It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
And my avatar is an ancient troll who sat down on his haunches to munch a little granola and was petrified by an alien petrification beam in 1158 AD.
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
To me, this looks like a natural rock formation that was created because this whole area used to be under water. Lime deposits settled at the bottom of this "sea" and over millions of years, it was washed away leaving various shapes. By way of illustration, at the extreme southern tip of Illinois, (which is quite near the same area of the OP), in the Shawnee National Forest, there is an area called "Garden Of The Gods." It is world famous because there is a rock shaped like a camel. It is, of course, known as Camel Rock. It was sculpted because of the ancient waters it used to lie beneath. Here's a recent picture of Camel Rock I took on November 4th, 2020 and you can clearly discern the shape does indeed resemble a camel:
Unlike some nasty people on here, who's initials are not "Trade Marked," I think it's a fascinating find and think it's quite interesting. I just wanted to add to the discussion like a normal, non-loony, person.
TCB
originally posted by: Baddogma
I'd agree that it is not "natural" looking, though nature does make right angles when rock fractures at times.
It's small and likely man made by ancient folk, native Amerindian or settler.
It could be antediluvian, too, sure, but it lacks the grandeur and presence we associate with "Sphinxies."
If subsequent excavation brings up a grid of streets and ten foot marble pedestals mounted with still-functioning power crystals ...then the land owner would be mad and the Smithsonian would cover it back up.
originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
Looks like petrified wood, covered in dirt and mud. At the start where he films the vertical surface on the right, it looks like rings that a tree stump would have.
duckduckgo.com...
*I took plenty of videos of the sphinx to grab stills from, I did take too many photos of the ground but I was trying to document the rubble. While these rocks can commonly break off at 90 angles... where did they break off from? They're loose, out of place stones, indicating to me that they were moved there to begin with before being washed downstream a bit.
originally posted by: Lazarus Short
I'm impressed that among so many photos, there are SO FEW of the Sphinx itself. Except for one or two, we only get to see multiple photos of the lower part. I'm intrigued, but not convinced. The videos are barely relevant.
originally posted by: Baddogma
I'd agree that it is not "natural" looking, though nature does make right angles when rock fractures at times.
It's small and likely man made by ancient folk, native Amerindian or settler.
It could be antediluvian, too, sure, but it lacks the grandeur and presence we associate with "Sphinxies."
If subsequent excavation brings up a grid of streets and ten foot marble pedestals mounted with still-functioning power crystals ...then the land owner would be mad and the Smithsonian would cover it back up.