100 Trillion Dollar Bankster Climate Swindle?

Thought this was an important (and overlooked) article with some pretty fascinating info for those who like reading about this sort of thing.

Also found it interesting how the usual suspects tend to pop up time and time again.

Now For The 100 Trillion Dollar Bankster Climate Swindle…

The heart of the issue (for those who need it elaborated) is this: the future of $90 trillion of energy infrastructure investments and the $1 trillion green bond market and the multi-trillion dollar carbon trading market and the $391 billion (and growing) climate finance industry hangs in the balance.

Of course it does. What else explains the convergence of interest in the organizations, structures and mechanisms for global governance that the magical global thermostat narrative affords?

It’s why Enron and Goldman Sachs pioneered the emissions trading swindles (that–surprise, surprise!–are a complete and total fraud from top to bottom).

It’s why General Electric, DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, Pepsi, Siemens, AIG and a host of other Fortune 500/CFR companies joined BP, ConocoPhillips, GM and a host of other oiligarch companies as founding members of the US Climate Action Partnership whose “Blueprint for Legislative Action” became the backbone of the Wall Street-backed Waxman-Markey bill of 2009.

It’s why the Rockefellers and Rothschilds are at the forefront of the climate hysteria.

It’s why over 400 global institutional investors worth over $25 trillion have decided to cash in on the bonanza with their “Investment Platform for Climate Actions.”

Heck, it’s why EDF, Engie, Air France, Renault, BNP Paribas and a host of other oiligarch companies footed 20% of the bill for the Paris conference itself (and why the French government bent over backwards to point out their “green” credentials).

Take just one structural element of the climate swindle: the Green Climate Fund. Never heard of it? Hardly surprising. It’s just the facility through which the UN is expected to be clearing $100 billion in climate funding per year by the end of the decade.


That’s right: $100 billion per year. Every year.


link

For folks interested in 'following the money' there's also a pretty awesome thread below from OnWhiteMars.

Rockefeller - Controlling the Game.

We’ve all heard about Big Oil and their alleged part in Climate Change Politics. But you’d be surprised if you knew what happens behind the scenes.


The Rockefeller's have funded almost everything regarding climate.


Rockefeller - Controlling the Game - lecture by Jacob Nordangård

Also some revealing historical info here about 'the second most important bank you've never heard of' (GEF) and nearly died laughing at this observation concerning Greta Thunberg's trip on the Rothschild superyacht.

Maybe they should get outside once a year and say " wtf" today the weather is different .

a reply to: musicismagic


Yes indeed mate, let's hope they try that.

When it comes to agendas then also wasn't that surprised to learn that the term 'sustainable development' was first popularized by author Gro Harlem Brundtland who wrote it as economic policy for David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission (of which she was a member).

Money and control. Been obvious from the start. None it actually helps the environment. Some kid invents a machine that cleans tons of plastic from the ocean every day. Another guy plants an entire rain forest by himself. Meanwhile the world richest people and governments fly private jets all over the world for meetings and trade carbon "Credits".

If you think that's bad, wait till you hear about unregulated derivatives.

Pure stupid !
Climate Change is because of human's actions and activities.
It has nothing to do with CO2

originally posted by: jjkenobi

Money and control. Been obvious from the start.

Thanks for the reply Kenobi and do think a good case can be made for the environmental movement being 'usurped' by the very same financial interests campaigners think they are fighting against.

Posted this documentary on another thread but also thought it was very relevant on this one.



Why Big Oil Conquered The World

Following on from this description of the 4th World Wilderness Congress..

Sound too cartoonish? Well, it really happened. Only it wasn't a secret bunker in an undisclosed location, but the 4th World Wilderness Congress that took place in Denver, Colorado, in 1987. The evil henchmen was David Lang, a banker from Montreal. The head villain was Edmund de Rothschild. He was introduced by none other than the ubiquitous super-gopher / Rockefeller protege / "environmentalist" Maurice Strong. Also in attendance at the meeting: David Rockefeller himself, Secretary of State James A. Baker, international banker and Rothschild associate Michael Sweatman, and a host of World Bank members, foreign bankers and international delegates who all converged on Colorado for the strangest "wilderness" conference ever assembled. And we are only fortunate enough to know about this meeting because of an extraordinarily unlikely series of accidents that happened to put the right man in the right place at the right time to observe, record and report on it.

