Leaked report shows German nuns were renting out young boys for rape orgies

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Up to 400 children died at a Scottish orphanage run by nuns and were buried in a single unmarked grave, new research has revealed.

I'm trying to understand that statement, did the 400 die all at once? of they just leave a big hole in the ground and toss a body in now and again? It doesn't sound right.

a reply to: vonclod

Another good question. And I hate when shjt don't add up?
That's how innocent people get screwed and the guilty walk
sometimes. And we can't have that.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: vonclod

Another good question. And I hate when shjt don't add up?
That's how innocent people get screwed and the guilty walk
sometimes. And we can't have that.

Yes, I'm for the truth, someone close to me is dealing with a weird situation, innocent, close to getting screwed, the issue was discovered to not have happened..but a bit late now, lot's of damage to repair.

I'm all for this stuff being exposed, and I'm no fan of the Catholic Churches history, so, no issue with stuff brought to light..but I agree with you, the "pedo" thing seems some catch all slander. This stuff better be proven.

a reply to: vonclod

This stuff better be proven.

The harsh reality is some courts seem to almost embrace a
lynch mob mentality. They don't like prosecuting someone and
finding out they had the wrong person completely. And that has
a lot to do with social status as well. A respected academic has a
far better chance of getting a fair trial than say a homeless person
nobody gives a crap about. But that still means a guilty person walks
without a care in the world. The case is closed. Forget all that. If
everybody does their job to the hilt. Even then mistakes can be made.
Ya we see eye to eye on that.

I cannot handle sick stories like this.. It wants me to punch holes in the wall.
I hope god will make them experience everything they have done to these kids.

Apparently there was an influx of gay men going into the Catholic priesthood in the 60s and 70s. Although, a quick glance at the history of the Catholic Church shows homosexuality was there since the earliest days, the Roman part essentially. What I personally heard was that gays flocked to the Catholic Church back then because it had a gay culture even though it was a closet one. Another theory proposes that straight priests created a void at that time because they left the church to get married.

In the last half century there’s also been an increased “gaying of the priesthood” in the West. Throughout the 1970s, several hundred men left the priesthood each year, many of them for marriage. As straight priests left the church for domestic bliss, the proportion of remaining priests who were gay grew. In a survey of several thousand priests in the U.S., the Los Angeles Times found that 28 percent of priests between the ages of 46 and 55 reported that they were gay. This statistic was higher than the percentages found in other age brackets and reflected the outflow of straight priests throughout the 1970s and ’80s.

Link to Article

a reply to: Randyvine

How do people react when a female teacher has sex with an underage boy, if the boy acts upset at all they are mocked and ridiculed.

No care about their actual mental health just you had sex be happy, now toss in raped by a same sex partner how many gay cracks did they endure if they ever talked about it.

Lastly toss in the power of the catholic church, in addition to the nuns probably beating into their heads that this was their fault for years...

Once mental health is fractured its a mean witch to fix.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Randyvine

How do people react when a female teacher has sex with an underage boy, if the boy acts upset at all they are mocked and ridiculed.

No care about their actual mental health just you had sex be happy, now toss in raped by a same sex partner how many gay cracks did they endure if they ever talked about it.

Lastly toss in the power of the catholic church, in addition to the nuns probably beating into their heads that this was their fault for years...

Once mental health is fractured its a mean witch to fix.

Okay try this on. You're exactly right because you know everything
about every case even before they happen. I'm an idiot. That work
for ya? If you're saying these nuns are guilty with out a fair trial
then where's your pitchfork?

What the hell is going on with the Catholic church and child abuse?

You mean the world and child rape and murder.

a reply to: Randyvine

nope never said that, just if the story is true what I suggested could easily lead to people not talking.

There are a laundry list of reasons well documented on why victims of assault dont speak out, that does not mean the nuns are guilty.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Randyvine

nope never said that, just if the story is true what I suggested could easily lead to people not talking.

There are a laundry list of reasons well documented on why victims of assault dont speak out, that does not mean the nuns are guilty.

Well that's fair enough then. I don't disagree with you.

a reply to: trollz

Where would a coven of witches hide in plain sight, where would priests of Satan hide in plain site.

Long has the church fought internally against enemy's that have infiltrated from outside, enemy's whose intention was to gain position and power over the Christian flock, wolves in sheep's clothing prowling and hunting.

How many good priests and good nun's have died at there hands', been forced into silence by there cabal's.


