Good news on Ivermectin

Yea !!!!!

Big-Pharma™, to the rescue against our supposed oppressors : Big-Pharma™ !

Now we can 'kill' supposedly non-living things, with a drug meant to kill the weeds, in our garden gut-flora !

Nobody knows how or why it supposedly works, but : yea Big-Pharma™ !

Parasite B-Gone™ !

a reply to: AaarghZombies

More good news, Israel has completed an interesting study on Ivermectin and transmission.

To assess whether ivermectin can shorten the viral shedding in patients at an early-stage of COVID-19 infection

My complaint here would be the dose is on the low side, FLCCC.org recommends a higher amount.

Study description...taken from John Campbell youtube description...> youtu.be...

Double blinded randomized control trial

Patients receiving ivermectin 0·2 mg/kg for 3 days vs placebo

Non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients

RT-PCR, recruitment and then every two days

Primary endpoint was reduction of viral-load on the 6th day

As reflected by Ct level more than 30 (non-infectious level)

Primary outcome was supported by determination of viral culture viability

Results

N = 89

Ivermectin group, 47

Placebo group, 42

Females, 21·6%

Asymptomatic at recruitment, 16.8%

Symptomatic, 83%

On day 6

Ivermectin group

34 out of 47 (72%) reached the endpoint, (non-infectious level)

Placebo group

21 out of 42 (50%) reached the endpoint, (non-infectious level)

Odds of a negative test at day 6 was 2.62 time higher in the ivermectin group

Also

Ivermectin group, cultures at days 2 to 6 were positive in 3/23 (13·0%)

Placebo group, cultures at days 2 to 6 were positive in 14/29 (48·2%)

(p=0·008)

3 hospitalisations, 3 in the placebo group

Diarrhoea, 2 and 1

No other adverse effects were reported

Conclusions

There were significantly lower viral loads and viable cultures in the ivermectin group, which could lead to shortening isolation time in these patients.

Dr. Pierre Kory testifies to senate committee

It has been a long, hard fight trying to get some common sense on the covid issues. The NIH has restricted the use of Ivermectin for covid to clinical studies only since April 2020. Dr. Pierre Kory testified at the federal senate back in December 2020 saying there is enough clinical data to safely and effectively use this medication for covid, yet the NIH is still resistant.

With what has been coming out with the Fauci emails from January 2020, cannot say I am surprised. Don't see much change happening at the NIH until Fauci is Fired.

C19IVERMECTIN.COM...

www.cnbc.com...

KEY POINTS
The U.S. is investing $3.2 billion to advance the development of antiviral pills to treat Covid-19 and other viruses that have pandemic potential, the Biden administration announced Thursday.
The new program – called the Antiviral Program for Pandemics – is a "whole-of-government effort" that will speed up clinical trials of promising drug candidates and develop next-generation treatment, Dr. Anthony Fauci said.

Can someone please inform Mr. Fauci of Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory, would you be so kind?



reply to: kwakakev

originally posted by: Dr UAE
a reply to: tanstaafl

And if Trump had learned about Ivermectin when he did Hyroxy, I'm sure he'd have come to the same conclusion.

you do realize that they would have grilled, boiled and fried him for it, nothing came out of his mouth that would have been acceptable

If Trump said nothing he'd be lambasted for being ignorant.

If Trump said a one-liner that was truth, he'd be lambasted for repeating a rumor all the while being ignorant and stupid of the whole story.

If Trump told the whole truth, he'd be slaughtered for being a racist, not qualified to give an opinion on anything, ignorant, stupid, etc.

See the narrative?

It doesn't matter what Trump says or when, what is not said, not soon enough, not detailed enough, too detailed, too soon, too late, not this, not that, on and on, all negativity without any specific evidence to support any of the comments.

a reply to: tkwasny

In that case Trump should ignore the haters and call it as he sees it. That is what got him in the job in the first place.

a reply to: UnRepentantHarlequin

Can someone please inform Mr. Fauci of Ivermectin?

He already knows. Fauci is more a doctor that looks after the health of the pharmaceutical companies. There is no money in Ivermectin.

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: UnRepentantHarlequin

Can someone please inform Mr. Fauci of Ivermectin?

There is no money in Ivermectin.

While there is certainly more money in the 'jab', Ivermectin may be increasing in (monetary) value.

My PC doctor prescribed Ivermectin a couple of months back, seemed to prefer it over the vaccine. So, I've been buying it since.

Between May and June of this yea the cost of Ivermectin has gone up 60% (at Walmart), I don't know how much increase I will see for June, but I'm sure there will be some.

