DHS Employee Leaks Several Craft Captures

I stacked up three screen caps of the "rubber duck ufo" and did a little Photoshop level-adjustments and sharpening, and this is what I got. It's definitely strange, and it appears that there's a dip or recess in the "body" of the object. It is what it is...just thought I'd contribute this.

originally posted by: SecretKnowledge

originally posted by: DougHole64
How was the department of health and social security able to obtain this footage?

Thats DHS in England.

DHS in America is Dept. Homeland Security

Interesting, that does make this footage far more interesting.

a reply to: Blue Shift

Well, it's a lot easier to take a relatively clear picture of an object when the person can set the distance from the camera and time when the object gets thrown for a staged photo. (although that image that you're showing in the first picture has been heavily processed to get it to look like that)

Sweet "2021" cherry-picked image in order to try and make a point, though.

There used to be images of Polaroid prints of a large triangle craft emerging from the ocean in broad daylight. Its the real deal if you can still see the creased fold in the image. I had 7 saved to an old Seagate HDD that I was unable to recover them from I wish I could show you. They may still be floating around in the WayBackMachine somewhere.

originally posted by: iknowyou

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: SecretKnowledge

I’d fall over from surprise if a video was released that showed actual detail of what they were filming and not an amorphous blob that could be anything.

Cool video though.

If something is clear it becomes identified. Ocams razor. Low quality footage is the only thing that keeps this entire community and it's imagination going.

Yet,

Here you are....weird

a reply to: SecretKnowledge

Think the last one might be Forrest Gump

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: Blue Shift

Well, it's a lot easier to take a relatively clear picture of an object when the person can set the distance from the camera and time when the object gets thrown for a staged photo. (although that image that you're showing in the first picture has been heavily processed to get it to look like that)

Sweet "2021" cherry-picked image in order to try and make a point, though.

It's not even an image. It's just a blue background where I added a little brightness to a few pixels. But thanks for confirming my observation by thinking it's an actual 2021 UFO image. Yeah, that's what they look like these days.

For the middle vid....I’ll say, it’s similar to the “Witch” ufo spotted in Mexico, USA, and England in 2018



The last vid....perhaps a probe? There appears to be a sphere seperated but flying above and in parallel to what’s underneath.

Kind of reminds me of the Probe concept from Star Trek

a reply to: SlapMonkey

The rubber duck analogy crossed my mind too!

In the first segment of the video, the flames of the jet look like a solid part of the jet.

Maybe the rubber duck look-a-like has similar qualities; part of it could be obscured by some form of exhaust?

originally posted by: Klassified
As I have said repeatedly, if the video is bad it's fake. If the video is good, it's fake. I've seen it here at ATS and elsewhere online over and over and over again. I don't think there is a video that will truly convince anyone because technology has rendered images and video almost useless as acceptable evidence.

Which are these DHS videos, bad or good? Not one poster so far said they were fake.

Given how many people have smartphones now that can take video, and they usually have them with them, if there's something interesting which happens over a populated area, we should get multiple videos from multiple different sources, and that should immediately dispel any notion the videos are fake. That's what happened October 24 last year, when articles appeared about videos flooding the internet showing a UFO (or multiple UFOs) over Hawaii.

shaamtimes.net...

Videos of the sighting flooded the internet, with one fuzzy clip shared to YouTube by conspiracy theorist MrMBB333

Nobody seemed to think the videos were fake, nobody, but some people thought the "official explanation" for the UFO was fake.

I don't think the DHS videos in the OP are fake, even though they are sole sourced, but given a lot of their work is done in thinly populated areas, it's very understandable why we don't have multiple videos in this case. The rubber duckie has an interesting shape, so at least it's unusual in that regard, and not the typical distant fuzzy dot.

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
I stacked up three screen caps of the "rubber duck ufo" and did a little Photoshop level-adjustments and sharpening, and this is what I got. It's definitely strange, and it appears that there's a dip or recess in the "body" of the object. It is what it is...just thought I'd contribute this.

