It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thought it 'could' be worth sharing. Ya never know.
originally posted by: Zrtst
a reply to: Snarl
interesting theory.
That's one part of the biblical texts which read like historical facts rather than faith-based storytelling. Thanks for the effort you put into your reply.
however according to the O.T. stories, the Ark of the Covenant did not always cause prosperity...the Philistines captured the Ark, but as recounted in Wiki..."1 Samuel 5 and 6 describe the Philistines as having to move the Ark to several parts of their territory, as tumours or hemorrhoids ("emerods") afflicted the people in each town to which it was taken: Ashdod, then Gath, then Ekron. The Septuagint adds that "mice sprang up in the midst of their country".[5] Stirrup points out that the "severity of the punishments increases through the passage": tumours in Ashdod (vv. 6-8), extensive tumours and panic in Gath, which had volunteered to take on the Ark (vv. 9,10a), and tumours on those who did not die and deathly panic in Ekron, which was 'volunteered' to take the Ark (vv. 10b-12).[6] The text explicitly ascribes the plague to "Yahweh's hand" (1 Samuel 5:6)."
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
So how are we going to get out of this trap?
a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn