BOMBSHELL: Doctor Loses 22 Patients After COVID Vaccine

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Let me help you out QAnon kid.

x

Only thing im suffering from is "Stonedness" syndrome.

You like men dressed up like women don't you? Well I'm disgusted.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Well of course a little levity where a Man is dressed as a Woman disgusts you, i could bet money on that one QAnon kid.

What i like are facts, evidence, common-sense, truth, all those things you seem to have an aversion to swallowing in spades. x

a reply to: chr0naut

I don't know why your post doesn't have 1000 stars.

Thank you! So much bad information being reported.

originally posted by: Freenrgy2
a reply to: chr0naut

I don't know why your post doesn't have 1000 stars.

Thank you! So much bad information being reported.

Because what he claims is a red herring. The RNA instructs the DNA to change. May as well be directly changing the DNA.

Doctor explains how vaccine works.

originally posted by: chr0naut
In no way does the vaccine modify your genetics. We wouldn't become a GMO by taking a vaccine.

This is true... but...

It does alter the messages that are sent from your DNA to all of the cells in your entire body...

So, answer me this...

Does it really matter that it is not actually is modifying your underlying DNA, if it actually is altering the messages your DNA sends to the rest of your body (through the mRNA)?

Sorry, but I don't even trust Bill Gates when it comes to Windows 10 code (we're still suffering from his new friendlier BSOD caused by the latest security update 'package' that crashes PCs that use certain printers (Kyocera's being the ones we have). You want me to trust him with modifying the software of life itself?

Rotflmao!

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
In no way does the vaccine modify your genetics. We wouldn't become a GMO by taking a vaccine.

This is true... but...

It does alter the messages that are sent from your DNA to all of the cells in your entire body...

So, answer me this...

Does it really matter that it is not actually is modifying your underlying DNA, if it actually is altering the messages your DNA sends to the rest of your body (through the mRNA)?

Sorry, but I don't even trust Bill Gates when it comes to Windows 10 code (we're still suffering from his new friendlier BSOD caused by the latest security update 'package' that crashes PCs that use certain printers (Kyocera's being the ones we have). You want me to trust him with modifying the software of life itself?

Rotflmao!

As explained, the RNA only affects a single location, within a cell wall. Normally RNA does not escape the cell that is is generated within.

In the case of a virus, the viral RNA gets packaged within a viral protein coating and then it kills the cell where it is assembled. Breaking up the cell wall. So that is how the viral RNA gets out of the cell.

The outer coat of the virus once it has exited the cell has chemical mechanisms that traverse the cell walls of other cells it encounters, in the case of SARS-nCoV-2, it is the 'spike' proteins on the surface of the virus that cause the cell wall to open up and allow the viral package inside, releasing the viral RNA, which goes on to build a new virus and the process repeats...

Normally, RNA generated within a cell by transcription remains within that cell and gives instruction to build amino acids in sequence. It does not get out of the cell to affect the whole body. Each cell contains the DNA, the messenger RNA and all the protein making 'factories' it requires.

originally posted by: chr0naut
As explained, the RNA only affects a single location,

Your explanation is faulty, and despite your trying to make it appear authoritative, is fully worthy of being totally ignored.

“DNA” vs. “RNA” vs. “mRNA”: The Differences Are Vital.

This is not a vaccine, it is brand new, untested technology attempting to hack the very GOD-code that controls every aspect of our bodies.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Despite the evidence to suggest the contrary.

Vaccines are all just fine and do what they say on the tin.

If you don't want it don't take little proud boy.

Your mad Orange Unhappy Gilmore's full of the stuff all the same.

Imagine that.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
This is not a vaccine, it is brand new, untested technology attempting to hack the very GOD-code that controls every aspect of our bodies.

False on all accounts.

Google "vaccine side effects", and you'll see no mention of anything worse than a little pain in the arm, or a rash. Nothing worse than what you get from a Flu or Shingles shot.

Google "Odds of dying from Covid-19" and you will not see any MSM or Google highlight boxes at the top of the results telling you how rare deaths are for healthy people under age 70.

At some point, a media outlet will be sued successfully (BIGLY) for the hysteria and deception intentionally levied on the population. When that precedent is set, they will all become less of an enemy to the people of America...and the human race in general.

originally posted by: Freenrgy2
originally posted by: tanstaafl
"This is not a vaccine, it is brand new, untested technology attempting to hack the very GOD-code that controls every aspect of our bodies."

False on all accounts.

