It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Trump could have signed an EO to stop this.
Ask yourself why he didn't.
A federal judge issued a summary judgment barring pro-life activist David Daleiden’s organization from releasing hundreds of hours of undercover videos filmed during an abortion conference.
U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick for the Northern District of California issued a ruling last week in National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
Orrick, an Obama appointee, gave the NAF a permanent injunction against the release of any CMP videos or other recordings featuring the abortion organization’s private meetings....
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: dashen
It's the casual depravity that leads me to believe that the left will, at some point, endorse canibalism.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Trump could have signed an EO to stop this.
Ask yourself why he didn't.
It was either they couldn't fit the Executive Order on the tiny signing desk or he likes adrenochrome as much as the next politician.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Gotta pan sear to lock in the flavor.
Lemongrass and fresh cracked pepper.
Best use free range antibiotic free trust fund vegans
originally posted by: frogs453
Yet this policy of using fetuses donated to science led to the recovery of the President from Covid as the monoclonal antibody was derived from human cells from a fetus.
Abortion is legal and if a woman wants to donate for scientific reasons is it different than donating an adult body for science? I'm not arguing your point, I'm asking what the difference is and why the Covid treatment is acceptable as it was developed using this method.