It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: TheBadCabbie
I think if Sidney said things that aren't true, and she knows they aren't true, her clients may be in some trouble but not her. She has certain protections as an attorney.
I think if Sidney can prove what she has said is true or she did not saying anything false maliciously (IOW, she has a reasonable belief what she's said is true), then Dominion will lose.
Just my .02¢
Wasn’t she acting alone in her claims against Dominion?
She certainly wasn’t working for Trump, his team made that clear.
No, she had clients she represented.
originally posted by: TheBadCabbie
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: TheBadCabbie
I think if Sidney said things that aren't true, and she knows they aren't true, her clients may be in some trouble but not her. She has certain protections as an attorney.
I think if Sidney can prove what she has said is true or she did not saying anything false maliciously (IOW, she has a reasonable belief what she's said is true), then Dominion will lose.
Just my .02¢
Wasn’t she acting alone in her claims against Dominion?
She certainly wasn’t working for Trump, his team made that clear.
No, she had clients she represented.
Who were her clients?
originally posted by: TheBadCabbie
It's possible that this is some subtle legal strategy on her part. It seems unlikely that she would make such strong claims, knowing that those claims would get her sued, unless there were some underlying motive.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: MotherMayEye
If she had it then why did she quietly drop her lawsuit against Georgia this week?
originally posted by: bastion
originally posted by: crayzeed
It's quite easy to see what their game is. Why didn't Dominion sue her at the time of the supposed libel? The reason now is they've had time to clean out their system of ANY proof of fraud thereby taking the evidence to prove she was right.
Because it was investigated by the FBI...
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
And, of course, if the affidavit from Italy is genuine...she has something there, too, that's more than just hearsay.
In a motion filed at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Powell and the other attorneys on the suit agreed with the defendants, included among them Gov. Brian Kemp and Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger, to have the case dismissed.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: highvein
I think that Dominion knows that they will be subject to disclosure, don't you? They don't seem to be worried about it.
If Sidney wins this case it will mean only that she did not defame Dominion. Defamation is a legal term.
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: TheBadCabbie
I believe that this is a very Bad idea from Dominion, unless they have done nothing wrong. If Sidney wins this case that means that Dominion did indeed fake an election. Class action lawsuit from 75 million people. How much is your vote worth?