The (Second) Most Important Bank You've Never Heard Of

It's a rare video (because they keep taking it down) but here's a VHS copy of it.

Some outrageous remarks being made including referring to everyone as "The cannon fodder which populate the earth".



Video:

UNCED EARTH SUMMIT BY GEORGE HUNT 1992 (EN, VHS VIDEOTAPE - ORIGINAL)

originally posted by: monkeyluv

If you think that's bad, wait till you hear about unregulated derivatives.

Yes Monkeyluv did see Kwakakev's comments over on another thread.

Would you say it's a fair assessment?

The derivatives market is currently valued in the quadrillions of dollars (more money than what is in the rest of the world), while having no real assets. Basically it is just a big casino, some also describe it as a pyramid scheme in the way it is managed.

link

There's also 21 trillion reasons to find this story pretty tragic

Some classic Rockefeller funded precision propaganda featuring Maurice Strong, Paul Ehrlich and Laurie Zabin.

Pretty impressive new article from Corbett citing some great links.

Under a “climate lockdown,” governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.



If only those were the ravings of some deluded Greta wannabe in an obscure environmental publication with no relation to power. Unfortunately, these ravings were published by Project Syndicate, which just happens to be funded by (prepare yourself) Goerge Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Google News Initiative among others

link

Full article well worth a read.

Fun times ahead.

Absolute Zero: The Global Agenda Revealed


Their answers should not be surprising to anyone who has been watching the unfolding of the anti-human, anti-life agenda from the release of The Club of Rome's Limits to Growth report in 1972 to the birth of Agenda 21 at the Maurice Strong-led 1992 UN Earth Summit to the roll out of The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in recent years.

Namely, the authors of "Absolute Zero" inform us that:




• All airports in the UK except Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast will close in the next decade and all air traffic will cease by the year 2050.



• All existing forms of blast-furnace production and all existing forms of cement production will be halted by the year 2050, meaning that "the construction industry has to radically change its production process or close" and that buildings will become smaller and much more expensive.



• All naval shipping will cease by the year 2050 (with the possibility of some shipping resuming some time "beyond 2050" when freight ships have been equipped with onboard nuclear power).



• All consumption of beef and lamb will cease by the year 2050 along with all consumption of overseas foods that are not imported by rail (see air traffic and shipping above).



• And, of course, all non-renewable energy production will cease by 2050.

link

More on the 'mechanisms' which are allowing corporations to steal the world's natural resources (global commons).

From NACs to GFANZ, Webb and Corbett break down the latest attempt to monopolize the world's natural resources and how this financial scam represents the next step along the path to the Great Reset, Agenda 2030 and the 4th Industrial Revolution.

Also a pretty relevant one here about BlackRock.

All I have to say anymore is that if an individual accepts this new method of control and tracking, if they don't stand up and fight back, they are an enemy of liberty and thus of me.

The People need to fight back.

This is getting serious.

a reply to: havok



Pretty darn interesting Channel Four documentary below mate.

See 13:00

Video

a reply to: karl 12

...and suddenly setting up this new gas terminal in a nature reserve wasn't unfeasible anymore, because... Russia!

...Several initiatives to import LNG and clean gases have gathered momentum in recent weeks as Germany accelerates efforts to shift away from Russian natural gas supplies and speed up its green transition.

Germany's TES accelerates plan for gas import terminal

So much for green transitions, I'd reckon. What kinda brown is this green supposed to be anyway, douche-olive with a sprinkle of 'seriously pissed'?

"How much green do those people get for shipping greenish gas around the globe to spill some in a nature reserve", I hear you ask. A lot.

So that's why Obama installed a 2500 lb propane tank at his house.

Here we go:


www.corbettreport.com...