BOMBSHELL: Doctor Loses 22 Patients After COVID Vaccine

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: 1947boomer

Obviously the doctors he is talking to are not in medicine. It is impossible to get the virus from the vacine,

It is possible for a vaccine to induce an immune response in cells which can alter it's creation of immune chemicals, that can actually accentuate or possibly change something like ATCG on DNA just like they do in creating genetically modified organisms. Chemicals can do that too. But there is no live virus that is supposed to be in the vaccine. Viruses can also initiate change in the dna too, because it can trigger a similar response on infected cells. The potential problem is with the adjuvants used, they can permeate cell membranes to increase the mrna materials reaching the inside of cells and also to get into the blood brain barrier and coating on the spinal chord. This can cause unknown consequences, this vaccine has not been evaluated long term. I feel that the Jenssen vaccine is probably safer than the mrna vaccines myself, that type of vaccine has been used before but not with this particular microbe.

I am not an anti-vaxer, I just like to make sure people are informed. Also, I get my info from research, the research on the mrna is not yet conclusive as to what may happen long term, so I have no evidence either way to advise people with. It is a person's own decision if they want to take it, I cannot take it because I am in a higher risk of a severe reaction to it so I will not take it. It might be fine and beneficial for others, just not me.

I had my first shot three week ago the Oxford astra zeneca. Other than a slight headache and the occasional feeling of nausea its fine. Glad I had the astra zeneca now, I mean its been argued about and researched by nearly every European country in EU and eventually everyone's accepted its safe so next shot mid May

a reply to: 1947boomer

I think you're overreacting. The call in doctor said that they use a small snippet of the original virus. This small snippet of virus RNA that gets into your cytoplasm fits the definition of a virus. It changes your cells into factories that then produce the foreign protein into your body.

Maybe the Doctor misspoke about the protein being a virus.

Old vaccines are much safer, as their is a limited amount. These new RNA vaccines could produce too much proteins they just don't know. We are getting reports of the body attacking it's own organs. To get rid of these proteins.

If you get the vaccine you are a GMO.

originally posted by: watchitburn

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
COVID Vaccines Are Illegal Bioweapon Says Author of Bioweapons Law

Out of 500,000 US Troops. Forcibly inoculated with the original Franken Shots, 11,000 were killed and 100,000 were disabled. Healthy young men and women.

I didn't see that in your link, where did that come from?

I'm not getting the Covid shot unless I have to.
But I'm in the military and I know hundreds of people who have gotten it. None have died. Many did have adverse reactions but none were "disabled" by it.

I'm calling BS.

There's no way the military could hide 11,000 deaths. Maybe 50 years ago they could have, but not now.

He was talking about his case in 1991, not Covid vaccine deaths. Probably the anthrax shots or the total sum. No one cared to watch the vid obviously.
J&J vax is said to use another virus as a delivery system. There was that polio "contamination" in India or smallpox in African children to name a few. Have you never heard of them?

originally posted by: redchad
I had my first shot three week ago the Oxford astra zeneca. Other than a slight headache and the occasional feeling of nausea its fine. Glad I had the astra zeneca now, I mean its been argued about and researched by nearly every European country in EU and eventually everyone's accepted its safe so next shot mid May

Actually their is no concenses that it is safe. More countries are at least pausing on these RNA vaccinations. Look at the big picture.