Except... it is the truth.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
As explained, the RNA only affects a single location,

Your explanation is faulty, and despite your trying to make it appear authoritative, is fully worthy of being totally ignored.

“DNA” vs. “RNA” vs. “mRNA”: The Differences Are Vital.

This is not a vaccine, it is brand new, untested technology attempting to hack the very GOD-code that controls every aspect of our bodies.

Is there any thing in existence that is not created by God?

Surely you are using emotive and inaccurate terminology to try and convince yourself and everyone else that we shouldn't do 'sciencey' things.

Everything is "God code". If we pick up a rock, we are changing God's natural order of how He created things.

LOL.

originally posted by: carewemust
Google "vaccine side effects", and you'll see no mention of anything worse than a little pain in the arm, or a rash. Nothing worse than what you get from a Flu or Shingles shot.

Google "Odds of dying from Covid-19" and you will not see any MSM or Google highlight boxes at the top of the results telling you how rare deaths are for healthy people under age 70.

At some point, a media outlet will be sued successfully (BIGLY) for the hysteria and deception intentionally levied on the population. When that precedent is set, they will all become less of an enemy to the people of America...and the human race in general.

You are still treating it as though it only affects the old and the sick.

It's a disease. It makes you sick. And it affects some people who aren't older.

Update... Andy died

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
As explained, the RNA only affects a single location,

Your explanation is faulty, and despite your trying to make it appear authoritative, is fully worthy of being totally ignored.

“DNA” vs. “RNA” vs. “mRNA”: The Differences Are Vital.

This is not a vaccine, it is brand new, untested technology attempting to hack the very GOD-code that controls every aspect of our bodies.

Is there any thing in existence that is not created by God?

If you want to define something totally man-made - like a nuclear reactor fast breeder - as made by God, simply because God made man, then go ahead... it doesn't make it so.

Surely you are using emotive and inaccurate terminology to try and convince yourself and everyone else that we shouldn't do 'sciencey' things.

Nope. I'm all for science. And the science behind this stuff - mRNA technology, CRISPR technology for example - is amazing, and has incredible potential.

And that is the conundrum... it has incredible potential, but for both good and especially for evil.

So, the question is, do you trust those currently in power and controlling this technology?

I'll speak for myself and my family and friends when I say not just NO, but HELL NO. I don't trust them when it comes to our food, and I don't trust them when it comes to their health recommendations, and I sure as hell don't trust them when it comes to injecting toxic chemicals into my newborn babies.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
As explained, the RNA only affects a single location,

Your explanation is faulty, and despite your trying to make it appear authoritative, is fully worthy of being totally ignored.

“DNA” vs. “RNA” vs. “mRNA”: The Differences Are Vital.

This is not a vaccine, it is brand new, untested technology attempting to hack the very GOD-code that controls every aspect of our bodies.

Is there any thing in existence that is not created by God?

If you want to define something totally man-made - like a nuclear reactor fast breeder - as made by God, simply because God made man, then go ahead... it doesn't make it so.

Every nuclear interaction happens in nature, too. Take a look up at the stars, untouched by human hand.

Surely you are using emotive and inaccurate terminology to try and convince yourself and everyone else that we shouldn't do 'sciencey' things.

Nope. I'm all for science. And the science behind this stiff - mRNA technology, CRISPR technology for example - is amazing, and has incredible potential.

And that is the conundrum... it has incredible potential, but for both good and especially for evil.

Someone could use, for instance; something as mundane as false information, for evil. Anything can be turned for good or evil. The evil is in the intent. Do you think all those many hundreds of doctors, scientists, and medical institutions are intending to use vaccines for evil?

The thing is, it is a disease, and they are trying to mitigate against it the best ways they can.

So, the question is, do you trust those currently in power and controlling this technology?

I'll speak for myself and my family and friends when I say not just NO, but HELL NO. I don't trust them when it comes to our food, and I don't trust them when it comes to their health recommendations, and I sure as hell don't trust them when it comes to injecting toxic chemicals into my newborn babies.

All the thoughts of men were only evil, all the time, and so God spoke to Noah...

originally posted by: chr0naut
You are still treating it as though it only affects the old and the sick.

It does.

It's a disease. It makes you sick. And it affects some people who aren't older.

Age isn't the primary risk factor.

Obesity and/or diabetes/insulin resistance are the largest risk factors, and every single person that I have researched that was below age 60 that died was obese and/or diabetic.

originally posted by: chr0naut
Every nuclear interaction happens in nature, too.

