WHO Rejects Virus Lab Theory, Saying Animals Likely Source

Anybody ever heard that in 1997 a sample of the Spanish Influenza virus was obtained ??

www.historynet.com...

originally posted by: Stu112
Apparently the state controlled news in china is blaming america for covid

Circa a year ago:

This is not news

"Animals" ?

Eating bats and/or household pets (yes, those sickos kill little puppies and kittens) is NOT eating animals. That in itself is negligent. Must be a left wing thing, they do it in Venezuela too. Amazing how the civilized world (US, Japan, Russian, Italy, Brazil, etc) don't eat our precious little pets

But I don't believe the WHO for one second. They, along with every other "institution," are entirely discredited

If you view the WHO as some sort of semi-reliable professional source......you’re a moron

The WHO is as reliable and professional as the UN.

Not reliable at all. Not professional at all and ONE HUNDRED PERCENT bought and paid for

If the WHO (or the UN) is saying it, it’s false

originally posted by: SleeperHasAwakened

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck

So it does seem to me that the Wuhan BSL-4 is the source of the coronavirus. My guess is that they were researching SARS, and they weaponize it further by giving it a gain of function properties, which means it could be more lethal.

Indeed, the latest report now is it’s a 15% fatality rate, which is more than SARS at 83% infection rate. A typical gain of function travels in the air so it could reach out maybe six feet or more from someone emitting a sneeze or a cough. Likewise, this is a specially designated WHO research lab. The WHO was in on it and they knew full well what was going on there.

LINK

I'm not so sure about this Dr. they interview, some of his assumptions have been "fact checked", but then again, that may make help verify it as more than likely.

Personally I'm not claiming it was a bio-weapon; I'll leave that for the experts to argue. I'm not even claiming the release was deliberate, although compelling arguments can be made about why such a thing would be done and WHO (pun intended) benefits (Hint: which G20 nation's GDP was likely the only one that actually expanded during the historic economic collapse of 2020? Again WHO indeed??)

Nevertheless, whatever it was intended to do, and however it got out into circulation, it came from the lab in Wuhan, either intentionally or accidentally. Period.

I find the idea that this virus didn't originate in the highly restricted bio research lab in Wuhan insulting and a blatant coverup and psyop job, designed to extract the Chinese from the hot water that they've been simmering in since last year.

I am tempted to write more scorching and blistering rebukes about Biden, but I will leave that for the MudPit for another time. I want people to fully grasp the enormity of this psyop, outside the context of everyday politics, and realize the scope and enormity of what we're seeing right before our eyes:

One of the most injurious and destructive crimes in human history, either by malicious intent or by carelessness, the release of a deadly pathogen into the human population, that resulted in millions of deaths around the globe and untold economic damage (while China's GDP actually /grew/ in 2020, hmmmmm!), is being swept under the rug, and a narrative crafted to completely remove the perpetrators from recrimination or blame.

This, in time, may end up being the mother of all conspiracy theories: how a bio-catastrophy was framed as a mix-up at a food market , making it the most tragic betrayal and epic wallpapering over of facts in human history.

Indeed. How many have died from this in China? Why so few? Why such a draconian reaction? Even so their death figures should have been much higher.

So they’ve lost a few thousand people, increased our global dependency and weakened every other major economy significantly. Who needs billets eh?

And the WHO were never going to tell the truth - I mean Covid-19 did come from an isolated Corona virus found in bats in around 2016. So, you know, vague brush with something true. This virus, though, appears to have gained much in the years since and it quite obvious came from the lab in Wuhan. But the masses will believe the tripe, ignore the stench and remain on the bench.

You tell me:

www.bitchute.com...

Things not generally known

www.bitchute.com...

originally posted by: JBurns
"Animals" ?

Eating bats and/or household pets (yes, those sickos kill little puppies and kittens) is NOT eating animals. That in itself is negligent. Must be a left wing thing, they do it in Venezuela too. Amazing how the civilized world (US, Japan, Russian, Italy, Brazil, etc) don't eat our precious little pets

But I don't believe the WHO for one second. They, along with every other "institution," are entirely discredited

To Indian people we eat a holy animal (cow)

What evidence is there that it did originate from a lab? It's not the first time there's a pandemic going on.
Why should it be different than countless other times throughout history of mankind?