Horrendous Covid Vaccine Dangers Exposed

Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years. He is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX. He has written articles on politics, health, media, culture and art for LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, Village Voice, Nexus, CBS Healthwatch, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. In 1982, the LA Weekly submitted his name for a Pulitzer prize, for his interview with the president of El Salvador University, where the military had taken over the campus. Jon has hosted, produced, and written radio programs and segments in Los Angeles and Las Vegas (KPFK, KLAV). He has appeared as a guest on over 200 radio and television programs, including ABC's Nightline, Tony Brown's Journal (PBS), and Hard Copy. In 1994, Jon ran for a seat in the US Congress from the 29th district in Los Angeles. After six months of campaigning, on a very small budget, he garnered 20 percent of the vote running against an incumbent who had occupied his seat for 20 years. In 1996, Jon started The Great Boycott, against eight corporate chemical giants: Monsanto, Dow, Du Pont, Bayer, Hoechst, Rhone-Poulenc, Imperial Chemical Industries, and Ciba-Geigy. The Boycott continues to operate today. Jon has lectured extensively all over the US on the question: Who runs the world and what can we do about it? Since 2000, Jon has operated largely away from the mainstream because, as he puts it, "My research was not friendly to the conventional media." Over the last 30 years, Jon's independent research has encompassed such areas as: deep politics, conspiracies, alternative health, the potential of the human imagination, mind control, the medical cartel, symbology, and solutions to the takeover of the planet by hidden elites. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. A painter, Jon's work has been shown in galleries in Los Angeles and New York. His poetry has been published by The Massachusetts Review. He is a graduate of Amherst College (BA, Philosophy), and lives with his wife, Laura, in San Diego.

nomorefakenews.com

I think this Dr should be listened to

Dolores Cahill's Biography

Dolores Cahill, Professor, University College Dublin
Prof. Cahill received her degree in Molecular Genetics from Trinity College Dublin (1989) and her PhD in Immunology from Dublin City University in 1994. She was group leader of the Protein Technology Group in the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany (1996-2003) She co-founded a biotechnology company, Protagen AG (www.protagen.de) in Dortmund to commercialise this technology. Since 2005, she is Professor of Translational Science at the UCD School of Medicine and Medical Sciences.
Her research, publication and patent record is in high content protein/antibody arrays and their biomedical applications. Application include the characterisation of antibodies specificity (including therapeutic antibodies), biomarker discovery validation, diagnostics, assay development, protein-interaction studies, proteomics, large scale/systems biology research.
She is a member of a number of Editorial and Science Advisory and Review Boards. For the past 10 years she has been involved in policy development in the areas of science, technology and innovation, including in the EU Health, Innovation and Infrastructure. Since 2003, she is a Member of the Irish Government’s Advisory Science Council (ASC) (www.sciencecouncil.ie), appointed by the Minister for Industry, Trade and Employment. For the past ten years, she is on a number of Science Advisory & Review Boards, including for BMBF/DLR in Germany; BBSRC in the UK; Vinnova in Sweden. She has received prizes for her research, including the prestigious BMBF ‘BioFuture’ Award from the German Minister of Science. She was awarded the Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS) 2009 Award for her research & its significance. Other recipients of this award include Prof. J. Craig Venter & Prof. Robert Huber.

www.bitchute.com...

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Doctor says vaccine is basically a virus. All a virus really is, is a chemical code that changes the function of your cells. The vaccine mutates your DNA or RNA and causes your body to produce a virus.

You have no clue as to what you're talking about.

A functioning virus consists of a bunch of genetic materials which can be either DNA or RNA (depending on what species the virus is) surrounded by a shell of proteins and lipids (fat like molecules) which help the virus attqch to a host cell and inject the DNA or RNA through the cell wall into the cytoplasm. The viral DNA or RNA contains all the necessary information to reproduce itself plus all the proteins and lipids of the original virus. This allows it to create multiple copies of itself inside the host cell. This kills the host cell, which breaks open and releases the newly created virus copies to go on and infect additional host cells. That's what a viral infection is.

Traditional vaccines operate by injecting into the host what's called a "killed virus". Killed viruses are whole viruses which have been made unable to actually reproduce by means of heat, radiation, or certain chemicals. When killed viruses get into your body, your immune system recognizes them as foreign and starts building up antibodies. That way, when you get exposed to naturally occurring live viruses of that type, your immune system recognizes them as something it has seen before and is able to quickly produce specific antibodies to counter that virus. That type of vaccine does NOT cause your body to produce viruses.

