Spain to give pets the same rights as humans

Yeah, human rights for animals! We need to end the mass sterilization of cats and dogs! They have a god given right to reproduce!

a reply to: Athetos

If a dog chases a cat, is that a hate crime? Is that racist?

a reply to: neutronflux

We need to solve the issues with the evil oppressive hierarchies prevalent in the animxl kingdom. No more conflicts at the bxrd feeders. There should be enough bxrd feeders to feed every bxrd, squxrrel, and bexr.

It's okay for eagles to be ganged up on by smaller bxrds though because eagles represent white supremacy and toxic masculinity.

And don't even get me started on the rape culture that goes unchecked in the animxl kingdom.

And no animxl should go unfed or without shelter. We need to exterminate exterminators. They can just learn to code or something. Or go to reeducation facilities. Animxls have a right to live within your walls and eat your food. No more eating scraps out of dumpsters. Every white person should leave a bowl of water and vegetables on the front porch. No meat. Cannibalism is wrong. Animxls shouldn't have to resort to eating each other to survive.

And no milk, because don't get me started on rape culture.

And eagles doesn't have an x because only marginalized animxls get an x in their name. And oppressive creatures aren't worthy of being called animxls. They are less than animxl.

My cats were reading what you wrote and now want to move to spain.

a reply to: DISRAELI

How can you possibly claim that animals have full human rights if they live under what amounts to domestic slavery?

Calling it 'slavery' is a bit of a stretch. Yes, some are slaves, but not all. For most pets, it's actually quite the opposite of slavery. Many pets have it made. They're spoiled.

I know my cat definitely isn't a slave. First off, he never does anything at all that is actually for me. Also, he goes outside almost every morning. He doesn't have to come back, but he chooses to.

a reply to: Robbo2006

Doggy prison will end up full of rapist, Charges of Crapping in public areas. Hounding bitches in public areas, And the list goes on,

I'd say that somewhere near the top of that list would be a very high amount of accusations/complaints regarding pussy grabbing sniffing, and also touching/licking oneself while in the presence of others, without their consent. (possibly indecent exposure)

a reply to: FinallyAwake

So if a neighbor shoots an unarmed dog about to maul him, the neighbor should be charged with murder, right ?


P.S. Dogs should also be allowed to carry firearms for self defense, against "bigoted" humans.....

originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: FinallyAwake

So if a neighbor shoots an unarmed dog about to maul him, the neighbor should be charged with murder, right ?


P.S. Dogs should also be allowed to carry firearms for self defense, against "bigoted" humans.....

No, that would be self defence and only a dogslaughter charge

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: jerich0

The morality behind it is flawless, the enactment may be problematic, they are still pets after all but yes more rights is always better for everyone than less rights, go the other way and you walk back into slavery so your point is excellent.

If it is as claimed, the morality is very flawed. God did not create man as the beasts of the field. He created us in His image and gave us dominion. The morality of this law sets us as equals to the beasts of the field.

And one can say that and still believe they are worthy of kindness and respect.

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: FinallyAwake
One of the most fundamental rights is the right not to be owned by other people.
So if this law really lived up to its publiciity, it would have to include the banning of pet ownership.

Haha yes, true compassion would be millions of people letting their domesticated dogs and cats go!

originally posted by: FinallyAwake

originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: FinallyAwake

So if a neighbor shoots an unarmed dog about to maul him, the neighbor should be charged with murder, right ?


P.S. Dogs should also be allowed to carry firearms for self defense, against "bigoted" humans.....

No, that would be self defence and only a dogslaughter charge

And in Venezuela, also run into the ground by socialists just like Spain, people are reduced to eating dogs....what charges then ?....

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: FinallyAwake

originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: FinallyAwake

So if a neighbor shoots an unarmed dog about to maul him, the neighbor should be charged with murder, right ?


P.S. Dogs should also be allowed to carry firearms for self defense, against "bigoted" humans.....

No, that would be self defence and only a dogslaughter charge

And in Venezuela, also run into the ground by socialists just like Spain, people are reduced to eating dogs....what charges then ?....

Dogabalism!