Whether it was from a lab or not, they had no choice but to say it wasn’t...it would have caused world war three reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

Also pay no attention to the Wuhan researchers who were the first to show symptoms of COVID in the fall of 2019.

news.sky.com...

www.reuters.com... -in-august-idUSKBN23G0OM

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: XCrycek

Because SARS also was originated in China as epicenter, now SARS/Covid, both similar, both became deadly in china, coincidence? two virus that has been around for a long time.

China has been playing god with viruses, the only way this viruses can become deadly or been transmitted to humans like SARS did is when DNA is been tampered with.

But I am just speculating here.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
If you view the WHO as some sort of semi-reliable professional source......you’re a moron

The WHO is as reliable and professional as the UN.

Not reliable at all. Not professional at all and ONE HUNDRED PERCENT bought and paid for

If the WHO (or the UN) is saying it, it’s false

Precisely. The World Health Organization primarily exists for sounding alarms. Their ability to forensically "investigate" the origin of diseases is next to nothing.

Before the Covid pandemic, the WHO was under intense criticism for wasting most the money that was donated to them. Houses, Vacations, Cars, Parties.... I'm sure everyone has (by now) seen the 20 sec clip of the "strange" WHO party.

All I have to say to that is..bullsh#t!!! this ia an engineered virus.

Not only is the UN's WHO highly suspicious - remember when they were going broke in 2019 - (Right before the current "World health Crisis" lets take a look at one of the investigators ....

WHO team heads to China bat lab at the center of coronavirus conspiracies

Peter Daszak, a member of the WHO team currently in Wuhan and president of EcoHealth Alliance, an environmental health non-profit, said he was confident in the lab's safety protocols.
"I know that lab really well," said Daszak, who has worked closely with virologist Shi in the past.
"It is a good virology lab that was doing good work that got close to finding what the next SARS-related coronavirus would be. But it didn't find it as far as I know. But you know, unfortunately, it maybe got so close that people now ironically start to blame it."

Now the RUB
A conflict of interest: How can Peter Daszak, a British scientist who helped fund controversial experiments on coronaviruses by China's Batwoman, be part of WHO’s team investigating the original source of the outbreak?

Peter Daszak’s organisation channelled cash to Wuhan scientists at the centre of growing concerns over a cover-up – and also collaborated on the sort of cutting-edge experiments on coronaviruses banned for several years in the United States for fear of sparking a pandemic.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been carrying out this risky research on bat viruses since 2015, including the collection of new coronaviruses and hugely controversial ‘gain of function’ experiments that increase their ability to infect humans.

Nothing to see here LoL
$3.5 Billion Has Flowed From U.S. Taxpayers To The World Health Organization Since 2010

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
"Indeed, the latest report now is it’s a 15% fatality rate, which is more than SARS at 83% infection rate.

???

15% CFR?!?

Sorry, that is demonstrably nonsensical.

Also, you can't compare fatality rate to infection rate. Those are two totally different and unrelated things.

a reply to: JAGStorm

But cows aren't known for carrying zoonotic diseases either

Wet markets are provably dangerous and negligent

And for god's sake people everywhere STOP EATING POOR LITTLE KITTENS AND DOGS it piss me off that animal is defenseless

originally posted by: JBurns
But cows aren't known for carrying zoonotic diseases either

Yes they are.

Just the NA stock is known to carry 15 types.

Tis why there are so many rules on how to handle their products. From milk to leather.

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: JAGStorm

But cows aren't known for carrying zoonotic diseases either

Wet markets are provably dangerous and negligent

And for god's sake people everywhere STOP EATING POOR LITTLE KITTENS AND DOGS it piss me off that animal is defenseless

You heard of mad cow disease?

The city in which the virus originated has a path lab.

There are no coincidences in macropolitics.