It starts - forced vaccines coming to a town near you! Bill in NEW YORK has been proposed.

URGENT:AS YOU READ THIS PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO ALL BILLS PASSED IN DEMOCRATIC STATES, THESE ARE POPPING UP ALL OVER THE PLACE. NEW YORK IS JUST THE FIRST ONE CONFIRMED FOUND. SOME OF THEM MAY BE HIDING IN OTHER BILLS


NYsenate.gov

Relates to the removal of cases, contacts and carriers of communicable diseases who are potentially dangerous to the public health

§ 2. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
have become a law. Effective immediately the addition, amendment and/or
repeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of
this act on its effective date are authorized to be made and completed
on or before such date.

As soon as this becomes law, they will begin rounding up those who have not been vaccinated and forcing them into prison where you will be tested and force vaccinated against your will. Those in NEW YORK MUST FIGHT IT! It has been proposed, and is being considered as we speak. PLEASE NY STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOMS!


At this point it does not matter if you are vaccinated or not, rounding people up and forcing experimental treatments on them is worse then SLAVERY, you are LAB RATS with NO RIGHTS.

REMOVAL AND DETENTION OF CASES, CONTACTS AND CARRIERS WHO
ARE OR MAY BE A DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH; OTHER ORDERS. 1. THE PROVISIONS
OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE UTILIZED IN THE EVENT THAT THE GOVERNOR
DECLARES A STATE OF HEALTH EMERGENCY DUE TO AN EPIDEMIC OF ANY COMMUNI-
CABLE DISEASE.
2. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH
OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR
SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE
OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY
POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING
IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE-
GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF
LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH
A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS BY ISSUING A SINGLE ORDER, IDEN-
TIFYING SUCH PERSONS EITHER BY NAME OR BY A REASONABLY SPECIFIC
DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUP BEING DETAINED. SUCH PERSON OR
GROUP OF PERSONS SHALL BE DETAINED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY OR OTHER APPRO-
PRIATE FACILITY OR PREMISES DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER
DELEGEE AND COMPLYING WITH SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION.
3. A PERSON OR GROUP REMOVED OR DETAINED BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR OR
HIS OR HER DELEGEE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE

EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04443-01-1

A. 416 2

DETAINED FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IN SUCH MANNER AS THE DEPARTMENT MAY DIRECT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION.
4. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY INCONSISTENT PROVISION OF THIS SECTION:
(A) A CONFIRMED CASE OR A CARRIER WHO IS DETAINED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVI-
SION TWO OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT CONTINUE TO BE DETAINED AFTER THE
DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THAT SUCH PERSON IS NO LONGER CONTAGIOUS.
(B) A SUSPECTED CASE OR SUSPECTED CARRIER WHO IS DETAINED PURSUANT TO
SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT CONTINUE TO BE DETAINED AFTER
THE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES, WITH THE EXERCISE OF DUE DILIGENCE, THAT SUCH
PERSON IS NOT INFECTED WITH OR HAS NOT BEEN EXPOSED TO SUCH A DISEASE,
OR IF INFECTED WITH OR EXPOSED TO SUCH A DISEASE, NO LONGER IS OR WILL
BECOME CONTAGIOUS.

This means all they have to do is give a description of you or by name, and you will be arrested and detained. Until THEY see fit you are no longer 'contagious'. Which means you have no choice but to take whatever treatment they give you to be 'cleared' for release. Do not forget on this bill they also say "IS OR MAY BE". Which leaves it open to error, and biased arrests.

a reply to: BlackArrow

. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH
OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR
SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE
OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY
POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING
IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE-
GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF
LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH
A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS

So being sick with any disease the governor decides will now be a crime in new York?

a reply to: BlackArrow

Screw that.
1% is not a high mortality rate.

Sounds like it's tree watering time.

a reply to: BlackArrow

F NO. Time to find the lawyers who aren't part of the clown world dictatorship and get those civil rights cases lined up.

They could take political dissidents from a contact list and inject them with whatever they wanted.
Rich coming from an intentional elderly people murderer.
Nice

originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: BlackArrow

. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH
OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR
SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE
OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY
POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING
IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE-
GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF
LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH
A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS

So being sick with any disease the governor decides will now be a crime in new York?

IS OR MAY BE, IS OR MAY BE. There's no IS OR MAY.. they contradict clarity, and yes ANY disease the gov chooses if its deemed contagous, the flu, the cold. Broncitis, strep throat.

a reply to: BlackArrow

A free vaccination site popped up this week near my work, and every day I've passed an empty lot. The first day there was one car in line, the others none.

Too many people are aware of the dangers of joining in mass clinical trials in which data that doesn't show its efficacy is hidden or suppressed.

I don't think this is gonna fly

I don't know who this "Bill" guy is, but he's not rounding me up for jabs without a fight.

a reply to: BlackArrow

This is ridiculous. Do they even have enough detention facilities to accommodate millions of people???

a reply to: BlackArrow

Just double checking to make sure i read that right. I thought it was some insane dystopian worse than 1984 #, just had to make sure.

Imagine being on the ‘side’ that approves of this

Pathetic people they are

How long until thoughts and ideas become reasons for detention? Thoughts that ARE OR MAY BE already in your head. Only a test can tell, and then the treatment...

Yes it's cringy overdramatic, but had I stated the above 12 months earlier, the above would have been cringy overdramatic too.

I saw this movie. It had the guy that played Chef on South Park in it, way back in the 80’s. He was the Duke of New York and drove a Cadillac Fleetwood, I think.

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain
It says up to 60 days or until you are no longer 'contagious' by their standards.

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

Do you remember them taking a list of everyone who supported trump? AOC was asking about that program, and apparently it was in full swing. Everyone on that list could be the first target. So count on high profile targets being the first rounded up. There's no way they are going to make a move on the public until dealing with those that offered us a better way.

But they might, if this crap picks up speed. Biden might EO it. We have no clue what will be the motivation, they could easily lock people away to prevent elections by claiming so and so has this that or the other. They can do a lot of damage just by keeping people locked up until they complete whatever testing, and force injecting they have planned. Only to be found dead later of -insert illness here-.

This is a bad bill that will allow corruption on 100% scale with no way to fight back.

a reply to: BlackArrow

Un-bunch your panties.

This is in committee. Every bill will look very different once it's been through the committee. A bill can say anything. The committee is there to take out what isn't constitutional. I promise this bill will be worded much different once (if) it leaves the committee.

You want to really scare yourself start reading every bill in committee from every state.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Money talks more then the constitution especially when the rules don't apply to you. Remember that.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

"We want to torture you and shave your face off!"
"Don't worry, we're just going to shave your face off!"

ANY type of bs bills against the constitution deserve prison time.
Hell, let's just up it to instant electrocution

Your argument is psychotic.

"Oh, they will change it!"

"It" shouldn't even be being proposed.
Christ

a reply to: BlackArrow

Yes I remember, I am very sensitive to lists of all sorts and what can be done with them. Once such databases or lists are started and nodded as okay, it's just a matter of time until it's abused or misused.

Like our toll collect system. "No, we don't record the licence plates, we process the toll information and it's gone". Fifteen years later they got big evidence with it for a rape crime. Very silent they acknowledged it! Suddenly it's all in storage and useable. It's great they got evidence and routes on the bastard but for what price?

We've been lied to once again and now we know police can and will use this data. It's not that I don't want them to solve crimes though, but what's next, they want to put cameras in my home so that in case this data could be needed, it exists?