FBI Seized Congressional Phone Records on Congressional Attacks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Boadicea

We also know from court filings that the one organized group that did plan something as a very small group of Oath Keepers, not anyone else, and they took extensive steps to follow laws as closely as possible, even going so far as to follow DC's firearms laws which is why the only person shot was likely Ashli Babbit shot by law enforcement. No one else had their firearms.

They did wear tactical gear and carry bear spray and a few batons.

Yes, which I find curious in and of itself. Over the years, I have had much respect for the Oath Keepers, and I've also been disappointed in the Oath Keepers. I'm really not sure what to make of them as a whole, or their part in this protest. I'm more inclined to think that a few went rogue, or even that a few bad apples infiltrated the group, than to think the entire organization was behind a "coup" attempt.

I'm just going to keep paying attention and see what comes of it all.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: ketsuko
You may want to brush up on what can and can't be do e in DC in regards to being legal and what is not.
The laws there are much different than most places in he US.
And if your bored there are many great documentary films about this!

No documentary needed...

Congress has 'exclusive legislative jurisdiction' over DC (and other territories and places owned by the feds inside the states where the State ceded jurisdiction).

Not only that, I guarantee you that there are laws covering interception of all signals in and around the capital being fair game.

Anyone who would go into such a situation not expecting that all of their communications would be legally monitored and recorded is just ignorant.