U.S. Navy controls inventions that claim to change "fabric of reality"

This reminds me of a thread last week about UAP theory.
this is a link to the theory from that thread,a lot of reading but interesting.
UAP Theory

I'm more interested in tech that cloaks people. They're all around us. We just can't see them.

Additional:

www.thedrive.com...

All you need to do is build up a super high voltage and low amp charge surrounding a ship and it will skim through any medium. This would take a special metal that creates a constant energy shield around the vehicle that pushes away the medium without the metal touching it. The image we see in a mirror is caused by the reflection of light by an energy barrier which is actually away from the glass, the image never actually touches the glass. The shape of the vehicle is critical, pushing the medium to the side. This is also how our aircraft fly, the air never actually touches the metal itself, it creates an energy barrier that moves away the air.

I am not a physicist, so I do not have the financial backing to test how to best accomplish this, but evidently there are some people who have that ability and evidently the technology has been created already.

a reply to: infolurker

Maybe. The patents for stealth paint were available, and still are. I think it was Joe Reznick who filed them.

originally posted by: HunkaHunka

Among Dr. Pais's patents are designs, approved in 2018, for an aerospace-underwater craft of incredible speed and maneuverability. This cone-shaped vehicle can potentially fly as well anywhere it may be, whether air, water or space, without leaving any heat signatures. It can achieve so by being able to create a quantum vacuum around itself with a very dense polarized energy field. This vacuum would allow it to repel any molecule the craft comes in contact with, no matter the medium. Manipulating "quantum field fluctuations in the local vacuum energy state," would help reduce the craft's inertia. The polarized vacuum would dramatically reduce any elemental resistance and lead to "extreme speeds," claims the paper.

Big Think


I haven’t done the background research into Dr Pais, but if he is legit, this could mean some huge changes to our species as a whole.

I really want to call him a egocentric quack, but it seems that his credentials may be bonafide.

Does anyone have anything else on this guy, as the technology seems downright fantastic.

KESHE HAS ALREADY PUNTED HUMANITY 1000 YEARS INTO THE FUTURE.... yes roll out the suppressed technology because if you dont someone else will now......People have figured it out now anyways...there is no stopping it now....once the floodgates open many many Countries have People who know about and can build AND MASS PRODUCE this technology already.....there has been a Global Embargo on releasing tis technology and the System is backed up and there is pent up dEmand....this will happen almost overnight because all Countries have been held back but are knowledgable and ready to move forward if allowed to do so.

Besides if I had the Money I could build a Neutral-Dimension Craft right now today myself using online resources found within the Public Domain.....the problem has always been staying alive while you do it....and if you operate it....anyone can build these Craft its seriously LOW TECH...just suppressed hidden heretofore unknown tech.

a reply to: HunkaHunka

I suspect Navy Recruiters have been altering reality for decades.

a reply to: gortex

if i wanted someone to build me a sturdy space craft where weight is no problem i would have them make it in a submarine doc and make a pretty much exactly same nuclear sub

you strange sub would make a great spaceship

and going on long haul silent trips are already in use by the Navy on the earth version of their space craft.


i argue you could use the same crews and with some cloak and dagger(sleep agent or whatever) they might not even realize they are in space

Oh, unbelievers.

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: gortex

if i wanted someone to build me a sturdy space craft where weight is no problem i would have them make it in a submarine doc and make a pretty much exactly same nuclear sub

you strange sub would make a great spaceship

and going on long haul silent trips are already in use by the Navy on the earth version of their space craft.


i argue you could use the same crews and with some cloak and dagger(sleep agent or whatever) they might not even realize they are in space

Subs make great Spaceships just the way they are....shape is irrelevant....just kind of ugly looking IMHO.

This technology reminds me of a unexplained sighting I had on August 15, 2009. It was definitely UFO, but I always thought it was likely a government "project" because, yes, it was the bright orange-reddish circle object but as it went directly over my head, the center lighting went more blueish and had a strange wavey aura about it.

It was about 10:00 pm at night and I was sitting on my living room chair talking on phone when I saw a bright light out the picture window coming from southern sky, at first thought it was a helicopter but it was too bright so I ran outside into yard and it flew, a little faster than a plane would have, directly over our house right in the city of Hayward, WI and as it passed over I saw that it was a circular object with a bright orange-red glow at the center with very dim lights going out to a circle and there was no sound whatsoever, but the aura was like a wavey blue light only for that split second it was directly over me. Otherwise it appeared to more of the orange-reddish ball.

I called my wife out and she also saw it as it was already passed our house but we both watched cruise North until it was out of view. It probably lasted nearly a minute for the whole sighting. I never ran for camera cuz it just happened too fast.

I made a report to NUFORC and Peter Davenport and Jeff Rense called me and put me on the Rense radio show and I explained to them that it had rained that night and I checked the weather and the clouds were at 3,700 feet so it was somewhere below that level but at least 2,000 feet I guessed. There was no sound whatsoever so I know it wasn’t a plane or helicopter. Davenport and Rense suggested it was probably the size of a 10x10 bedroom.

I called local police to see if they had any reports, he mentioned meteor showers that night but there was no way that was a meteor, moved way to steady in flight in straight line and height and too slow across sky and below the clouds.

First time and last time I ever experienced something like that. I think it was some government technology not shared with us yet and that was back in 2009.