Make no mistake the church still exists but these people were NOT nun's, not in God's sight or that of the Church whose oath's they broke but these were definitely Satanic witches.

You will find such predators in all walk's of life, today they make there home in politics, police, social services and anywhere that they can prey upon there intended victim's.


Do not accuse the Church of the crimes of Satan, these fiend's were to be found and some still are in every church except the few that are heavily persecuted were they may be called to die for a faith they don't have, so you will find them were Church's have power in THIS WORLD, were they are above reproach and can be used to cover such behaviour.

Irish Monk's that were child abusers and had gay orgies for example but for every bad monk there are many good ones, for every man that seeks to use the church for evil there are a score that do it seeking GOD.

Also remember Possession, spiritual warfare within the church itself.

All that I can say is that these were NEVER real nun's they were witches and devil worshipers and will pay a price to the Lord for there insult, an unforgivable insult to the holy spirit perpetrated by there crime, they will be withered from there root to there bough and nothing of them will remain, these are creatures whose very beings whose very soul's the water of life shall be taken away from.

The children they abused, you know what they are even if they know it not today and most understandably hate the church for what they suffered, perhaps even turned away from God because of the horror of what they suffered, well God has never turned away from them, they are REALLY his living martyrs and will see his justice come down upon there persecutors.

The Devil too has his mockery of the church remember this, he places it wherever the church is for the sole intent of destroying the Church, people turn in disgust and do not discern his hand instead blaming God and that makes the devil laugh but he who laughs last?.

These creatures are the very worst that humanity has, I doubt there soul's were even native to there body's as they acted in pure and utter anti Christian evil toward these children.

The Church institution has been diseased for a long time, visions of the Virgin Mary and even of Jesus have condemned the wicked clergy repeatedly now you know why, there is still a Church there but these vile and wicked creatures were NEVER truly a part of it instead they were sent by THERE Father the devil to destroy it.

Do you know why the Catholics, Orthodox and other denominations PRAY for there leaders both religious and political, for the church because they know the devil is always assaulting the church and the same goes for all denominations, they know that his servant's walk among the clergy and stand beside them in the pew's but they also know that God will sort his from the devils come judgement day.

To give up and just let the devil have the Church, well who win's on that one, the Church still exists, true martyrs are made every day like this children or like men and woman and children butchered for there faith in Christ.

Paganism, devil worship and worse walk our world, the church wrested back from the control it's enemy is stronger than you know, it protects both body and soul.

See a congregation, not a lip service congregation only there because it is the way there town work's but one who all seek and BELIEVE in Christ, see a devil priest walk in and watch him either converted or thrown out by the angels and maybe even by the holy spirit who see's the faith of these people.


These children will be avenged by there father in heaven.



Cast your mind back to WW2, Nazis and Resistance, the same problem the devil loved the Nazi's and had many within the Church during and even after the war that helped them to escape or worked with them during the war.

Meanwhile God has many good servant's and TRUE nun's and TRUE monk's and True clergy within the church, they sheltered and protected Jewish people and children as well as others the NAZI's hunted and many of them died for this.

So there have always been TWO church's, the church of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and the Temple of the Devil that infiltrated and corrupted through both corporal and spiritual mean's.

Make no mistake it will be better for those who died in Sodom and Gomorrah than it shall be for those that did this to children in CHRISTS care.

Do you think there has EVER been peace for the church in the past 2000 years, no it has been constant war the devil and his army's against Christs faithful on earth, it has not stopped and you fear bomb's from the east or the west when every day spiritual atomic warfare is rained down upon your soul's by the devil.

But he has not won, he never will even when Christians are diminished to just a handful of persecuted people before the end.

Notice how the devil loads his weapon within the very body of Christ then uses it to ACCUSE the body of Christ, to drive out and scatter the flock of Christians so that his servant's the wolves may more easily prey upon them.


The devil and his servants WILL pay for what they have done and for them the fate is far worse than death.

When all those old witch hunts were being perpetrated by the church who do you really think was doing all that killing and torturing, Christians doing as Christ told them to do or Devils corrupting the church into something it was never meant to be?.

Christians are NOT to associate with the immoral or those that refuse the word of God, those like these nun's were NOT Christians, they were immoral and refused the word of Christ so much so that they even made mockery of it in vile corrupted ceremony that God probably found offensive beyond even our horror at what these children suffered.

