It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
Discussing controversial ideology and exploring taboo topics is free speech. Describing or planning the methods by which you want to commit criminal assault or damage private/federal property to intimidate the community or its leaders is not free speech. Let's just remember that distinction before diving too far down the rabbit hole.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
Discussing controversial ideology and exploring taboo topics is free speech. Describing or planning the methods by which you want to commit criminal assault or damage private/federal property to intimidate the community or its leaders is not free speech. Let's just remember that distinction before diving too far down the rabbit hole.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
Discussing controversial ideology and exploring taboo topics is free speech. Describing or planning the methods by which you want to commit criminal assault or damage private/federal property to intimidate the community or its leaders is not free speech. Let's just remember that distinction before diving too far down the rabbit hole.
originally posted by: SKEPTEK
originally posted by: TzarChasm
Discussing controversial ideology and exploring taboo topics is free speech. Describing or planning the methods by which you want to commit criminal assault or damage private/federal property to intimidate the community or its leaders is not free speech. Let's just remember that distinction before diving too far down the rabbit hole.
Wrong.
That is free speech whether you or they like it or not.