It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Former President Donald Trump reportedly convinced unwitting supporters to give tens of millions in recurring donations to his 2020 campaign—a scam that allowed the campaign to withdraw weekly payments from one-time contributors as the election neared
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Arnie123
Again exactly what evidence has Powell presented?
Her words are not evidence! Great claims require great evidence and to date she has produced pricesly zilch!
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Arnie123
Again exactly what evidence has Powell presented?
Her words are not evidence! Great claims require great evidence and to date she has produced pricesly zilch!
She is innocent until proven guilty. Where is your proof other than made up lies? It is you that have to prove. Your little made up sound bites get no respect.
originally posted by: incoserv
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Arnie123
Again exactly what evidence has Powell presented?
Her words are not evidence! Great claims require great evidence and to date she has produced pricesly zilch!
She is innocent until proven guilty. Where is your proof other than made up lies? It is you that have to prove. Your little made up sound bites get no respect.
Have you poured through the documentation on her website? Here's a link to make it easy for you ...
defendingtherepublic.org...
Have you poured through the documentation on her website? Here's a link to make it easy for you ...
Contrary to what the Fake News is pushing, Sidney did NOT claim in court that ‘no reasonable person would believe her claims’. The press is using twisted legalese and manipulating the legal standard to confuse the issue, as they have done before in other high-profile cases. Ms. Powell’s statements were legal opinions that she stands behind, as they were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence. Dominion claims that the evidence Ms. Powell relied upon to assert her claims concerning the lack of election integrity is incredible and not believable. Ms. Powell responded by pointing out that her assertions were her legal opinions based on the evidence she presented to four different courts. Accordingly, her statements are not subject to challenge under defamation law.