee, had a capital written laws a constitution patterned after ours and were trying to work a deal where they helped defend the country but kept their independence.

Even if what you said was true, how does that excuse the suffering and death of women and children on the trail?

===============================

On topic, GREAT... glad to finally seem some judicial push back on clearly racist policies being put into place by the fed.

It was about moving a people who where warring against us with intent to win it. Most nations choose genocide when that happens and the losing side ceases to be. Maybe the trail was way better than genocide. There are going to be winners and losers are the simple facts.