It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“If the state prevails in the underlying litigation, Enbridge will face the prospect of having to disgorge to the state all profits it derives from its wrongful use of the easement lands following that date,” Whitmer said in a letter to the company.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Trueman
How dare this young female use her influence in the MSM to call out an unscrupulous oil corporation!
This could even end up costing people a few cents extra to fill up their tank... you can’t get more anti American than that!
originally posted by: JBurns
Hope Canada tells her where to shove it
I truly hate these dirtbags. Fortunately, they are only punishing their own.
Most of us "prepper" conservative types have plenty of fuel to make it work, no matter how long the shortage lasts.
We knew these days were coming. Hence the "preparation" part.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Trueman
How dare this young female use her influence in the MSM to call out an unscrupulous oil corporation!
This could even end up costing people a few cents extra to fill up their tank... you can’t get more anti American than that!
On what authority, FFS?????
“Given this case’s unavoidable foreign-affairs ramifications, federal jurisdiction is not merely permissible but necessary,” Enbridge’s attorneys argue in the Tuesday filing.
It cites four titles from federal statutory law to back up its arguments, including those pertaining to federal court jurisdiction, public lands, shipping and transportation.
The main crux of Enbridge’s argument to remand is that the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), not the state of Michigan, has regulatory authority over Line 5; thus, only PHMSA could order the shutdown or decommissioning of the pipeline.
“Line 5 is operating safely, reliably and is in compliance with the law. The State of Michigan has never presented any concrete evidence to suggest otherwise. The US agency in charge of pipeline safety, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), has confirmed on multiple occasions that the pipelines are fit for service," the company said in a statement.
A spokesperson went on to say that the issue is currently being litigated in federal court, where both parties have been ordered to work with a neutral mediator.
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: Trueman
On what authority, FFS?????
originally posted by: billxam
a reply to: carewemust
You are exactly incorrect! So far there's been twenty.
But guess who controls the people that validate them? And guess what happens to people that start these petitions? In Michigan. Where the state police are at the dear leader's beck and call.
Michigan's good old boy network is run by women, always has been, always will be until the enclaves of SW Michigan and Detroit are depopulated enough. But don't worry, they're invading rural areas bringing their political filth with them.
ballotpedia.org...(2020-2021)
www.mlive.com...
www.change.org...
www.bridgemi.com...
Alone, she's s.o.l.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Looks like a coordinated concerted effort to choke-off oil in North America !!!😧