mRNA Vaccines May Cause Your Body to Churn out PRIONS that “Eat your Brain”

April 8th, 2021: mRNA vaccines may cause your body to churn out PRIONS that “eat your brain” like Mad Cow Disease

The mRNA vaccine works by hijacking your body’s cells and causing them to churn out proteins modeled after the spike proteins in the SARS-cov-2 coronavirus. Since that structure includes prion-like regions, random errors in mRNA sequences — which may be truncated by the human immune system before they reach the ribosomes in the cells — could cause mRNA vaccine recipients to churn out prions in their own bodies. The risk of this was assessed by Dr. J. Bart Classen, who authored a paper in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: “Covid-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease.”

www.naturalnews. com

The article starts off with a zombie theme, but we're basically talking mad cow disease here, incurable and deadly. Just thought this needed it's own thread, as I mentioned this in the Canadian mystery disease thread. It has source links to the original material.

“Side effects may include...”

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Natural News though...

I'll take it with a deer lick block of salt MichiganSwampBuck 😉

The article is misleading.

SARS-CoV-2 is the only corona virus with a prion-like domain found in the receptor binding domain in the S1 region of the spike proteins. It is speculated that this leads to a 10-20 fold higher affinity on ACE2 receptors. In plain English: It's more infectious because it binds better with ACE2 receptors than say SARS-CoV-S.

The conclusion drawn in this article is that if the spike carries prion-like domain in the S1 region, the mRNA vaccinations that redo cells into spike carrying cells, there could be an event where prions (aka proteins that did not fold correct) could enter or be generated in the bloodstream.

I am not a biologist but the transcriptase theory has more merrit than this, currently.

Oh Lordie.

The author of this paper - Dr J Bart Classen - is a well known anti-vaccination quack. What he writes may sound good, even if you could understnd what he's saying, but it's wiely discredited by actual experts.

Therefore, take this thread with a large pinch of salt. Or a bucket, actually.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Natural News though...

I'll take it with a deer lick block of salt MichiganSwampBuck 😉

You must be psychic, I just put out an 80lb block a week ago. Nothing has touched it yet.

originally posted by: paraphi
Oh Lordie.

The author of this paper - Dr J Bart Classen - is a well known anti-vaccination quack. What he writes may sound good, even if you could understnd what he's saying, but it's wiely discredited by actual experts.

Ah, very good. Do you have links to the experts, and their studies backing the discrediting they toss about? Thanks in advance!

The phreaks have been putting human flesh tainted with Kuru into the global meat supply for Centuries.... covid-cold is just triggering these pre-existing dormant weapons they put in us....who knows what could happen.www.bitchute.com...

Funny. Or maybe not so much. But lately, with the interactions I have been having with people in different walks of life, I've pretty much become convinced that COVID does affect the brain even in those asymptomatic of the infection. People just seem to be doing the most nonsensical things lately. Of course, when you think everyone else is insane....

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: paraphi
Oh Lordie.

The author of this paper - Dr J Bart Classen - is a well known anti-vaccination quack. What he writes may sound good, even if you could understnd what he's saying, but it's wiely discredited by actual experts.

Ah, very good. Do you have links to the experts, and their studies backing the discrediting they toss about? Thanks in advance!

You know his name now.
Google it and use the dozens of articles that call him a quack or a nicer variation of quack.
Then come back and refute it.

Don’t be lazy

a reply to: spacedoubt
Since you are a mod, thought I would ask you.

I remember threads based on naturalnews articles being 404'd as soon as they popped up.

Is naturalnews off the blacklist? Is there even still a blacklist after the new owners took over?

Here is the actual paper in .pdf form.

I read it over quickly... actually, the more I read the quicker I read. I saw no research or even detailed hypothesis; the paper reads to me like a lot of "maybe," "might," and "possibly." That's not what i expect from an actual paper.

Of course, I caught this little section:

There is an old saying in medicine that “the cure may be worse than the disease.” The phrase can be applied to vaccines.

That's a built-in bias right there, so great that it managed to be specifically mentioned in the paper.

As to the theory... the mRNA introduced does not go into the nucleus of the cell. It is coated in a lipid to allow the cell to allow it entry, then simply causes the cell to produce a protein. It's quite far from causing a cell to "churn out" proteins. The protein produced is the same as the spike protein found on the virus itself, meaning that if the produced protein causes prions to form, then the virus will cause prions to form.

Look, people, I am cautious as all hell about anything newly produced. I don't like being the guinea pig, so I will not be taking this vaccine at this time. However, papers like this one are doing no good either way. If there is a problem (which I admit is a distinct, if highly unlikely possibility based on our poor understanding of prions), then this guy needs to actually do some science, run some experiments, document some empirical data, something to warrant a paper being published. While we're on the subject of publication, I noticed that the link is not to any medical journals... so it's quite possible this was self-published. That does not invalidate a theory, of course, but taken together with the wording showing such a bias and the lack of solid data included, neither will I lose any sleep over it.

