I was wrong the whole time. This changes everything.

Before the term "polygamy" was created there was the original terms "beast" and "dragon".

Remember, the beast spake as a dragon. Meaning "dragon" is just another term for "beast". The modern term for "dragon" and "beast" is "polygamy".

The beast or the dragon is the polygamy of eight heads, that is consisting of one heterosexual God and seven bisexual goddesses.

The polygamy (the beast or the dragon) has eight kingdoms (horns with crowns upon them) instead of ten kingdoms, because two of the kingdoms are like a sacrifice (lamb). Besides, since it is eight heads it is only right that it is eight kingdoms.

One of its heads was as it were wounded to death, but its deadly wound was healed - This is the eighth head (God). God is just not Himself, is what it means, but He shall be returned to Himself, and be with His seven wives. He belongs to the seven goddesses (His wives).

Rise up out of the sea means rise up out of the spirit form and come to earth (physical) form. Coming up out of the earth (physical form) means return back to spirit form. This is why it said it exercises all the power of the first beast before it. So, the beast out the sea and the beast out the earth are one in the same. It is just a matter of which form it takes on by the polygamy's choice.

If we count the number of the beast, it is one, because it is a polygamy. It gave you the clue when it said the number of a man. Get it? A man is one. Plus, 666 is also just one number.

a reply to: Claymation213
Yes you were, but the run hasn't ended yet.

a reply to: Claymation213

Please link for me why "Dragon" or "Beast" is now the term for "Polygamy."

Because last I checked, the word "Polygamy"came from the late 1500's and had not a thing to do with the Bible, or "Dragon", or "Beast."

Thank you in advance...

This is so far off base that its situated on Venus!

God, wives, spiritual, you're just inserting words into sentences when the context is all in your head. God does not have a wife, what are you smoking!?

originally posted by: Joneselius
This is so far off base that its situated on Venus!

The word Dragon is a terrible lizard and the beasts it talks of represent kingdoms, this is apparent. Seriously, how do you people just make this stuff up?

You should stop playing around and actually read scripture. Practicing good dispensational reading.

God, wives, spiritual, you're just inserting words into sentences when the context is all in your head. God does not have a wife, what are you smoking!?

originally posted by: Joneselius
This is so far off base that its situated on Venus!

God, wives, spiritual, you're just inserting words into sentences when the context is all in your head. God does not have a wife, what are you smoking!?

It is called the book of Revelation, because SOMETHING OF THE TRUTH has to be revealed by the reader that has understanding.

a reply to: Claymation213

If there are crowns involved, then there are queens involved. Last I checked, a king is someone not single.

Upon his horns ten crowns.

a reply to: Claymation213

No, it's called the book of Revelation because that's what it is, Jesus Christ revealing what is to pass.

The revelation was given to John. It's literally called the revelation of Jesus Christ to the apostle John.

You're playing fast and loose with definitions and words to make them fit your weird theory.

Tell me, what's the whole point of the Bible?

a reply to: Joneselius
Well there is a problem with God not having a wife. There was a rewright where God's wife was written out but not to the extent to be totally removed, They made her into the tree of life.

Some of the men in charge of the church had decided to make women into a lower class by removing the wife of God thus giving them more power over the people. Before this time, men and women were pretty much equal in the church.

Always remember organized religion, has nothing to do with belief in the Creator.

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: Joneselius
Well there is a problem with God not having a wife. There was a rewright where God's wife was written out but not to the extent to be totally removed, They made her into the tree of life.

Some of the men in charge of the church had decided to make women into a lower class by removing the wife of God thus giving them more power over the people. Before this time, men and women were pretty much equal in the church.

Always remember organized religion, has nothing to do with belief in the Creator.

You are confused .

a reply to: Joneselius
To whom are you referring to with "Jesus Christ"?

You want the original meanings of these names applied, so be it.

Jesus literally translates to Son of Zeus.

Chist is from Christos which is the latin name for the Egyptian god Horus, the son of Isis.

Now, is this person you are referring to Greek (Hellenes) or Egyptian?

originally posted by: Joneselius
This is so far off base that its situated on Venus!

God, wives, spiritual, you're just inserting words into sentences when the context is all in your head. God does not have a wife, what are you smoking!?

Actually they are confusing themselves.

www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...

a reply to: Gothmog
No, I have done the research beyond where normal people fear to look.

Is everything a lie in the Bible? No. But the church has menuplited it to their own end to control the people and not to help them to believe.

Why did Sir Fransis Bacon reweight the Bible to make it sound more poetic? I think he should not have changed anything.

a reply to: Claymation213

Have you never heard of “the bride of Christ”
Small correction, it’s not 7-8 or 9 wives, it’s the Christian church

The Bride of Christ - Biblical Meaning of the Church Explained
Search domain www.christianity.com/wiki/church/the-church-is-the-bride-of-christ.htmlwww.christianity.com...
The Bride of Christ Awaits the Promised Reunion Scripture also promises a final reunion between Jesus Christ and His bride, the church. When Christ returns in the prophesied Second Coming, He will celebrate with His bride in a wedding ceremony where the two will be united forever. "Let us rejoice and be glad and give him glory!

Umm, you're still wrong.

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: Joneselius
To whom are you referring to with "Jesus Christ"?

You want the original meanings of these names applied, so be it.

Jesus literally translates to Son of Zeus.

Chist is from Christos which is the latin name for the Egyptian god Horus, the son of Isis.

Now, is this person you are referring to Greek (Hellenes) or Egyptian?

You might want to put in a wee little more effort into understanding who and what Jesus actually means and it’s relevance to his Hebrew name and the Anglicised/Roman/Greek version
allthatsinteresting.com...


Please just don’t think you know anything about the name, it embarrasses you

Ya know, God woulda done a solid kindness to make the Bible legible to the literal minded and/or plumb stupid.

With the convoluted analogies, allusions, numerology, translation problems, tedious begatting and general confusion they all engender, it seems more a work of clever men to produce certain results benefiting the few, the proud, the clever.

I'll return to sacrificing virgins at the alter of base lust, now.

a reply to: beyondknowledge

No, I have done the research beyond where normal people fear to look.

Really ?
Mind showing your "sources" ?

originally posted by: Baddogma
Ya know, God woulda done a solid kindness to make the Bible legible to the literal minded and/or plumb stupid.

With the convoluted analogies, allusions, numerology, translation problems, tedious begatting and general confusion they all engender, it seems more a work of clever men to produce certain results benefiting the few, the proud, the clever.

I'll return to sacrificing virgins at the alter of base lust, now.

That’s actually a fair comment but, in its defence, it was written 2000 plus years ago in an ancient language and a different culture
If a person is serious, if a person really wants to understand, if an individual really cares then they will find the truth and though the bible is as you describe
It teaches love, that’s the seem of gold running through it, love others because God loves you

a reply to: Raggedyman
I thought his name was Hoshua (not the hebrew or latin spelling) as it would be in his time. As I have stated the organized religions have changed it over the years.

Start with the Greek and Hebrew Bibles and work backword, no translation past the Greek and Hebrew can be useful as the accuracy drops with each further translation.