are we using alien tech

a reply to: dandandat2

The Lockheed Compact Fusion Reactor will be that thing. And I am pretty certain that they already have one.

That is just the beginning.

As a conspiracy theory, wonder what or where that tech leads.

I ask, why do we not see as many UAPs as we used to?? (My answer is: we have BBT running surveillance and They seen duty bound to stay hidden).

a reply to: saskwatch Yes. Beyond a shadow of a doubt. My dad used to work at Los Alamos and my mom was in charge of Defense Programs for DOE. You'd be shocked at things I heard in passing growing up about xenotech.

a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

2014 they were talking about being on the threshold of announcing miniaturized fusion reactors, shortly after it was said to be in a 2020 time frame to hit the public sector in the size of a dump truck...then to quote dr.jones...whoosh it was gone...back to ITER.

It could have been bluster...but why would you make the claim?, and in just 4-5 years? No mention in the press today about it, its like it all just vanished.

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: LABTECH767

There are story's about the crash at Roswell which include Integrated circuits, fibre optic's etc so?.

Yes , and all was in research BEFORE Roswell .
And it is fiber , not fibre .

Annoying, learn to spell will you it is Centre and Fibre and Colour.

Colonial revisionism at it's worse, hahaha

Seriously Not for this thread but you do know why it is the correct spelling don't you, NORMAN FRENCH and OLD Anglo Saxon English were mixed together to give you modern English, both sides of the Atlantic spell slightly differently because there was actually NO Standardized way of spelling for a very long time and it only ever really came about when Dictionary's were invented, so we over in Blighty have Legacy Spelling, most kid's want to spell it the way you do but are corrected by well meaning English teachers (English Teachers teaching ENGLISH ENGLISH) but in the States you spell it PHONETICALLY that is how it sound's (not everything of course).

So in fact it is BOTH Fibre and Fiber (how it sounds), Centre and Center (how it's sounds) and Colour and Color (meh - not actually a word I believe just a meme I picked up somewhere, terrible of me I know - kind of pronounced both ways though actually most people pronounce the end of the word as Ore or Oar - Oar is an odd one, a Boat Ore and Boat another old English spelling it is Boat not Bote - though some people may read that as botty - and you do spell it the same so are not spelling everything phonetically of course).

It's not only Alphabets many technical symbols used in things like Electronics and engineering etc can vary, Circuit Diagram Resistor symbols for example a Zig Zag Line or a Box both mean the same thing a resistor (standardization has come a long way but go back a little further and it was also imperial vs metric).

Now I will concede my Grammar is pretty bad but I know how to spell Colour, Fibre and Centre and it really annoys some folks that have this kind of OCD when they are faced with the fact THEY are spelling it wrong OR are they - no both are correct.


Hey as for semi conductors, we can trace them back as far as 1874.

Fibre Optics, they claim they were invented in 1956 which would of course about nine years after the Roswell incident BUT in all likelihood the principle was already known if not implemented until that point though let's be fair it is an odd one as we had no actual practical application for the technology for a good while after it was invented?.

a reply to: LABTECH767

Annoying, learn to spell will you it is Centre and Fibre and Colour. Colonial revisionism at it's worse, hahaha

Fibre is exclusively used today to describe the stuff senior citizens need for better bowel movements.

originally posted by: xuserdefined
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF

2014 they were talking about being on the threshold of announcing miniaturized fusion reactors, shortly after it was said to be in a 2020 time frame to hit the public sector in the size of a dump truck...then to quote dr.jones...whoosh it was gone...back to ITER.

It could have been bluster...but why would you make the claim?, and in just 4-5 years? No mention in the press today about it, its like it all just vanished.

One word, Control.

If you let people have cheap limitless energy it frees them, those whom want to control want to enslave not to free.

Economics chains are used to bind, regular bill's force you to work more than you would have too, wages kept low make you work more than you would have to, you have less children because you have less time for them, those in control get richer and more powerful as you get poorer and less powerful and soon you are there property.

So there are suppressed technology's that would have set people and economy's free, alternatives to petrochemicals but the petrochemical industry was one of the ways of controlling not only nations but the world so suppressing these often superior technology's was something that was destined to happen once oil became ubiquitous, the elite had so much of there wealth in the oil industry that these technology's were also a threat to that.

And worse most of this happened without any plan, it just happened, hiding those technology's, suppressing patent's and buying up and shelving inventions because quite infamous.

a reply to: Gothmog

Go on I dare you, do a search for both Fibre optics and Fiber Optic's and the reason Fibre is used in reference to plant FIBRE is because someone in the US food industry did not get your memo about it not being correct.

a reply to: PurpleSun

If you could shock us accordingly via an OP, that would be great.


I suspect a lot of people here know a lot more than they let on but nobody wants to share.

Everybody just hangs around hoping for others to spill some incredible beans.

Beans for the poor, milawd?

a reply to: Baddogma

The technology questions are many. Some things with no clear evolution just seem to appear ...

