15 Year Boy Old Dies From Heart Attack From Vaccination !

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

There isnt a single verified report/source for this ... its BS

www.google.com... hrome&ie=UTF-8

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: ATruGod

I said possibly although it is not to be given to those under 16. If it was research related you think there would be other specifications other than random Vaers reporting.

I could go on there now and report a 6, 10 or 100 year old.

Likely a test case....and yes it has been given to many under age 16.

Here is my thread on it.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: rigel4

VAERS DISCLIAMER

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

I wish this had limitations as to who could can report to give it at least some level of credibility...as it stands the comments in threads say this may or may not have happened and we have zero confirmation.
Regardless I appreciate the conversation it generated, even though I am disappointed in the lack of credibility a report like this has.

6700 children in Baltimore alone have already begun getting shots...



That is a graphic from the video in my other thread. The video shows an 8 year old boy getting it....

So, tell me again how those under 16 can't get the shot....

And as usual....prove me wrong with science!

a reply to: Vasa Croe

That is a graphic from the video in my other thread. The video shows an 8 year old boy getting it....

A drawing..um..ok.

I read that the vaccine can chop of your arms; I wonder if there is any validity to this claim. In any regard just on the off chance that its true I won't be getting the vaccine.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Vasa Croe

That is a graphic from the video in my other thread. The video shows an 8 year old boy getting it....

A drawing..um..ok.

Watch the video bud....it is a graphic from the report. The video shows children, specifically an 8 year old, getting the vaccine.

But meh.....reality.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
6700 children in Baltimore alone have already begun getting shots...

That is a graphic from the video in my other thread. The video shows an 8 year old boy getting it....

So, tell me again how those under 16 can't get the shot....

And as usual....prove me wrong with science!

6700? That is alarming; have they all died of a heart attack yet?

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Why would a subject of the trial report to Vaers and wait on an investigation? This may seem simple but I would think as this information is vital it would be required to go through directly to the study, yes?

Anyone can report anything. I can go report to Vaers of receiving the Vax and then state the cause of my death was being mauled by a bear. You literally can report anything you want.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Vasa Croe

That is a graphic from the video in my other thread. The video shows an 8 year old boy getting it....

A drawing..um..ok.

Here...Ill make it easy for you....

a reply to: dandandat2

It just started may 5....how many days should we wait until it is deemed safe?

After all, it is a "vaccine" that still isn't approved and is the very first large scale test of its kind. We only have adult data for 5 or so months right now....

But good on everyone getting the jab....I am happy to wait until I know it is safe.

Those getting it shouldn't care either way....it's a vaccine right? So they're all good.

a reply to: frogs453

Because the vaccines are authorized by EUA, it is required that physicians report deaths following vaccinations.
www.cdc.gov...

Note that this does not mean that the report was filed by a physician. Anyone can file a report, any time they want to.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

So, the parents lied about the child's age?

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70
We should count deaths for the vaccine the same way we did for the disease. Match up death certificates for three months after the vaccination and chalk it up to the vaccination.

Only fair, right?

No WTF is wrong with you?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Why would a subject of the trial report to Vaers and wait on an investigation? This may seem simple but I would think as this information is vital it would be required to go through directly to the study, yes?

Anyone can report anything. I can go report to Vaers of receiving the Vax and then state the cause of my death was being mauled by a bear. You literally can report anything you want.

I'm not correlating the VAERS report with this video....this is simply one city, Baltimore, in one state that already has 6700 children lined up to get the jab. The video is from May 5....no idea when it started but had to be close to that day.

Now....that is one city....in the entire US....one.

Like I have said before.....I am not anti vax. My kids have their shots and get a flu shot every year.

This one is different and there has never been a long term study and never been FDA phase 4 mRNA approved...not a single one....ever.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Vasa Croe

So, the parents lied about the child's age?

Not sure what you mean....the reporter clearly states the boy is 8 in the video.

a reply to: Phage

Yes that is true, although it would be good to know if during research and study any adverse effects are reported on Vaers or another way, guess I could go back through the site to see when reports started and when testing originally started with adults and see if they mesh or if reports came after the vaccine was public.

I would think if the Doctor filled out the Vaers report then the lot # etc would be listed, as I'm sure that would be normal for them to note it on the report and it would be accessible to them to obtain it.

I have seen quite a bit of info on other reports. Lab results, lot numbers, etc.
This report has nothing besides the claim. No other info.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

And the report upon which this thread is based was filed on April 22.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: dandandat2

It just started may 5....how many days should we wait until it is deemed safe?

After all, it is a "vaccine" that still isn't approved and is the very first large scale test of its kind. We only have adult data for 5 or so months right now....

But good on everyone getting the jab....I am happy to wait until I know it is safe.

Those getting it shouldn't care either way....it's a vaccine right? So they're all good.

I agree it should take more than a day to dismiss claims made on the internet that the vaccine can chop off kids arms. And certainly 5 or so months isn't nearly enough time to discount the possibility that adult arms may start to come loose; when your dealing with the first large scale test of an experimental "vaccine" i fear anything might be possible.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Vasa Croe

And the report upon which this thread is based was filed on April 22.

Like I said previously....I have no idea when child tests began. My video was only from Baltimore and aired May 5.

Feel free to point me to when they started in general. I would guess Baltimore was close to one of the first, but based on the phases in the diagram it would logically make sense that 12-15 happened prior to....

If you actually value both sides of this discussion, I would expect you know when and where trials started for those under 16? If not, then neat conjecture!