New restrictions 2022

The current lockdown will be led by data - not by dates!
where england is setting out a timetable for the "end to the lockdown" (which will be revoked the week before carrying out, cause, you know... fk u!) , the rest of the UK is setting out their "strategy" , saying they will be led by "data - not dates" - nice sound bite!

The same sound bite they will use in 2022 when further restrictions are implemented.
Restrictions on shopping for food will be led by science! - We will be able to tell you as/when and if you need to purchase food. Dietary requirements will be led by data, not dates! - You dont need 3 square meals a day (science tells us thats a triangle, not a square!), well tell you When you need to eat, and "suggest" what you should eat to make the most of your limited food allowance. (obv once the "suggested" meals become habit, it will be enforced... )
think this is unlikely? - look what happened when they introduced "emergency social tax" after the 2008 financial crisis, still paying that!
As has been said on here numerous times, once they get that power...they never give it up!... i pity the kids!

Hope you like tofu!

WTF you talking about?
a reply to: Midnite247

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
WTF you talking about?
a reply to: Midnite247

He's talking about this.

f# that then.
so glad im not in europe
used to idolise it living there as a kid when i was a military brat. so much smarter. so much culture. 80s to 2000s
now it seems that since the 2000s and EU its gone down the #ter faster than any group of countries in the world. The usa is the last bastion of freedom and never thought id say that.


a reply to: ColeYounger

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
f# that then.
so glad im not in europe
used to idolise it living there as a kid when i was a military brat. so much smarter. so much culture. 80s to 2000s
now it seems that since the 2000s and EU its gone down the #ter faster than any group of countries in the world. The usa is the last bastion of freedom and never thought id say that.


a reply to: ColeYounger

Many, many people agree.

Thats sarc right?
Whilst the uk/eu response is woefully inadequate , it's a different playing field to the non response head in the sand North Koreaesque response from the US where state response blames the federal and the fed washes their hands to individual states whilst having the highest death rates in the world .
If u really believe ur better off in the US ... Ur media is doing a fantastic job
a reply to: chris_stibrany

a reply to: Midnite247
I'm not experiencing legal restrictions on food shopping now. Why would they impose extra ones?
Besides, you only need to look at the daily news to appreciate that even "going out to socialise" restrictions are proving very difficult to enforce without very hard work. So, again, why would the authorities make life harder for themselves by imposing extra ones purely for the sake of having restrictions? There is a plausibility gap.

originally posted by: Midnite247
Thats sarc right?
Whilst the uk/eu response is woefully inadequate , it's a different playing field to the non response head in the sand North Koreaesque response from the US where state response blames the federal and the fed washes their hands to individual states whilst having the highest death rates in the world .
If u really believe ur better off in the US ... Ur media is doing a fantastic job
a reply to: chris_stibrany

I think you'll find that the U.K s deathrate is worse than the US.
120000 for 70 million against 500000 for 330 million.

Because this is a conspiracy website!!!! Lol

Still , even that, going out to socialise is def not a thing here! The "carrot" of social tut tutting, and the very real stick of fines/road blocks mean socialising is a non existent Ymmv
a reply to: DISRAELI

a reply to: ColeYounger

And of course, he’s giving the interview WITHOUT a mask....BS

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: Midnite247
Thats sarc right?
Whilst the uk/eu response is woefully inadequate , it's a different playing field to the non response head in the sand North Koreaesque response from the US where state response blames the federal and the fed washes their hands to individual states whilst having the highest death rates in the world .
If u really believe ur better off in the US ... Ur media is doing a fantastic job
a reply to: chris_stibrany

I think you'll find that the U.K s deathrate is worse than the US.
120000 for 70 million against 500000 for 330 million.

.0017 vs. .0015

That’s not that big of a difference.

That 5000000 , being a higher number thsn 120000 , means US has the highest number of deaths in the world . Your right by displaying per populous u get 1 figure, by race u get another figure, by red ford Capri owner au get another figure... 500000 still makes US the highest death rate worldwide tho.
a reply to: glen200376

originally posted by: Midnite247
That 5000000 , being a higher number thsn 120000 , means US has the highest number of deaths in the world . Your right by displaying per populous u get 1 figure, by race u get another figure, by red ford Capri owner au get another figure... 500000 still makes US the highest death rate worldwide tho.

