Immunization Vaccination or Inoculation Choose Your Words Wisely

Here is a situation in which a nurse had declined the vaccine that the hospital she worked for had required for employment. The hospital allowed for medical and religious exemptions if you submitted them by a certain date, but she declined based on her own research and non religious reasoning. They fired her even though she tested for Covid-19 antibodies and had already recovered from the virus.

We Were Constantly Being Pressured” – Texas Nurse Says She Was Harassed and Fired For Refusing Covid-19 Vaccine

“I knew that the date was looming over my head of me to get the vaccine and we were constantly being pressured and pressured,” Michelle Fuentes said.

Houston Methodist announced last month that it would require employees to get the Covid-19 vaccine by June 7.

The hospital allowed for medical and religious exemptions and said the employees would have to submit documentation by May 3.

Fuentes said she’s not against vaccines but she just needed a little more time to research the Covid vaccine and wanted clinical trials to be completed before she made her decision.

That seems reasonable to me, completed clinical trials, that's the way I think about it, it's just common sense really.

Houston Methodist fired Fuentes despite her willingness to wear face masks and show lab results of Covid-19 antibodies since she had already recovered from the virus!

“T cell immunity after natural infection shown to include variants,” according to the study so why would the nurse need to get a vaccine if she was already infected with the virus?

An excellent question, that last one.

In my opinion, she had a "pathogenic immunization" by being infected and recovering. She produced proof in the form of an antibody test. IMO, she had the best "vaccine" you could get, the real live bug.

Source

originally posted by: St Udio
i'm willling but not inspired to call the COVID serum a 'vaccine' as thats the official term used for the
'Jab Juice'


if i continually call the Jab-Juice a Potion or Serum then i might indeed get a 'Jab' of a more deadly Variant of COVID while getting jostled in a subway ride or some such clandestine delivery by a Agent of big-pharma or intel

knowing the difference is to keep it discreet and among those you trust, its not a soap box theater matter imho

As one very interested in human behavior, I cannot help but wonder why Fauci and Pharma and MSM insist upon calling the unapproved drug cocktail a vaccine when it is not a vaccine.

I think there is some meaning to their choice of words.

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: St Udio
i'm willling but not inspired to call the COVID serum a 'vaccine' as thats the official term used for the
'Jab Juice'


if i continually call the Jab-Juice a Potion or Serum then i might indeed get a 'Jab' of a more deadly Variant of COVID while getting jostled in a subway ride or some such clandestine delivery by a Agent of big-pharma or intel

knowing the difference is to keep it discreet and among those you trust, its not a soap box theater matter imho

As one very interested in human behavior, I cannot help but wonder why Fauci and Pharma and MSM insist upon calling the unapproved drug cocktail a vaccine when it is not a vaccine.

I think there is some meaning to their choice of words.

Of course there is a reason for their choice of words, that's why the words are often changed to suit the agenda of everyone getting inoculated with it.

The most accurate technical description I could find was "medical device" in the form of a "synthetic, inorganic molecule".

Here is the WHO playing word games to make the "vaccines" seems like the only alternative to "herd immunity".

. . . the WHO changed its June 7, 2020 definition from:

"Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection"

to:

"Herd immunity, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it" in Nov. 13, 2020.

But, it again reversed its position in Dec. 2020, with this inane statement:

"Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease, but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing on the pathogen, breaking any chains of transmission"

Well, they worded that last one more accurately, but the WHO website didn't have a trace of that statement when I checked the link, it was back to "vaccines = herd immunity" in the WHO search engine.

As to the meaning of their choice of words, it was to get Emergency Use Authorization, otherwise they have to wait for another three or more years to get people inoculated.

Therapeutics and prophylactics for coronaviruses, like Hydroxychloroquine, have been approved in WHO, CDC and NIH websites. But, suddenly in 2020 they were banned. Why? Because, according to FDA rules only when there are no alternative therapeutics can untested vaccines be cleared for Emergency Use Authorization.

Try the link to the website this information comes from. It's really good explaining the whole situation and a gives a summary of all the information.

No Jab For Me

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

They're all shots as far as I'm concerned. If they stop me from getting sick you can call them whatever you want.

Call it a throbbing-socialist-love-rod and I'd still line up to get one.

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

If anyone asks if you were vaccinated, use the following exact phrase, and you will NOT be lying:

"Definitely, I was immunised"

Think it through - you are saying that you have definitely been immunised; that isn't the same as saying you've definitely been vaccinated, but they will probably take the word "Definitely" as confirmation that you've been vaccinated, even though that is patently NOT what you said...

You could argue successfully that you did not lie, you just elected to talk about something else, and the person harrassing you took it as read that you were complying with their inquiry.

Good idea to create a thread on this.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Interesting choice of words there. Star for the word play.

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Regardless, no matter how we refer to them in the layman colloquial, we all need to remember that it's still illegal for an employer to mandate employees receive one until the actual vaccine is fully approved by the FDA. Any medication or vaccine allowed to be administered under an AEU (Authorized Emergency Use) order can only be voluntary.

a reply to: SlapMonkey

And we all need to remember that in the US the law says that if there is a successful treatment for any given disease, a vaccine for it may not be developed.

The wise men who crafted that law knew that vaccines can be very dangerous and should be kept to a minimum.

There are numerous treatments for Covid, and these shots are fundamentally illegal. Hence the EUA.

Just a quick update on my FIL. After both an upper and lower GI (tests) through which they allegedly found nothing. They then discovered a blood clot in one of his arteries near the heart. They have had him on some IV solution (peppetin, or something like that) to help clear it, and today they performed an angiogram to assess the blockage. Fortunately it has lessened since they spotted it in the CAT scan so they were pleased. He's convinced all of this is from his covid 2nd vaccine because he had nothing before it, and all these things happened all at once immediately following the 2nd shot. The hospital refuses to even acknowledge the allegations and won't even discuss it with him. Period.

The whole thing started with a massive arthritis attack in his shoulder and neck and he'd deteriorated with all manner of other maladies ever since.

So, there's that.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

That sounds terrible. I hope that things continue to rebound for him.

Yes, I think that, as time goes on, there will be a slew of known side effects from the vaccines coming to light. It's very unfortunate that our government has allowed our older generation to be experimented on.

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

I cant say I'm shocked the way this whole things playing out. Thankfully now with the net most of my relatives arent getting any shots.

You cant make this sheez up though - a Religions branded hospital not allowing an exemption on religious grounds. Then to fire her

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

That sounds terrible. I hope that things continue to rebound for him.

Yes, I think that, as time goes on, there will be a slew of known side effects from the vaccines coming to light. It's very unfortunate that our government has allowed our older generation to be experimented on.

All segments of society, not just the older, have been experimented on. They are currently conducting tests on young children, considered criminal in the days of the Nuremberg trials conducted largely by the US.

More than half the population has stood in line or otherwise acquired the injection of an experimental drug, one never before used on human subjects. Yes, men go mad in herds.

The way things are going, semantics aren't going to help. It will be an app tied into your medical records somehow. Unless you knew a good hacker or a doctor that would fake it for you, a fake Vax Passport won't do it and you won't be able to BS your way out.