The new types of vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer) do not inject a whole, killed virus at all. They inject a small snippet of the virus RNA into your cell's cytoplasm. That snippet of RNA uses your cell's metabolism to produce some copies of a couple of the proteins that the virus uses to attach to your cell (the "spike" protein). Your immune system recognizes those proteins as foreign bodies and starts building up antibodies to them in exactly the same way it does for killed viruses. That snippet of virus RNA has a very short lifetime in your cells, so after it has produced a number of copies of the spike protein, it disintegrates and is flushed out of your cells. These new vaccines are also totally incapable of reproducing an entire virus because they contain only a tiny fraction of the virus' genome.

They are also incapable of altering your RNA or DNA. In human cells, the DNA is contained inside the cell nucleus. In the human cell nucleus DNA creates RNA and the RNA then diffuses out into the cytoplasm in order to create proteins. In order for a bit of foreign RNA to alter your DNA, it would first have to get from your cell's cytoplasm through the nuclear membrane and then it would have to undergo a process called reverse transcription, where the foreign RNA creates DNA which could then theoretically get incorporated into your genome. Except that there are mechanisms in place that prevent RNA from traveling from the cytoplasm into the nucleus. Human cells also do not make reverse transcriptase, which is the enzyme necessary to create DNA from RNA.

Some viruses--the retroviruses--are able to make reverse transcriptase and plant copies of themselves into your genome, but Coronaviruses can't do that.

There is no such thing as a "virus" .... there ARE viral sized contaminants and pollutants and ALSO viral sized living bacteria....all of which enjoy the purview of your bloodstream.

You are a victim of The Great Virus Lie and obviously a deeply indoctrinated one.

Never mind everyone. Its been debunked. Confirmed. Were all safe. NOT!

CONFIRMED: NO ONE HAS DIED FROM ANY COVID VACCINE...?

a reply to: watchitburn

JD for me. regular doses.

a reply to: rickymouse

Wow! 25% of Congress are not getting vaccinated?

a reply to: Doctor Smith

a reply to: Doctor Smith

This cannot have been a doctor.

The vaccine doesn't modify DNA.

And those aren't the definitions of a virus, or of a vaccine.

It was clearly an ignorant kooky random caller, lying to an ignorant kooky random media site, and saying ignorant kooky random things.

a reply to: watchitburn

Have your fellow soldiers/sailors/airmen/marines who have gotten the vaccine gotten both shots? How much time has passed since they got the second shot?

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: rickymouse

I had shots Jameson yesterday.

Do you mean the Janssen vaccine? My wife got that today, I won't be getting one because I have had severe reactions to vaccines in the past.

I suspect Jameson Whiskey

My mom got the Moderna, 3 days ago..business as usual so far.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Doctor Smith

This cannot have been a doctor.

The vaccine doesn't modify DNA.

And those aren't the definitions of a virus, or of a vaccine.

It was clearly an ignorant kooky random caller, lying to an ignorant kooky random media site, and saying ignorant kooky random things.

For your information. RNA is where cancer comes from. If you have bad code in your RNA you get cancer. The virus (or code) injected into the body from the vaccine makes the programmed cells in your body a virus protein manufacturing factory. You are a GMO if you get the vaccine.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Doctor Smith

This cannot have been a doctor.

The vaccine doesn't modify DNA.

And those aren't the definitions of a virus, or of a vaccine.

It was clearly an ignorant kooky random caller, lying to an ignorant kooky random media site, and saying ignorant kooky random things.

For your information. RNA is where cancer comes from. If you have bad code in your RNA you get cancer. The virus (or code) injected into the body from the vaccine makes the programmed cells in your body a virus protein manufacturing factory. You are a GMO if you get the vaccine.

No it isnt, So doc want to try again? You can have cancer form do to damage to DNA like epsien bar desease. But MRNA can actually be used to train your immune system to attack cancer cells. Been some major breaktroughs in actual cancer vacines. Same principle as they are using to fight covid teach your body to attack proteins that are not supposed to be there.

Alex Jones.

Enough said.

Come on OP

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Never mind everyone. Its been debunked. Confirmed. Were all safe. NOT!

CONFIRMED: NO ONE HAS DIED FROM ANY COVID VACCINE...?

