It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In a paper published in January, members of the Canadian Institute For Advanced Research’s humans and microbiome program raised the possibility the pandemic could profoundly change the human microbiome, making some people more susceptible to chronic conditions and diseases, including asthma and obesity.
It gives us an experiment that you can’t normally do: If you lock people up for a year, does it have long-term consequences?” said Finlay. The paper, he said, is a call for scientists to study the issue, especially its impact on young children.
The microbiome is made up of the microbes living on and in the human body that play a role in human health and disease. Changing that with use of antibiotics or by limiting contact with microorganisms, especially in early childhood, can have health consequences
Although sanitation and distancing to prevent the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (which causes COVID-19) are necessary to protect human life, scientists warn in the paper that people should be ready for changes to the human microbiome as a result.
That could result in health consequences. Allergic responses, asthma, obesity and diabetes have all been linked to changes in the human microbiome in recent decades due, in part, to less exposure to microorganisms.
He said growing rates of obesity, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease and other conditions, especially in children, have been linked to exposure to fewer microbes.
Physical distancing, alone, makes a difference to people’s exposure to microbes, something that is especially crucial for infants, he said.
“A child born today in a COVID world, who is that kid interacting with? They are not getting the microbes they are normally exposed to. We know in early life it is really important to have diverse microbial exposure, and that is just not happening in COVID, so I think there is some significant concern about what goes on there.”
originally posted by: crayzeed
This has ben known about since the early 1970s when the years before everybody was told to disinfect kitchen surfaces. Before then the disinfection products all promised to kill all known germs. After then, even till today, in their adverts they say they kill 99%, or some such figure, of germs. Please note their advertisements, whether it's disinfectant or toothpaste, the visuals always leave a little bit of plaque or germ.
I have always believed that this (plus chemicals in our food chain) has led to the proliferations of odd conditions.
When I was a child, in the 1950, if anyone had cancer it was the talk of the area, it was ultra rare. Also we never ever heard of anybody, children or adults, suffering from ADH, nut allergies, child cancer etc. etc. and we never thought about playing in a muddy stream, getting completely filthy with god knows how many "dangerous" germs.
originally posted by: Aliquandro
People afraid of germs should know this, one of the first things a mother elephant does after giving birth is feed it's baby some of her poop, because without the germs the babies digestive chemistry will never develop enough to be able to digest the plants they eat.
They should make soap with extra germs now to make up for past stupidity
originally posted by: halfoldman
a reply to: Aliquandro
Not just giraffes, but also human babies seem to require some poop during the birth process.
www.the-scientist.com...