Congress to receive Pentagon UFO report TODAY

a reply to: Sublant

NORAD said they could do it, in '93.

Not sure why they'd lie about their radar capability like that, for a documentary on the Cheyenne Mountain bunker.

Well…today is a week away from UFO D-Day Friday

After all that’s been presented since the release of the Navy video’s and mandate to produce a report both classified and unclassified……I have two prominent standouts.

On the technology side….the one Navy video shot in the Atlantic. One of the crew mentions “Fleet” seen on a separate AESA radar display in the cockpit, but not shown as part of that particular video. In this case, I favor the aircraft AESA radar in the nose cone, to be the most compelling “wow” factor, and not just the single object shown on the IR display as shown below….



When a Navy officer describes what he see’s on the radar display as a “Fleet” using that precise word in context…. He’s not seeing one, two, or three targets….he is seeing many targets to quantify using the word “Fleet” as oppose to “group” “some” “few” or a “couple”. A fleet of these objects would definitely be a concern, at least for the military.

Maybe it’s been discussed and I missed reading the post(s)….but it seems, much of what’s being discussed about the vids are about the single objects shown on IR display’s …… nothing in discussions, has been zeroed in on the audio where the word “Fleet” is used on that Atlantic video.

As a UFO buff and ex-navy person, the word “Fleet” draws my attention when used by military personnel.

As for when the “Fleet” is picked up on the AESA Radar as mentioned by the cockpit crew member…..it’s been a good aircraft radar for the navy, produced by Raytheon. I don’t know what revision radar was used when the vid was shot, but it was an AESA

Here’s some info on their current revision…

“ Now in full rate production for the U.S. Navy and Royal Australian Air Force, the APG-79 demonstrates reliability, image resolution, and targeting and tracking range significantly greater than that of the previous mechanically scanned array F/A-18 radar.”

Source: www.raytheonintelligenceandspace.com...

Bottom line….using the word “Fleet” denotes some gravity and seriousness to the whole situation.
______________________________________________________________________
On the Political side…..after the classified briefing, it was reported:

“A group of senior American politicians have warned that UFOs pose “national security concerns” after getting a confidential briefing”…….”several said they are deeply worried about the findings.”

To that…I defer to my theological thoughts….to what was prophesied long ago and written in my signature block below.

Next Friday will be a day to remember (if the report is not delayed)

originally posted by: Mantiss2021

originally posted by: vlawde
Take this with a grain of salt, considering the source

Rep. Andre Carson will chair a classified briefing about unidentified aerial phenomena which will be conducted by US Navy and FBI officials.

The lawmaker said the briefing was a “significant and timely topic” amid growing concerns that unidentified aerial phenomena pose a national security risk to America.

one Rep says alien craft ARE from deep space

Speculation is there may be 'leaks' from this (assuming this isn't bogus)

www.the-sun.com...

Recommendation:


Watch the stock market for any unusual activity over the next C t few days leading up to the public release of the official report.

Good news or bad, we should expect "those in the know", who do not have to abide like the rest of us by "insider trading restrictions ", will want to be on the right financial side of this issue.

Remember, just prior to COVID19 becoming recognized as a pandemic, some members of Congress were briefed on the potential threat posed by the virus. It was later learned that some of them then used that knowledge to adjust their stock portfolios.


Actions often speak louder than words.

Dow sell theory triggered Friday...

"A Bear market Sell signal is determined in much the same way, but opposite to a Buy Signal. When a Bull market tops and sets back, and the subsequent rally that goes back up (again, over 3%) and falls short of reaching the previous high and then penetrates the recent lows on the next decline as measured by both the Industrial and Transportation Averages, a SELL Signal is generated indicating a Bear market. This is the must usual SELL signal (S-1)"

thedowtheory.com...

originally posted by: Archivalist
a reply to: Sublant

NORAD said they could do it, in '93.

Not sure why they'd lie about their radar capability like that, for a documentary on the Cheyenne Mountain bunker.

You mean the North American Aerospace Defense Command? How did that work out on Sept. 11?

Reality is not the movies.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I'm curious where everyone is coming up with 6/25 as the day it'll be released. I haven't seen anything official, just speculation

Hi,

The whole report will come down to insinuating at needing more research. But the good part is an acknowledgement from hight end.

Somewhat Thread Related.

The Tic-Tac UFO spotted hovering over England!

Source: www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: carewemust


You also posted it on the Celltyspecific thread so I saw. Hmmm.

originally posted by: vlawde
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I'm curious where everyone is coming up with 6/25 as the day it'll be released. I haven't seen anything official, just speculation

Source: nymag.com...

What Can We Expect From the Pentagon’s UFO Report?

“When exactly will the report be made public?

The legislation President Trump signed on December 27 said intelligence officials should submit their report within 180 days, which would fall in late June. But as the Washington Post reported, it may not arrive on time:

Two factors might delay the report’s release: Agencies have missed similar congressional reporting deadlines in the past; and the provision is not technically binding, as the language was included in the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on the bill, not the bill itself.

“In other words, it isn’t statute, but the agencies/departments generally treat report language as bill language,” said one senior Senate aide familiar with the legislation.”