That source presents itself as "the corporate propaganda antidote". Yet it starts by talking about "any lunatics that are considering to get the vaccination." Doesn't seem to be the right approach to use such loaded language in a reverse appeal to pride that plays on people's fear of seeming stupid (like a lunatic) if one wants to present their message as the "propaganda antidote". Fighting fire with fire isn't all that helpful here. It's normal sensible human behaviour to consider getting a vaccination when all the so-called "experts" that you see in the media, are recommending it and claiming that it works very effectively with minimal risks (that's not saying anything about whether or not that's true/factual/certain or whether or not they're all being honest about the subject; but to paint those who merely consider getting the vaccination, not even only those who have already decided to get one, but everyone who merely considers it, as lunatics, is a cheap shot to appeal to a particular type of person or segment of the market/the potential audience to affect their views of themselves in comparison with these other supposed "lunatics"). Consider this:

...
Playing on the Emotions

Even though feelings might be irrelevant when it comes to factual claims or the logic of an argument, they play a crucial role in persuasion. Emotional appeals are fabricated by practiced publicists, who play on feelings as skillfully as a virtuoso plays the piano.

For example, fear is an emotion that can becloud judgment. ...

Hatred is a strong emotion exploited by propagandists. Loaded language is particularly effective in triggering it. ...

Some propagandists play on pride. Often we can spot appeals to pride by looking for such key phrases as: “Any intelligent person knows that . . .” or, “A person with your education can’t help but see that . . .” A reverse appeal to pride plays on our fear of seeming stupid. Professionals in persuasion are well aware of that.

Source: The Manipulation of Information (Awake!—2000)

... Your emotions, not your logical thinking abilities, are their target.

The propagandist makes sure that his message appears to be the right and moral one and that it gives you a sense of importance and belonging if you follow it. You are one of the smart ones, you are not alone, you are comfortable and secure—so they say.

How can you protect yourself from the types of people that the Bible calls “profitless talkers” and “deceivers of the mind”? (Titus 1:10) Once you are familiar with some of their tricks, you are in a better position to evaluate any message or information that comes your way. Here are some ways to do this.

...

Put information to the test: ... No matter what you are reading or watching or listening to, test to see whether it has propagandistic overtones or is truthful.
...
Ask questions: As we have seen, there are many today who would like to ‘delude us with persuasive arguments.’ (Colossians 2:4) Therefore, when we are presented with persuasive arguments, we should ask questions.

First, examine whether there is bias. What is the motive for the message? If the message is rife with name-calling and loaded words, why is that? Loaded language aside, what are the merits of the message itself? Also, if possible, try to check the track record of those speaking. Are they known to speak the truth? ... If you sense some appeal to emotions, ask yourself, ‘When viewed dispassionately, what are the merits of the message?’

Source: Do Not Be a Victim of Propaganda! (Awake!—2000)

Honest education is still better than loaded language and appeals to the emotions in order to make yourself or your message more popular. Forget about the popularity contest, you're not any better or smarter or more awake than those who have decided to get a vaccination (or are merely considering it). You just trust different people, and to me it sounds like they're lying* everytime they claim that the mRNA vaccines change someone's DNA in their genome in the cell nucleus permanently (*: when they're experts it's more likely that they know better, or at least they should know beter, hence the phrase "sounds like they're lying"). So the track record of those who do that doesn't seem very great to me (haven't checked if anyone on the SGT Report also makes this specific claim, just speaking in general about those who do). Actually, it's not much better than those who are pushing the vaccines rather excessively, when alternate approaches (HCQ + extras) have been proven much more effective with less risks, and are much farther along in terms of honest research into it regarding the risk vs reward ratio (including longterm).

a reply to: dragonridr

Alex Jones breaks down the recent admissions of humanoid entities being created to circumvent human rights violations in experimental research, and shows the stories showing admissions that mRNA technology leads to cancer.

Alex Jones breaks down the recent admissions of humanoid entities being created to circumvent human rights violations in experimental research, and shows the stories showing admissions that mRNA technology leads to cancer.