Just another example of someone starting out with a result and then trying to find a path to that result from the data. Wasn't hard; there's no real data there to limit one from doing so.

TheRedneck

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

naturalnews is quackery

Eats your brain ?....So I guess that means this is how the Zombie apocalypse starts ....Is their a Zombie card in the Illuminati game ?

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Here is a direct link to that research. Or rather, to the abstract and the results of that research paper.

Volume 5 | Issue 1 | 1 of 3Microbiol Infect Dis, 2021COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease

originally posted by: TheRedneck
...
As to the theory... the mRNA introduced does not go into the nucleus of the cell. It is coated in a lipid to allow the cell to allow it entry, then simply causes the cell to produce a protein. It's quite far from causing a cell to "churn out" proteins. The protein produced is the same as the spike protein found on the virus itself, meaning that if the produced protein causes prions to form, then the virus will cause prions to form.
...
TheRedneck

The protein spike of the virus MIGHT not enter the nucleus of our chromosomal dna. But the mRNA vaccines made by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do enter the nucleus of our extrachromosomal dna since these vaccines inject the spike protein of the virus to plasmids, and plasmids do enter the nucleus of our extrachromosomal dna or ecDNA. Our ecDNA serve many important biological functions of the human body, and as a matter of fact diseases like cancer grow/replicate and propagate through our extrachromosomal dna.

Here is an example of such a process.

Cytoplasmic transport and nuclear import of plasmid DNA

Some research on cancer replicating/propagating itself through extrachromosomal dna.

Extrachromosomal DNA is common in human cancer and drives poor patient outcomes

The roles that extra-chromosomal DNA ecDNA may play in cancer have been the subject of speculation, but details have been elusive. Now, a paper in Nature Genetics implicates ecDNA in a wide variety of cancers, and associates it with aggressive, difficult-to-treat cases.

Again, we are talking about injecting experimental vaccines whose longtime effects are unknown. Do you really want to inject yourself with experimental vaccines that have no proper longterm studies?

What's more.

bioRxiv

. 2020 Dec 13;2020.12.12.422516.
doi: 10.1101/2020.12.12.422516. Preprint
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A Young, Rudolf Jaenisch

PMID: 33330870 PMCID: PMC7743078 DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.12.422516

Free PMC article
Abstract

Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome

Here is a website attempting to ignore and dismiss what some researchers have found about these vaccines.

...
mRNA — BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna vaccines
...
A variant of the mRNA approach is to go one step back in the process and construct a vaccine platform out of DNA instead. This DNA template — constructed by scientists to encode for the coronavirus spike protein — gets into cells where it is read into mRNA and… well the rest is the same.

You might ask whether this DNA can genetically engineer your cells. Once again, the answer is no. DNA is injected in little circular pieces called “plasmids” — not to be confused with plastics — and while these do enter the nucleus, the new DNA does not integrate into your cellular genome. Got it?
...

allianceforscience.cornell.edu...

Ironically researchers have found the opposite of what "Mark Lynas" wants to claim in that article.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

The protein spike of the virus MIGHT not enter the nucleus of our chromosomal dna.

Mites grow on chickens.

The protein spikes absolutely do not enter the nucleus; if they did, the cell would die before it could reproduce the virus. Proteins are made in ribosomes, not in the cell nucleus.

But the mRNA vaccines made by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do enter the nucleus of our extrachromosomal dna since these vaccines inject the spike protein of the virus to plasmids, and plasmids do enter the nucleus of our extrachromosomal dna or ecDNA.

There is so much wrong with this I am having trouble knowing where to begin.

The vaccines do not enter the nucleus of the cell. If they did, the cell would die without producing the desired protein.

The spike protein is not injected into anything. There is no spike protein in the vaccines. The vaccines contain mRNA molecules encased in lipids (so the cell will ingest them) that instruct ribosomes to produce the spike protein.

Extrachromosomal DNA does not have a nucleus to be entered. DNA itself does not have a nucleus to be entered. Cells have a nucleus, where the cellular DNA is kept. Extrachromosomal DNA may or may not be within this nucleus, but is not affected by mRNA in the first place.

A molecule of mRNA is created at the DNA, be it nuclear or extrachromosomal, and instructs the ribosomes to produce specific proteins. At no time does mRNA affect DNA.

Do you really want to inject yourself with experimental vaccines that have no proper longterm studies?

Dude, breathe... I will not be getting the vaccine for that exact reason. I have stated such many times. I want to see long-term evidence of safety and effectiveness in practice before I accept any vaccine (or any medicine for that matter). Besides, I have a particularly strong immunity in general and do not fear this "deadly" virus that rarely kills.

All I am doing is trying to keep the conversation out of the realm of rainbows and unicorn farts. It would help if you understood how a protein is even produced and how a cell works before making wild claims.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
What's more.

That paper is talking about the virus, not vaccines. The paper doesn't mention vaccines even once.
The full text is here:
www.biorxiv.org...