It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: Klassified
If it happens, you can bet her VP will be a white man....solely for the optics....having Kamala in power over a white male....betcha it's Beto.....
Optics are even better with Kamala having a white male husband....
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Lumenari
I don't think it's a civil war they are after as much as the "great reset" they seem to be all-in for, but I wouldn't put it past them to use a civil war to try and expedite it.
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Klassified
Determining a persons worth based on genitalia instead of merit is called sexism.
Determining a persons worth based on skin color instead of merit is called racism.
Democrats are racist and sexist.
And not one single dEmocrat supporter or leftist on ATS denies that.
They embrace it.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Klassified
Determining a persons worth based on genitalia instead of merit is called sexism.
Determining a persons worth based on skin color instead of merit is called racism.
Democrats are racist and sexist.
And not one single dEmocrat supporter or leftist on ATS denies that.
They embrace it.
Well sure. They hide their racism & sexism behind "progressivism" or whatever they call it.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: Klassified
If it happens, you can bet her VP will be a white man....solely for the optics....having Kamala in power over a white male....betcha it's Beto.....
Optics are even better with Kamala having a white male husband....
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Klassified
It is a sad statement that they can't actually elect a women to the office. They have to force her on us.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Klassified
It is a sad statement that they can't actually elect a women to the office. They have to force her on us.
If they were to put a good woman running they could get a woman president. I kind of liked Gabby, because she was half way conservative and would have done a decent job in office. But not Hillary or some of the far left and corrupt pushy women they have tried to get in....I have no problem voting for a woman, just as long as she is honest, moral, and more intelligent than Biden is....which half of the woman in this country would qualify as.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Vasa Croe
.having Kamala in power over a white male....betcha it's Beto.....
nope, it'll be booty check. then they can claim the first black woman pres and first gay vice pres.
it's all about projection as being progressive and inclusive.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Somebody needs to research what happens in the Senate when there's a 50/50 tie and no VP to vote a tie breaker vote.
Think about the "consequences" of a "Super-Catch-22" situation 🤣☠️🤣
Why would a DNC insider blow the whistle to the Clover chronicle?
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Vasa Croe
.having Kamala in power over a white male....betcha it's Beto.....
nope, it'll be booty check. then they can claim the first black woman pres and first gay vice pres.
it's all about projection as being progressive and inclusive.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: Klassified
If it happens, you can bet her VP will be a white man....solely for the optics....having Kamala in power over a white male....betcha it's Beto.....
Optics are even better with Kamala having a white male husband....
Great that’s all we need.
Putin would laugh himself silly over those 2 idiots running this country.
originally posted by: Klassified
I had no intention of making another thread in the near future, but I think this deserves one since the topic has been speculated upon here. Note that this comes from an alleged DNC "whistle-blower", so take it with a grain of salt until we know more.
In approximately 6 months or so after his inauguration, Biden is going to resign from his position to allow Harris to assume total control. For so long, the Democrats have wanted a female president, and since they failed putting Hillary in, they’re settling for Kamala. Not only are they just “settling” for her, it’s a great opportunity (in their eyes) because she’s both a woman and person of color (part Jamaican & Indian).
So even the democrats don't want Kamala? What a sad statement on a political career, if not a life.
The short piece states the "real meat of the story" is the list of candidates they already have, though they are considering others. Without further ado...
1. Michelle Obama
2. Cory Booker
3. Ilhan Omar
4. Rashida Tlaib
5. Oprah Winfrey
6. Linda Sarsour
7. Mark Ruffalo
8. Maxine Waters
9. Sheila Jackson Lee
10. Meghan Markle
He/She goes on to say Kamala plans to revamp Biden's present cabinet once he's gone with even farther left picks, including members of "the squad". We really are so screwed if there's any truth to this beyond what we already know, which is that Joe isn't going to last long.
Link
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: Klassified
If it happens, you can bet her VP will be a white man....solely for the optics....having Kamala in power over a white male....betcha it's Beto.....
Optics are even better with Kamala having a white male husband....
Great that’s all we need.
Putin would laugh himself silly over those 2 idiots running this country.
As opposed to now?