Yeah... which is irrelevant, since I didn't say nuclear 'interactions', I said nuclear REACTORS - specifically, FAST BREEDER reactors.

Take a look up at the stars, untouched by human hand.

Yes, they are beautiful, and far more relevant than your responses.

"Nope. I'm all for science. And the science behind this stiff - mRNA technology, CRISPR technology for example - is amazing, and has incredible potential.

And that is the conundrum... it has incredible potential, but for both good and especially for evil."

Someone could use, for instance; something as mundane as false information, for evil.

Yes, but they can't force feed it down your throat, or hold you down and inject it into your blood, can they?

Your irrelevant responses are really boring.

Anything can be turned for good or evil. The evil is in the intent. Do you think all those many hundreds of doctors, scientists, and medical institutions are intending to use vaccines for evil?

Let's see, what was it that the road to hell is paved with??? Oh, yeah...

The thing is, it is a disease,

No. It is a virus. They claim the virus causes some disease, but for all intents and purposes, said disease is simply the flu, and yes, it kills some people - just like the flu.

and they are trying to mitigate against it the best ways they can.

By lying. About everything to do with it. They can kiss my ass.

I repeat...

"So, the question is, do you trust those currently in power and controlling this technology?

I'll speak for myself and my family and friends when I say not just NO, but HELL NO. I don't trust them when it comes to our food, and I don't trust them when it comes to their health recommendations, and I sure as hell don't trust them when it comes to injecting toxic chemicals into my newborn babies."

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
Every nuclear interaction happens in nature, too.

Yeah... which is irrelevant, since I didn't say nuclear 'interactions', I said nuclear REACTORS - specifically, FAST BREEDER reactors.

Fast breeder reactors convert non-radioactive actinides to radioactive isotopes by nucleosynthesis, providing a continually replenished cycle of nuclear fuel - this also happens in stars, it's what stars 'do'.



The same thing is also responsible for the heat that keeps the Earth's mantle and core molten. If the core went cold and solidified, the magnetic field of the Earth would weaken and the ionosphere would collapse, allowing ionizing solar radiation to reach the earth and sterilize it of life (which includes me). So i'm sort of happy that nature does this stuff, too.

There have also been other instances of natural nuclear chain reactions that have converted barely fissile material and 'burned' it fairly efficiently: Natural nuclear fission reactor - from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Take a look up at the stars, untouched by human hand.

Yes, they are beautiful, and far more relevant than your responses.

But what you seem to have missed is that stars are natural nuclear fast breeder reactors. They generate their own fuel in an efficient self-sustaining fuel cycle. And God made them like that.

"Nope. I'm all for science. And the science behind this stiff - mRNA technology, CRISPR technology for example - is amazing, and has incredible potential.

And that is the conundrum... it has incredible potential, but for both good and especially for evil."

Someone could use, for instance; something as mundane as false information, for evil.

Yes, but they can't force feed it down your throat, or hold you down and inject it into your blood, can they?

Why can't "they"? Your ideation was just that "they" are so powerful and we are so comparatively defenseless against their evil intentions?

Your irrelevant responses are really boring.

But your irrelevant responses are so interesting - and 'special', too!

Anything can be turned for good or evil. The evil is in the intent. Do you think all those many hundreds of doctors, scientists, and medical institutions are intending to use vaccines for evil?

Let's see, what was it that the road to hell is paved with??? Oh, yeah...

The thing is, it is a disease,

No. It is a virus. They claim the virus causes some disease, but for all intents and purposes, said disease is simply the flu, and yes, it kills some people - just like the flu.

The virus causes a disease. The virus doesn't kill at a distance and just because it is a virus. It kills because it causes a disease. Disease that happens to be pandemic, by most definitions. It is far more dangerous than any 'flu, both in mortality figures and in the chronic damage it leaves behind.

It also isn't a flu virus - by definition, they are different things. Both are viruses, but different types.

and they are trying to mitigate against it the best ways they can.

By lying. About everything to do with it. They can kiss my ass.

Well, I'm sorry to inform you, that "they" are not likely to want to put their face anywhere near your backside. Especially if "they" actually bore you any ill will.



I tried to explain the reasons why "they" aren't lying. Do you, perhaps, think I am trying to lie, too?

Also, even if "they" were lying, what advantage would it be to them? Wouldn't they be just as affected if their economies crash and burn, and "they", their friends, and relatives, get sick or die? The whole idea of 'kooky evil conspiracy' sort of falls flat when you analyze it in any depth.

I repeat...

