posted on Jun, 22 2021 @ 03:07 PM
a reply to:
Havamal
I genuinely believe that kids, and even adults coming from a place of ignorance (not a bad word!), have
exceptionally valuable input. Some of
the best ideas, refinements, and input I have ever received pertaining to my own work has come from people (adults or kids) that didnt really know
anything about it.
Where we might differ is that in that circumstance by the pond, I probably would have "banned" all sources of information (internet, books, etc) and
encouraged them to explore it directly for themselves using the general premises of the scientific method. Then, when they had some basic working
hypotheses and foundations, those assumptions would be tested and eventually compared to sources on the internet, books, etc.
With literally billions of iterations of "human," who is to say which one is correct? I have to imagine it comes down to the individual in question..
But I do believe that when neurological structures are being formed in childhood, that it would be beneficial to focus on how to actually learn and
explore these things personally and directly.
Even just in the case of the cake-a-pults, we might even end up seeing a kid come up with something that shakes the foundation of the event, or maybe
even the world. Inspiration and innovation can come from the most peculiar places! All merely because we encouraged massive innate creativity directed
through the concepts of the scientific method, but without boundaries or constraints on the final product/results.
In a sense, I believe common core education tries to somewhat go in this direction.. But I feel it utterly fails in some very critical ways.