California man dies after police pin him to ground for five minutes

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: panoz77
Same thing. So you do admit the police had the right to detain and identify the man, that's a step forward for you.

No, it isn't and the Supreme Court has said as much. They have no right to request your name and detain you unless your are suspected of committing a crime. What crime did they tell him he committed prior to the altercation?

They had suspicion of a crime, open containers, drunk in public. They had every legal right to detain him and identify him. You also already admitted that the suspect had open containers, which is a crime. The man resisted legal detainment. Wrong again.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Ok Kevin...you are the smartest man in the WORLD!!!! So was Billy Madison I think...



Question? Do you believe Ashli Babbitt was a justifiable shooting?

originally posted by: panoz77
They had suspicion of a crime, open containers, drunk in public. They had every legal right to detain him and identify him. You also already admitted that the suspect had open containers, which is a crime. The man resisted legal detainment. Wrong again.

Asking who you are and asking is you're carrying ID are two different things, ask the Supreme Court.