Craziest part of it was that Davenport said there were reports coming in from all over that night of these orange balls. All heading south to north across the country and even a report in the UK. The path that I saw at 10:00 pm, he said there was reports further south in Chicago area and southern Wisconsin an hour and half before my sighting and then a little after my sighting north in northern MN and into Canada. You can check on these reports on NUFORC datebase for August 15, 2009.

I've seen the DRIVE articles and keep wondering to myself.....WHY

In a nutshell they detail the research carried out on one particular scientist's theories and even, in some cases, testable experiments but again...WHY

If all of this would be true....why would we even know it. Why would these patents be available to see. Why would any research or historical information be available via FOI requests to a public website? Do you think any of the stuff they test at Area 51 has patents you can look up? Details on systems you can get via FOI? I think we know the answer there.

So again...WHY?

Reading the comments in the articles carries a common line of thinking that these are being publicized simply as a smokescreen. Either a response to some research done by other nations or the planting of seeds of disinfo.

Take it with a grain of salt.

It's still cool though to wonder....What If

Who knows whether this is a "real patent" or not but if it was it sounds like it would solve the issue of radiation during deep space travel and several other issues. I can say that if it was legitimate that it would likely require a functioning fusion reactor to even begin work because of the massive levels of energy required to create these effects on a practical/significant scale. Personally I think the disinformation line of thinking seems quite valid. He's either a madman, a disinformation shill, or a mad genius the likes of which the world has never seen.

Of course he could just be keeping himself in a job with crazy uprovable patents with superiors who accept a lot of sci-fi handwaving because they have no idea what they're talking about. The classic situation of an incompetent boss.

a reply to: Morbidlynx

I hadn’t thought about that.... but you’re right

originally posted by: HunkaHunka
Big Think

I don't see where that article adds anything to TheDrive article published over a year ago.

originally posted by: TXRabbit
So again...WHY?

Reading the comments in the articles carries a common line of thinking that these are being publicized simply as a smokescreen. Either a response to some research done by other nations or the planting of seeds of disinfo.

The only answer that makes any sense to me is to answer this question in TheDrive article in the affirmative:

Are they part of a misinformation campaign designed to lead America’s adversaries on a fruitless wild goose chase?

If the patents can convince Russia and China to devote resources chasing this "pie in the sky", that's less resources they will be able to devote to something which actually works. I can't think of any other reason that makes sense why the patents would be filed publicly. If they actually worked they would be filed in secret, as the same article suggests:

It’s also worth noting the well-established trend of the U.S. military making use of the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 to file patents unavailable for public viewing, under which the Navy has been the most prolific filer since 2017. It seems particularly notable that Pais's patents, which according to top Navy officials were of major national security interest, were filed publicly, though the reason why remains elusive.

If the goal is to get Russia and China to waste their limited research resources, then the reason for filing publicly is not elusive at all, since using the invention secrecy act wouldn't achieve that goal.

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: HunkaHunka

Hmmmm

If this was real, the patents would be classified no?

The Navy uses the invention secrecy act all the time and I see no reason why they wouldn't use it for such amazing tech if it actually worked.

It’s all based on quintessence theory, which is bunk.

a reply to: 00018GE

so we dont live in a nutarian world?(broadly)

originally posted by: Arbitrageur


Are they part of a misinformation campaign designed to lead America’s adversaries on a fruitless wild goose chase?

If the patents can convince Russia and China to devote resources chasing this "pie in the sky", that's less resources they will be able to devote to something which actually works. I can't think of any other reason that makes sense why the patents would be filed publicly. If they actually worked they would be filed in secret, as the same article suggests:




This is a good point.
I can think of a couple of incidents where this has happened in the past-
The Soviets managed to make the US believe that they had far more nukes than they did,resulting in the US building loads more to level the field.That was time,research,resources and money that was spent unneccesarily.

Also,the US became convinced that the Soviets had "psychotronic"weaponry(which is debatable)-leading to the MK Ultra program.

In the case of the Dr Pais patents-it looks as though something similar may be happening.
According to the link below,the Navy started to delve into this research with Dr Pais because they think China are working on similar technology:

the Chief Technical Officer (CTO) of the Naval Aviation Enterprise personally wrote a letter addressed to the examiner claiming that the U.S. needs the patent as the Chinese are already “investing significantly” in these aerospace technologies that sound eerily similar to the UFOs reported by Navy pilots in now well-known encounters. This raises the question, are the Chinese developing or even already flying craft leveraging similar advanced technology and is the Navy now scrambling to catch up?

www.thedrive.com...

a reply to: HunkaHunka

Sounds like an SCP to me.

Reality benders and all that jazz.

a reply to: HunkaHunka

I did a thread on room temperature superconductor.

It was infuriating to say the least because it was, “first, techno talk.,, next, do magic... results in RTSC...”

Absolutely no details. As a person, seems a legit scientist. A weird way of talking (and writing). The patents are there to read as are several presentations on the subject (including a transcript of at least the intro), and it how science as we know it works (pushing mass around requires work, usually fuel, so get rid of mass and velocity increases.

But there are no details!

Yet, research is showing that frequency does seem to induce SC in materials.

phys.org...

But these are lasers, not radio waves, but it is not that much difference: EM waves can kick start SC in a material!

This not the first time either! This effect has been known for years, yet, it is only now that the pleebs get to hear about it?

It is like NASA and the slow, painful leak to extraterrestrial life. Sad, really. I want off this rock!!