"So, the question is, do you trust those currently in power and controlling this technology?

Not entirely.

But I do know they are as inept and as incapable as any other human.

And, I am a 'born again' Christian. I don't think God is inept. He has also promised to protect and defend those who hold to His truths and are repentant.

I'll speak for myself and my family and friends when I say not just NO, but HELL NO. I don't trust them when it comes to our food, and I don't trust them when it comes to their health recommendations, and I sure as hell don't trust them when it comes to injecting toxic chemicals into my newborn babies."

I don't think any of the vaccines are approved for use in babies and infants yet. But new-borns are an 'at-risk' group for COVID-19, like the elderly.

I imagine that once the vaccine is provably safe and has approval for use, it will be offered as an option for babies. I know that Moderna has begun trials in the UK for that age group. Other vaccines are being tested, in other countries, but on older children Pfizer on 12-15 year olds, and AstraZeneca on 6 and up.

originally posted by: chr0naut
Fast breeder reactors convert non-radioactive actinides to radioactive isotopes by nucleosynthesis, providing a continually replenished cycle of nuclear fuel - this also happens in stars, it's what stars 'do'.

Ah. So you are incapable of understanding the technical differences between a naturally occurring star, and a fast breeder reactor that was built by men.

Got it.

Why can't "they"?

Ah. So you are incapable of comprehending the difference between something of substance they can forcefully inject into my arm, and something non-substantive, like information, that can't be forcefully injected - yet at least.

Got it.

Your ideation was just that "they" are so powerful and we are so comparatively defenseless against their evil intentions?

Wrong again... do you ever get tired of being wrong?

The virus causes a disease.

Maybe. Sometimes. Does it cause a disease in all of those people who were exposed and had ZERO symptoms?

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

The virus doesn't kill at a distance and just because it is a virus. It kills because it causes a disease.

Maybe. Sometimes. Does it cause a disease in all of those people who were exposed and had ZERO symptoms?

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Disease that happens to be pandemic, by most definitions.

By your definition, we've been experiencing a flu pandemic since the dawn of time.

It is far more dangerous than any 'flu, both in mortality figures

Actually, according to the CDC's own numbers, it really isn't, even when someone goes totally untreated.

Add in the known effective treatments that were not only ignored but actively ridiculed - like hydroxy, and now ivermectin - and the CFR goes down to basically ZERO.

and in the chronic damage it leaves behind.

Maybe. There is zero proof of this at this time.

Just like there is zero proof of long term damage from these new highly experimental shots being falsely referred to as vaccines.

It also isn't a flu virus - by definition, they are different things. Both are viruses, but different types.

I didn't say it was the flu... did I? I said it was like the flu.

Apparently your comprehension problems are pretty much unlimited.

Got it.

I tried to explain the reasons why "they" aren't lying. Do you, perhaps, think I am trying to lie, too?

I don't try to pretend like I can read your mind.

But I have powers of observation, so...

You are either lying, or being deliberately ignorant (which is far worse in my book).

Also, even if "they" were lying, what advantage would it be to them? Wouldn't they be just as affected if their economies crash and burn, and "they", their friends, and relatives, get sick or die? The whole idea of 'kooky evil conspiracy' sort of falls flat when you analyze it in any depth.

Only when you analyze it from a perspective of deliberate ignorance.

The cabal wants their New World Order, and they will have it - at any cost. And no, they won't be affected by what is coming, and anyone they care about (if that is even possible) they will bring with them to their bunkers to ride out the storm.

I actually think that they would be perfectly fine with a future as depicted in Logans Run.

"I repeat...

"So, the question is, do you trust those currently in power and controlling this technology?"

Not entirely.

But I do know they are as inept and as incapable as any other human.

Ah, yes, inept and incapable... that is how and why they've been able to maintain a power stranglehold on the entire world for thousands of years. By being inept and incapable.

And, I am a 'born again' Christian. I don't think God is inept. He has also promised to protect and defend those who hold to His truths and are repentant.

Actually he (Christ) promised you that you would experience even more persecution than he did.

I don't think any of the vaccines are approved for use in babies and infants yet.

They aren't approved for anyone under 18, but some states are already making them available to those as young as 16 - even though their risk is ZERO.

But new-borns are an 'at-risk' group for COVID-19, like the elderly.

No. They aren't. Now you are lying.

Recommending vaccines for someone that is at ZERO risk is just insane.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Prove it isn't true.

Asking someone to prove a negative means you have lost the argument.

You can not prove anything that was said in that video.