In each of these children was Christ, each would is his wound and the nun's that did this are destined not for any heaven, you would not want to go were they are going.

a reply to: LABTECH767

A long post, but I enjoyed your perspective.

A more secular point of view would be that child abusers are attracted to positions of authority that make it possible for them to engage in their evil activities. The position holds enough power to control their victims and maintain their cover, something that will help them seem beyond accusation.

If they can continue their dark practices without getting caught, these activities will only escalate and become more extreme over the years they get away with it. To non-believers, these nuns, priests, and johns have issues that can be explained psychologically, medically, and in other secular ways. Given enough twisted liberal logic, I could even see some people believing that the abusers were the real victims in a case like this.

I like your explanation, although it still leaves some room for the abusers to claim to be the victims of Satanic influences, that the abused children were a means for the devil to get to the clergy and smear God. I personally believe that there are evil spiritual influences. Call these influences Satanic or a product of a damaged mind or whatever you want, but don't use that to try to shift the blame from the psychopaths that committed these truly evil acts.

The inquisition, as evil as that was, would be the perfect way to punish these evil priestly pretenders. Why wait for their eternal punishment when you can kick it off before they are dead? Plus the irony of using the corrupt Church to engage in the worst kind of illegal torture as physical punishment for these evil dirtbags would be fitting.

I think you are all missing some thing!
The Catholic nuns and priests are totaly EVIL satanic.
its bad when the church its self is Satanicly evil.

originally posted by: Boadicea
Not to excuse any abuse in any way, but I suspect that there is more to this than we're being told, and it may not be exactly what we're being told.

I am quite disturbed and curious as to why it was the Archdiocese asked to conduct this investigation, and not law enforcement authorities. Why would anyone trust a report by the Archidiocese essentially investigating themselves? Apparently they did find some incriminating evidence, but that seems to be questionable itself.

Haucke, who led the victims' group of those who survived the nuns until he resigned over the censoring of the report, says Woelki told them in October 2020 that the report was not “legally watertight” and contained “inadmissible prejudices” against the Catholic church that were fed by scandals going on elsewhere. “The survivors were used again,” he said, referring to their cooperation in the report only to have it kept private.

Would that be why the focus is only on the nuns? Rather than those men who actually inflicted the abuse?

The report names various German businessmen and complicit clergy who “rented” the young boys from the nuns who ran a convent in Speyer, Germany between the 1960s and 1970s.

Why are those men not being named?

And is it possible that the nuns were not the ones actually running the show? Perhaps not even aware (tho probably suspicious) of what was actually going on? I'm not Catholic, but as I understand it, nuns (women) are subservient to the priests and other clergy (men.) Especially back in the 60s and 70s.

This is not to say the victims are lying, but I very much doubt they had the all the facts to judge the situation by, nor the critical thinking skills to process it. I just think there's much more to this.

Why are you defending the nuns? Generally it’s the pimp, not the John who’s the one you put most of your attention on? Oh wait, wahmenz right. There is zero defense for selling children and you want to ignore it. It really spits in the face of toxic masculinity and the purity of those born with more proper genitalia. Sexist, and no veil how scandalous!

a reply to: Rob808

Why are you defending the nuns?

Excuse me? You really want to go there? Okay.

At no time did I defend anyone or anything.

Generally it’s the pimp, not the John who’s the one you put most of your attention on?

Which is exactly what I did. Only I didn't LIMIT my focus to the nuns. Rather, I included the disgusting perverts that actually did the dirty deeds. The MEN. Why are you not putting most of your attention on the MEN who actually committed the abuse?

Oh wait, wahmenz right.

Well, yes, actually... women who were very much under the direction and control of MEN. But... oh wait... MENZ, right??? We'll just pretend like laws did not subjugate women to men's will in those days, right? We'll just pretend like the Catholic church is a matriarchy rather than a PATRIARCHY, right? We'll just pretend like it was the nuns squirting their jizz all over these boys, right? Because... MENZ, right???

There is zero defense for selling children...

Yup. Zero defense for selling children... and zero defense for sexually abusing children.

...and you want to ignore it.

No. I'm not the one ignoring anything or anyone. I'm the one trying to point out that the nuns did not act alone, and quite possibly did not act of their own volition, and sure as hell did not do the dirty deeds themselves. That was the MENZ. You could throw every single one of those nuns in jail, burn them at the stake, whatever... and the MENZ will find other ways to victimize children.

