It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WHO Rejects Virus Lab Theory, Saying Animals Likely Source

page: 4
38
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 11 2021 @ 06:33 AM
link   
The Who has been wrong the whole time, they have someone’s arm way up their ass guiding them. You can tell by the word “likely” they used the science to make sure before making such a declaration with broad reach political impact.

Nah.

a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened


edit on 11-2-2021 by Rob808 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2021 @ 07:05 AM
link   
A few more points I'd like to make...

1. In no way, shape or form am I acquitting the US; we own at least part of the blame for this.
* We have consistently provided funding for research such as this
* Our corporations and academic institutions consistently participated in "gain of function" studies for pathogens
* Our government has abdicated it's responsibility in clamping down on the more risky side of this research legally
* Our politicians failed us by not applying more pressure on other nations to stop this reckless research.

2. Some posters have provided even /another/ possible infection vector (i.e. selling animals from the research lab that were /supposed/ to be incinerated to local markets) that I initially glossed over; thanks for raising that.

3. Trump is no longer president; he is a private citizen now.
* Trump pushed to immediately halt travel from affected areas in China; he was fought every step of the way
* Trump in no uncertain terms placed blame for origin and spreading of the virus on the rightful party (CCP)
* This papering over of culpability and facts by the WHO is occurring /right now/ on Joe Biden's watch

4. If one is still, after the mix of direct evidence (testimony of involved researchers) and mountain of circumstantial evidence (everything in my OP) that's out there, not believing that this virus originated in some fashion from the lab in Wuhan.....I don't know what else to say? Maybe start spending more time on abc.com or cnn.com; those information sources are more able provide confirmation bias to your worldview. Or perhaps some folks here refusing to believe the facts are intentionally obfuscating the story. As the saying goes "You can lead a horse to water but can't force them to drink it."
edit on 11-2-2021 by SleeperHasAwakened because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2021 @ 09:07 AM
link   
a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened



I find it to be an easy and effective rebuttal to nonsensical ideas and obvious information manipulation tailored for those with thick skulls who are easily lead by the nose.


This sums up nicely everyone that voted for biden.

The wet markets were ruled out early on. And actually speaking of that virus lab. THERE WERE BATS IN THERE that had the virus and variants of the virus for study. Someone got bit.



posted on Feb, 11 2021 @ 07:06 PM
link   
Do we really need a thread to discuss what we all knew the moment someone pointed out how close the Wuhan lab was from the wet market???
Seriously, we all know it came from the lab. This isn’t some BS story of hidden weapons of mass destruction. Ibis his time hiding in the bush’s ready to pull a fast one.
The Chinese have unleashed plenty of disease on the planet. Enough for its neighbors to be ready for their next virus.
Not conspiracy but, when your country builds two massive hospitals in less than 10 days and supposedly controls the virus so quickly that they have lower deaths than all other 1st world most 2nd world and 3rd world countries. It begs to not question anything.
We all know they did it.
Actually, there is one question.
Did they do it on purpose or accident?



posted on Feb, 11 2021 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Sheepsblood



Actually, there is one question.
Did they do it on purpose or accident?


Yeah, good question. I'm gonna go with accident because they don't want to destroy to world economy just yet. They are still bleeding the U.S. dry at the moment.



posted on Feb, 12 2021 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Singapore, sars 2003, lab tech cross contaminates West Nile virus with Sars and becomes infected. Lab accidents never happen with horrific results.



posted on Feb, 12 2021 @ 02:18 AM
link   
Here’s the cure. They had it and bragged about it but bc of the modernized licensing of traditional medicine in 1999, and then got to see who used it in 2003, they were able to identify and suppress TCM easily. Then WHO helped them make all the TCM patented as Intellectual Property and scrub the web of it. Well they tried at least. So this why sars 2003 disappeared so fast and this sars which is basically the same in net result didnt. And the same crackpots are all involved if you just Google all the names and orgs involved. Just big pharma paying people off again and getting them to accept their drugs. Anyway these dipsh#ts are obvious and amateur hour. Can we go back to aliens or something harder now?