It's nowhere near the highest. en.wikipedia.org... You are confusing death RATE with deaths.

I'm not "confusing" anything . To be confused, you have to be presented with a fact that you don't understand.
What we have here is a manipulation of data so that there is not one steady set of facts .
As stated above , regardless of how u slice it, there's 500000 US deaths . That is all .

There's facts, opinions, and interpretation. Call it what u want.
a reply to: schuyler

originally posted by: Midnite247
500000 still makes US the highest death rate worldwide tho.

Yeah, but we miraculously cured people of dying from old age ... not to mention the virtual eradication of the flu. Hell ... I thought we'd almost gotten rid of death by motorcycle accident there for awhile.

originally posted by: Midnite247
Thats sarc right?
Whilst the uk/eu response is woefully inadequate , it's a different playing field to the non response head in the sand North Koreaesque response from the US where state response blames the federal and the fed washes their hands to individual states whilst having the highest death rates in the world .
If u really believe ur better off in the US ... Ur media is doing a fantastic job
a reply to: chris_stibrany

Anywhere that doesn't buy into the corona virus hoax is better off.

a reply to: Midnite247

Perhaps the current Technocracy™ is a result of folks blindly believing anything dressed-up as ' Science™ ' ?

If the world could be ruled by usurping ' Science™ ' : why are folks so reticent to considering that it may have already happened ?

With the humanity drained from life : all decisions could be made by cold-hard data, and base-level logic ?

Who's gonna check that the data is accurate ?
Or will we be just served decrees, based on what our 'leaders' call ' Science™ ' ?

How long until we are told to shave our heads and faces, and wear unisex tunics ?

" I'm sorry sir : your social-credit rating is too low for a personal menu choice. Here is your government-allotted nutrition-bar. "

" No. Sorry sir. The data is unquestionable. "

We've seen their ' Science™ ', and it is way more than questionable.

The whole world is going nuts. Data and evidence can be misinterpreted both by desire and by accident.

I think that this is a game of follow the leader, this virus is not bad for everyone, protect those who are at risk of a serious event. Others can get immunity the regular way, by getting the virus. If people fear the virus or have questions regarding the effect on their immune system, take the vaccine. It is available now.

If I get this virus, and I die, at least I don't have to spend my last years bedridden in a nursing home. I can't take this vaccine because I have overreactions to some vaccines and intolerances to some of the ingredients, the data shows I should beware of taking it.

a reply to: Midnite247

the non response head in the sand North Koreaesque response from the US where state response blames the federal and the fed washes their hands to individual states whilst having the highest death rates in the world .

Excuse me but the UK has a higher death rate per million than the US. www.worldometers.info...

As stated above , regardless of how u slice it, there's 500000 US deaths .

The US also has a far bigger population than many nations, which is why you have to look at the rate per million.

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: Midnite247
Thats sarc right?
Whilst the uk/eu response is woefully inadequate , it's a different playing field to the non response head in the sand North Koreaesque response from the US where state response blames the federal and the fed washes their hands to individual states whilst having the highest death rates in the world .
If u really believe ur better off in the US ... Ur media is doing a fantastic job
a reply to: chris_stibrany

I think you'll find that the U.K s deathrate is worse than the US.
120000 for 70 million against 500000 for 330 million.

I checked our UK death rates by year only a few days ago, via one of the most official government approved sited and after a bloody long search [they don't make it easy to find], I saw with my own eyes that the deathrates of all people in the UK was the lowest in 2020, whilst the highest recently was in 2015 [or 2014].
I do not believe any simple numbers given to us by TV stations or news agencies.
I also don't care about other country's death rates as they are probably also totally distorted unless you do your own digging.

Somewhere on this large site, there is also a list, which I can't find right now. It's best if people search for it themselves, they just don't want to give annual deaths too easily to compare but it is there.
Just adding that to show where I get my info from.
file:///C:/Users/ncole/Desktop/plandemic/Monthly%20mortality%20analysis,%20England%20and%20Wales%20-%20Office%20for%20National%20Statistics.html

I also don't care when they tell me that so many deaths are down to covid, as it doesn't matter what kills people, if there are less people dying in a year than that is a good thing right?
Also if so many dies of covid, are all cancers, heart attacks, strokes, suicides and pneumonia cured?

The whole numbers game is rigged. In reality no more people died than in other years, actually less!

That's all I need to know.