But you just want to ignore that, right? Because MENZ. Why do YOU want to give the MENZ a free pass to abuse and victimize even MORE children???

It really spits in the face of toxic masculinity and the purity of those born with more proper genitalia. Sexist, and no veil how scandalous!

You are literally displaying toxic masculinity by your very refusal to blame the men and insistence on blaming only the women.

Toxic masculinity indeed.

a reply to: vonclod

I saw a nun in a bright red Mustang once. I thought to myself 'That must be one slutty nun.'

a reply to: network dude

Agreed I simply just don't understand why anyone would want to have any kind of sexual relationship with a child! WTF?? And Nuns?? now Nuns too?? someone hit the reset button and fast.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Rob808

Why are you defending the nuns?

Excuse me? You really want to go there? Okay.

At no time did I defend anyone or anything.

Generally it’s the pimp, not the John who’s the one you put most of your attention on?

Which is exactly what I did. Only I didn't LIMIT my focus to the nuns. Rather, I included the disgusting perverts that actually did the dirty deeds. The MEN. Why are you not putting most of your attention on the MEN who actually committed the abuse?

Oh wait, wahmenz right.

Well, yes, actually... women who were very much under the direction and control of MEN. But... oh wait... MENZ, right??? We'll just pretend like laws did not subjugate women to men's will in those days, right? We'll just pretend like the Catholic church is a matriarchy rather than a PATRIARCHY, right? We'll just pretend like it was the nuns squirting their jizz all over these boys, right? Because... MENZ, right???

There is zero defense for selling children...

Yup. Zero defense for selling children... and zero defense for sexually abusing children.

...and you want to ignore it.

No. I'm not the one ignoring anything or anyone. I'm the one trying to point out that the nuns did not act alone, and quite possibly did not act of their own volition, and sure as hell did not do the dirty deeds themselves. That was the MENZ. You could throw every single one of those nuns in jail, burn them at the stake, whatever... and the MENZ will find other ways to victimize children.

But you just want to ignore that, right? Because MENZ. Why do YOU want to give the MENZ a free pass to abuse and victimize even MORE children???

It really spits in the face of toxic masculinity and the purity of those born with more proper genitalia. Sexist, and no veil how scandalous!

You are literally displaying toxic masculinity by your very refusal to blame the men and insistence on blaming only the women.

Toxic masculinity indeed.

It's not an either/or for me on this. The men and women both deserve to be scrutinized and punished. The nuns were complicit when they could have banded together and brought to light what was going on, but they didn't most likely because they were profiting from it.

I personally give them no pass. I won't make excuses for anyone who does this kind of thing.

There is no evidence that the women were forced to do it, but you come across as trying to have the men more guilty as if they were coercing the women to do it. Bring forth some evidence, otherwise the male clergy, business men, and nuns are all equally guilty.

a reply to: AutomateThis1

It's not an either/or for me on this. The men and women both deserve to be scrutinized and punished. The nuns were complicit when they could have banded together and brought to light what was going on, but they didn't most likely because they were profiting from it.

I personally give them no pass. I won't make excuses for anyone who does this kind of thing.

There is no evidence that the women were forced to do it, but you come across as trying to have the men more guilty as if they were coercing the women to do it. Bring forth some evidence, otherwise the male clergy, business men, and nuns are all equally guilty.

I gave no free pass to anyone. And if you had read my original comment, then you would also know that I quoted from the original article linked that priests and other clergy were among the abusers, those who transported the kids, and most likely the ones who made the connections with the other prominent men who were also abusing these kids. I asked why these men were not also named and shamed. I asked why this wasn't a criminal investigation, but one conducted by the church.

I also said that if the nuns did not know, that they at least had suspicions. Suspicions which they chose to ignore. Or, perhaps their world is just as damn corrupted as ours is, and they did report it, and it was covered up. Or, as you stated, they were profiting from the abuse. It's a possibility. I don't know, and you sure as hell don't either. But I'm not the one ignoring the very clear and obvious guilt of the men involved. Not to mention their absolutely vile perversions either.

As I have already stated, throw the nuns in jail, burn them at the stake, do whatever you like. WILL THE ABUSE STOP THERE???

No. And you know that as well as I do. I've already acknowledged the nuns played a role in this. I just want a better investigation and explanation than "the nuns" or "the womenz". Then let the chips fall where they may. But you are quite happy to put all the blame on the nuns, and give the men a free pass to abuse again. And you think YOU have the moral high ground? Pfft.