Interesting shape, thanks.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

There not fake the first was a bird the other two baloons.

here i found a ufo

www.pinterest.com...

a reply to: SecretKnowledge

Afetr watching the video again im going with the 2nd one, the rubber duck shaped one, looking like something with a net-like thing or maybe a bag hanging from it. Doing what? Collecting insect samples?

The 3rd one i cant get past it looking like someone running.

First one i have no idea.

I saw the light orb object in Virginia 2 nights ago as I was locking my door. At first I thought it was a shooting star and got all gushy, but when it went down it came back up and bounced around the sky over my backyard. I couldn’t/didn’t want to get my phone because I was in awe. a reply to: SecretKnowledge

originally posted by: 2Faced
The last one however, unless there’s more detailed footage out there, looks like it’s not natural or man-made, you’d expect an engine, a heatsignature, wings or propellers etc. None of that’s visible, while conventional aircraft are, in most cases, easily distinguishable from their silhouette. So it’s safe to conclude that it, at least, isn’t a conventional craft.

Yeah, but is it actually moving fast, or is the motion caused by the video parallax of the movement of the plane filming it and the close zoom? That last object could be moving slowly or generally hovering, like a balloon or something.

I'm not saying it is a balloon, but at the same time I'm saying it may not be moving in such a way that would require propulsion.


EDIT TO ADD:

To explain what I mean about video parallax, watch this video between the :15 to :30 to see a great example of it. The stationary head of the statue at the :17 mark and the people on the stairs/platform at the :25 mark seem to really be zooming past the background:

originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People

originally posted by: 2Faced
The last one however, unless there’s more detailed footage out there, looks like it’s not natural or man-made, you’d expect an engine, a heatsignature, wings or propellers etc. None of that’s visible, while conventional aircraft are, in most cases, easily distinguishable from their silhouette. So it’s safe to conclude that it, at least, isn’t a conventional craft.

Yeah, but is it actually moving fast, or is the motion caused by the video parallax of the movement of the plane filming it and the close zoom? That last object could be moving slowly or generally hovering, like a balloon or something.

I'm not saying it is a balloon, but at the same time I'm saying it may not be moving in such a way that would require propulsion.


EDIT TO ADD:

To explain what I mean about video parallax, watch this video between the :15 to :30 to see a great example of it. The stationary head of the statue at the :17 mark and the people on the stairs/platform at the :25 mark seem to really be zooming past the background:

I understand that it could look like the object is traveling much faster than it actually is, and no doubt there’s probably a very simple explanation for what was recorded. Until this day we’ve seen nothing more than the usual, barely distinguishable objects, never any details like a cockpit/bridge, doors, exhaust ports windows, etc.. So whatever it is, we can only speculate what that rubber-ducky shape actually is, unless new detailed information is added.

originally posted by: Blue Shift
It's not even an image. It's just a blue background where I added a little brightness to a few pixels. But thanks for confirming my observation by thinking it's an actual 2021 UFO image. Yeah, that's what they look like these days.

Well, it's still "an image," but semantics aside, what you did was even worse. You took an old, heavily processed photo that it almost unanimously agreed to be a hoax, and then created a fake image (hoax), put them side by side, and tried to make some sort of intelligent point.

It doesn't work. And a simple Google search will show you that there are better images than just things that resemble "a little brightness to a few pixels." And I didn't think that it was a real picture, I just assumed that it was, because yes, sometimes they do look like that, but it's a logical fallacy to assume that all are "hot garbage" because amateur photographers and videographers holding a shaky cell phone don't meet your expectations of what should be.

I should stop assuming that people are trying to be honest when trying to make points, I guess.

Click bait title, just blobs and dots

a reply to: SecretKnowledge

originally posted by: Rob808
Click bait title, just blobs and dots

a reply to: SecretKnowledge

Have to agree, could be anything, a bag, a drone, a bird, CGI, unfortunately like most without proper quality recordings it's almost impossible to work out what it is.

Also, just because it says DHS, how can we prove its real? Those screens are easier to make then filming a bag in the sky