[目的]探索中医药治疗传染性非典型肺炎(SARS)的有效方法.[方法]对61例入院时以卫气分证为主的SARS患者,治以疏风清 热、利湿解毒法,拟定基础方(僵蚕10g、蝉蜕6g、银花10 g、连翘10g、桔梗10g、蒲公英20g、芦根20g、甘草6 g)随证加减,配合中成药清开灵、鱼腥草注射液及小柴胡片进行治疗,按相关标准进行疗效分析,并与同期深圳东湖医� ��采用纯西医治疗的50例作对照分析.[结果]本院收治的61例全部治愈出院,平均退热时间为(4.03±3.94)d,肺部阴影开始吸 收时间平均为(4.34±2.76)d,病灶明显吸收或完全吸收时间为(6.93±4.02)d,平均住院天数为(9.05±4.91)d;与同期深圳东湖医院 采用纯西医治疗的50例比较,平均住院时间、胸片病灶开始吸收时间及明显吸收时间均较短,治愈率较高.60例卫、气� �证患者经治疗均未传入营血分.无1例出现成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),无1例使用免疫球蛋白和抗病毒西药;仅1例使用� �面罩持续正压吸氧;仅5例(占8.20%)短期应用过地塞米松,无1例出现股骨头坏死.[结论]对SARS患者早期应用疏风清热、� �湿解毒为主的中医药治疗,能有效控制病情由卫气分传入营血分,疗效较单纯西医治疗有一定优势.
【Objective】 To establish an effective regimen of Chinese medicine for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). 【Method】Sixty-one cases of SARS (Group A), which were mainly classified as weifen syndrome, were treated by the methods of dispelling wind, clearing away heat and toxins, removing dampness. Based on the above thera- peutic principle, the following prescription was established: Bombyx Batryticatus 10g, Periostracum Cicadae 6g, Flos Lonicerae 10g, Fructus Forsythiae10g, Radix Platycodi 10g, Herba Taraxaci 20g, Rhizoma Phragmitis 20g, Radix Gly- cyrrhizae 6g. Qingkailing Injection, Yuxingcao Injection and Xiaochaihu Tablet were added according to the variation of symptoms. Therapeutic effect was evaluated under the related standard and was compared simultaneously with that in 50 cases from Shenzhen Donghu hospital which were treated with western medicine alone (Group B). 【Results】 All the cases were cured and discharged. The average defervescence time (ADT) was (4.03±3.94) d; the average time of in- flammtion-shadow on chest radiography initially being absorbed was (4.34±2.76) d; time for obvious absorption or complete absorption of shadow was (6.93±4.02) d. The average hospitalization time (AHT) was (9.05±4.91) d. The average hospitalization time, time for shadow being initially absorbed and that for being obviously absorbed were shorter, the curative effect being higher in group A than those in group B. After treatment, 60 cases were cured and transmission into yingfen or xuefen syndrome did not occur. None of the cases suffered from acute respiratory distress syndrome; none of the cases was given immunoglobulin or anti-virus drugs. Continuous positive-pressure oxygen-supply mask was used only in one case. Five cases were given dexamethasone for a short time. Femoral necrosis was not found in any of the cases
edit on 12-2-2021 by tonycodes because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2021 @ 02:23 AM
link   
Coronavirus and the animals it’s in have been around a really long time. And all of a sudden it’s an issue. They have been curing this for a long time using TCM and just comparing 03 to now makes it obvious which ingredients are not being used now, but were then.



posted on Feb, 12 2021 @ 04:41 AM
link   
Did anyone actually believe that they would say anything different? This has to be the biggest non surprise ever.

I mean the entire world gets slammed by a rampant corona virus, almost exactly like those the Bio Lab in Wuhan are working on - clearly documented, it breaks out close to the lab and the lab has nothing to do with it? Riiigghhhhttttttt!!!!!

We are lied to at every turn. This is why THEY want to crush conspiracy theories and sites like this. A few people gathered in the cave around tiny flames or truth. They wouldn’t want to crush us if we weren’t spot on. They know the danger in leaving embers of truth smouldering. a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened



posted on Feb, 12 2021 @ 04:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: Sheepsblood



Actually, there is one question.
Did they do it on purpose or accident?


Yeah, good question. I'm gonna go with accident because they don't want to destroy to world economy just yet. They are still bleeding the U.S. dry at the moment.


I've got to disagree a little. The timing of this was a little too convenient. Trump was putting a pretty good squeeze on the chinese and it turning out to be an election year? A nice bonus for them. Now they got their puppet harris/biden in office.



posted on Feb, 12 2021 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

And here I thought it was demons. Who heard of a virus that come from a lab anyway except in a monster movie. A demon bat. Makes sense.



posted on Feb, 12 2021 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sheepsblood
Do we really need a thread to discuss what we all knew the moment someone pointed out how close the Wuhan lab was from the wet market???
Seriously, we all know it came from the lab. This isn’t some BS story of hidden weapons of mass destruction. Ibis his time hiding in the bush’s ready to pull a fast one.
The Chinese have unleashed plenty of disease on the planet. Enough for its neighbors to be ready for their next virus.
Not conspiracy but, when your country builds two massive hospitals in less than 10 days and supposedly controls the virus so quickly that they have lower deaths than all other 1st world most 2nd world and 3rd world countries. It begs to not question anything.
We all know they did it.
Actually, there is one question.
Did they do it on purpose or accident?


I think you are confused.

This thread pertains to the MSM narrative that the virus DID NOT originate in the lab at Wuhan. Read the link in the OP please.

SO not sure who you referring to when you say "we all know they did it". Who's "we"? Sure, probably most posters on ATS are suspicious of such narratives, but we are in the minority. Most of the sheep read articles like that and don't bother to think critically.



new topics

top topics



 
38
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join