posted on Feb, 3 2021 @ 11:11 AM
a reply to:
ketsuko
I guess it depends on their admission criteria and if there is diminishing return on the scores / gpa relative to academic performance. The reality
is they won't see huge increases in other minorities but they may move the needle a little bit.
The question is how much lower test scores and GPA can they accept without affecting academic performance? I highly doubt there is a meaningful
difference between student A who may score in 99% percentile vs student B who may be in 95th? So when trying to bring more diversity into the
student body, they have to holistically look to see if say a black kid in the 95th would do ok at the school.
For example, I did my MBA at an elite graduate school. The school has more applicants that spots available even if they only admitted those with 4.0
GPAs and near perfect GMAT scores (standardized test used for business schools). So the GMAT and GPA may get you looked at, but your essays and
previous work experience are far more important for admissions.
All of this is a delicate balance and I see both sides of the issue. This is largely what the affirmative action debate is about.
I think what many people miss from the debate is that often times schools want to create the best OVERALL environment for learning and many times that
means you have to focus on things other than one dimensional scores.
Tossing out scores entirely doesn't make sense to me at high achieving school such as the one in the story, but I can see where they may feel they
need to tweak the criteria a little bit as well.