People think, crypto-world is not able to be tracked.

Sorry, I have quite a bit here.. wasn't sure where to put this post, but it is technology oriented.

People believe personal wallets are private and no one but them have access to said wallet. But just on the Bloomberg channel had a statement of recovering the wallet that was used in the Bitcoin crypto hack of pipelines.

If this was the case Paul Abbat would not of been able to track and locate and recover the funds from the hacks of the pipeline.. unless this was a planned hack.

Do you think Democrats are desperate enough to use technology to force another fake win? By forcing shortages of gas, and meats? Only to have it go to a personal wallet locally to make it easy to have a majority amount recovered?

Realistically each wallet is 16 words randomized.. it would take 100s of years to "hack" a wallet. Because these words actually define the wallet itself. Think of it like your bank account number. All you need is the numbers to access it. No routing needed. Which means they would of had to access millions of wallets before they got to the right one. Since there is no guarantee "red spliffy cherry apple foot bangs smile, etc" equals said wallet.



They have started calling the hacking group the "dark side".

Has anyone ever heard of the dark side network?

They are claiming that they have been stalking the US companies for the last year. Do you think the crypto banning(which happened in 2009 by denying it as a currency, then again after the hack despite record gains..) that is starting is to stop people from going to Bitcoin is a way for them to increase their gains before accepting such or a similar?

originally posted by: BlackArrow

... unless this was a planned hack. ...

Duh! Ya think?

I have no doubt that the whole thing was a false flag. They will test these strategies out in sectors before hitting the whole system. The Colonial pipeline "hack". The JBS meat processing system "hack".

Just wait until they perfect their methodologies and hit the entire global financial system and supply chain.
:

a reply to: incoserv

These were hacks, both JBS and Colonial had crap encryption and were ware of the situation. It's a calculated risk on their en and they lost. There are many more besides these two.

a reply to: BlackArrow

Anybody that thinks it's magic privacy money doesn't know much about crypto.

With the exception of the privacy tokens, which will be axed by regulations IMHO unless they decide to use it for their own black money projects, most of the others leave a trail. That's a neat trick I expect them to use. They'll funnel terror money using privacy crypto, subsequently use said terrorists to determine that privacy crypto is used for terror funding, then they'll continue to demonize and confiscate it while still using it to fund their secret wars. They've been tightening the on-roads and off-roads from fiat to crypto, but once it becomes more widely accepted as currency the conversion of crypto to fiat won't be as important.

The whole point of most crypto is to have a record of transactions, among other things. While the surface data may not tell you everything you need to know you can still track it and by using this footprint there's a great deal of information available.

What ban are you talking about after the hack? As far as I know there's been no change in US policy. There have been false reports about bans in China and India, some places have curtailed mining, but not much else that I know of.

These were hacks, both JBS and Colonial had crap encryption and were ware of the situation. It's a calculated risk on their en and they lost. There are many more besides these two.

The fact that they had "crap encryption" and lax security does not mean that these had to be genuine hacks. The point of the exercise was not to see if they could break into the system. I'm pretty sure that that wall has been breached. The point was to disrupt the supply chain and see who small segments of the market would react. Hitting the lowest hanging fruit (i.e., least protected suppliers) would make sense. It'd not raise any red flags in terms of exposing advanced security-breaching measures but it'd have the same effect as breaking a more securely protected organization.

a reply to: BlackArrow

Crypto typically uses a distributed architecture so you can track the packets from source to destination. The trick is finding out who owns the destination wallet. Once you know that you can track all of their transactions by looking at the relevant hash tables.

It's like having an anonymous PO Box, but the mail man remembers every letter than they put in it. Once they've ID the owner of the box they can tie them to the transactions.

a reply to: BlackArrow

"Dark Side"

Did they not used to crack old Amiga/C64 games?

originally posted by: incoserv
The fact that they had "crap encryption" and lax security does not mean that these had to be genuine hacks.

What's a 'not genuine' hack?

By "genuine hack," I mean something that is as was reported; an individual or group of individuals breaking security in order to steal or lock data with some gain (usually financial) in mind.

A non-genuine "hack" would be not as reported in the media, one not carried out by such people but by powerful political entities and the end of which was in reality not actually a means of some material gain. I believe that these they were carried by political powers to the actual end of disrupting supply chains and gauging market and social response. The "hack"[/i] narrative would have been nothing more than a cover story, much like the entire "Covid-19 pandemic" has bee a cover story for the usurpation of basic human rights and national sovereignty.

ETA: This kind of thinking probably gets a fellow on somebody's watch list.

edit on 2021 6 07 by incoserv because: (no reason given)