Be that as it may, I think I prefer paying for Ivermectin over any 'free' vaccine, my only question is; "what are the affects of taking Ivermectin long term?"

a reply to: Jimy718

You should only keep taking it if you are around people with Covid, otherwise its the usual 5-10 days as with other antivirals. It has a high safety profile. Here is a study that references other studies on its safety (Doses up to 10 times the approved limit are well tolerated by healthy volunteers. Adverse reactions are few and usually mild.)

Effect of Ivermectin on Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes Fed on Humans: The Potential of Oral Insecticides in Malaria Control

a reply to: Dae

I'm taking as my Doctor prescribed; 12mg every week, on the same day...should be nearly as good as the jab, with the drawback that I need a "booster" every week.

Analysis of test sticks from surface testing in the Slovak Republic -confirmation of genocide.

The analysis was performed in the months November 2020 to March 2021 on test sticks in sets. SD Biosensor, Abbott and Nadal in an unnamed hospital laboratory from Bratislava, Slovakia. The test swabs were from the sets used in surface testing in Slovakia and in hospitals.

This study does present some good & bad news when it comes to Ivermectin and puts a whole new spin on why there is such a massive campaign to discredit and neglect the benefits of Ivermectin.

The good news is that anti parasite proprieties of Ivermectin can impend the crystal growing structures of hydrogel. I guess the bad news is that this drug disrupts the nano tech takeover of humanity. With something like this going on in the background it does help explain why there has been such pressure to silence Ivermectin.

The lack of money by having an expired patient is part of it, pretending there are no treatments for covid helped get the Emergency Use Authorization for the Vaxx through. Now the rabbit hole looks so much deeper and even more nefarious as the battlefield has moved to the biological and nano tech scale.

Another Meta-analysis of 15 trials published 17 June 21. Imagine ignoring this much evidence. None of the vaccines are 100%, we need treatments.

Conclusions:

Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection

originally posted by: viviantzamis
a reply to: viviantzamis

this is the title of the article April 4 2020
Coronavirus Australia: Ivermectin, Anti-parasitic drug kills COVID-19 in lab

Bleach kills covid in a lab, As does Alcohol.

PURSUING TRUTH IN COVID DRUG TREATMENT AMID A CENSORED MEDIA LANDSCAPE

The death rate from COVID-19 is dramatically low at United Memorial Medical Center in Houston, TX compared to other hospitals across the nation and the world. Despite Dr. Joseph Varon's popularity on TV, news personalities avoid questions of why he's having success treating his patients. As it turns out, he's using drugs the WHO and CDC recommend against.

IVERMECTIN IS #1. META ANALYSIS NOW PUBLISHED AND ONLINE. #1 COVID TREATMENT

Now the authorities have all they need to APPROVE IVERMECTIN IMMEDIATELY. The meta analysis is now online on The American Journal of Therapeutics. Covid can beaten. Ivermectin is nr 1. It’s #1 for efficacy, it’s #1 for safety and it’s #1 for cost. It should be at the top of the list for all available covid treatments. Thank you to everyone who had been standing up for Ivermectin. When you stand up for Ivermectin, you’re standing up for the truth. - Dr Tess Lawrie, Director of The Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy

American Journal of Therapeutics

telegram source

It seems that the reason that HCQ and IVM have not been used and have been suppressed boils down to the "Commercial in confidence" clauses in the contracts with Pfizer etc.
Bottom line is our politicians have signed contracts which guarantees a certain quantity of the vaccines will be bought no matter what- and they will be answerable to the electorates for the waste of money.

Back to the situation in Australia- most rugs can be prescribed off label- but will not be subsidised for off label prescription.
To get Ivermectin ON LABEL for covid, an application has to be sponsored through the Therapeutic Goods Agency.

Now each state can make additional rules and they often do with "controversial" medications, like stimulants for ADHD, and that is what has happened to HCQ in Queensland.

I do not know what recourse we have for the Queensland situation, but I understand that the Premier has additional financial conflicts of interest which should be explored.

a reply to: MindBody

they will be answerable to the electorates for the waste of money.

It does look to be part of the problem. Personally I would rather waste some money than waste away the population when it comes to being answerable. The conflicts of interest going on in the government and administrator roles looks huge. Scomo has big ties with the vax industry bringing in No Jab, No Pay a few years ago.

Suppressing these treatments helped pass the emergency use authorization. Now there is a big push to stop any vaccination hesitancy as some want the goal of 100% vaccinated. If the government can reach 80% it will help them force the vaccination passport. The state boarders are already getting hit hard with this agenda.

With the results that are leaking out through the suppression around the vax, it does look like the Georgia Guidestone agenda is at play. Will take a few years to take hold with the slow kill tricks going on.

originally posted by: kwakakev

telegram source

Is that per 100,000? COVID vaccine is what 3 or 4 billion total now? Is that 4812 out of that number? BTW where did that 4812 come from?