That is just ignorance. Any modern technology I bothered to learn about had a traceable evolution and origin. I am not aware of anything that just appeared out of nowhere.

originally posted by: ColoradoTemplar
If evolution is correct then................why did humans lose the hair on their bodies only to require humans to wear clothes? it doesnt make sense.

Just look at pigs they are all pink and hairless as long as they are in a pin.

Take any of those little pink piggies and let them roam the woods for a few months and they are covered in course thick hair.

a reply to: saskwatch

The transistor should be the “smoking gun” if anything. From rubbing two sticks together to start a fire to a butane torch… uh, sure, it was a “coincidence” that Roswell happened only a year before that “discovery”

A patent for a Transistor was first filed in 1925 by Julius Edgar Lilienfeld. That was 22 years before Roswell.

a reply to: moebius

"Some things with no clear evolution just seem to appear ... "

That is just ignorance. Any modern technology I bothered to learn about had a traceable evolution and origin. I am not aware of anything that just appeared out of nowhere.

Yeah, I used to agree with your majority stance and my statement was lazy ... but off the top of my weary head I'd offer up microwave ovens.

Does the cooking peanut bar in a pocket (or sandwich on a console) really make sense... really? A cute story, but c'mon.

I used to think similarly as to chains of development and agree that ignorance pervades the subject, along with a lot of deliberate noise. But after some years of attention ...and perhaps a sighting or two, then the weight of consistent, supported testimony from serious people breaks through the normalcy bias and the serfdom that most of us inhabit is all that's left.

I'd be delighted to be wrong about the levels of deception we are subject to. I fear I underestimate it.

a reply to: moebius

Exactly.

People's ignorance of technology history is what allows the idea of Alien tech to keep on living.

I have yet to see any tech for which we don't have a earthly explanation.

a reply to: saskwatch
Just for fun, since no one has mentioned it thus far. Wasn't it Werner Von Braun who said "We had help" when asked where the Nazi's got all their knowledge? Rumor is he briefly looked up toward the sky as he said it.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: moebius

Exactly.

People's ignorance of technology history is what allows the idea of Alien tech to keep on living.

I have yet to see any tech for which we don't have a earthly explanation.

C'mon Armap. You know they always make up a back story to keep the commoners from figuring out what's really happening.

originally posted by: Baddogma
Yeah, I used to agree with your majority stance and my statement was lazy ... but off the top of my weary head I'd offer up microwave ovens.

Microwave ovens use something that has been known for a long time, if you get to close to an active antenna you will get "cooked".

originally posted by: saskwatch
and dont know about it? according to col corso we are, this story for me began in the late 90s, we just had the varghina and phoenix lights cases and up pops col corso with the story that he personally seeded alien tech to industry back in 61 and over the next several decades we had certain products enter the market place such as the computer chip and intergrated circuits and transitors, all types of lasers such as medical uses and weapons useage, as well as night vision capability and fiber optics etc., and when i heard this i thought it makes sense because it seemed to come out of nowhere and to some extent were still trying to learn from it and trying to perfect it to this day

since then other things started to make itself known such as darpa took credit for developing alot of these products but did the original idea or know how come from the ufo? other info started to come out such as nano tech or miniturization, brain wave interface which was because the ets had headbands on that helped them control their ships with brain waves or thoughts, they seem to be highly telepathic as well so they may be able to recieve ones thoughts, prayers, and or meditative thoughts, btw if you try to contact them maybe use a bunch of infrared cameras in case they try sneaking up on you with their cloaking game, also use extreme caution as this is a relatively new field of study imo, other info that came out was atoms such as atomic engines or power plants, atomic alignment etc., as well as metamaterials and lets not forget quantum physics and ai

so as you can tell our industry has learned alot but probably only half of what we could have if it wasnt for the secrecy and compartmentilization, i mean i can understand maybe the first 20 years or so of secrecy like hey some of these lights in the sky belong to advanced civilizations observing us hows my makeup kind of thing but then they should have started the education process immediately after, imagine where wed be now? yeah your right they might of did the right thing but who knows

maybe all thats wrong, maybe there is super geniuses among us that are creating tech that they dont even know what its capable of that we have to wait 40 or 50 years to see what its capable of? i doubt it though but what do yall think? also anybody else shocked that so called smart people and "scientists" arent touching the uaps with a 10 ft pole, why do you think that is as one of the questions of the day?

Short answer is simply yes. And that applies for many things in many fields. After the Roswell and subsequent craft retrivals we quite quickly had silicon technology and fiber optics and other materials that we were able to reproduce or reproduce close enough to get the same or similar effects.

a reply to: ArMaP

Microwave Ovens use a " Cavity Magnetron ". Also used in Radar, which we know has been around long before Roswell.

a reply to: whyamIhere

I believe I read that archeologists speculated we spent a lot of time in the water at some point in time. With body fat(blubber) replacing fur.

originally posted by: ColoradoTemplar
If evolution is correct then................why did humans lose the hair on their bodies only to require humans to wear clothes? it doesnt make sense.

We didn't loose the hair on our bodies, it's just thinner and shorter than the hair on other mammals' bodies.

And we only need clothes on colder climates, there are many places on Earth where we do not need any thing to protect us from the cold.