It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nivhk
She should be set free since it wasn't enough to change the election.
Isn't that the precedent set atm?
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: Nivhk
She should be set free since it wasn't enough to change the election.
Isn't that the precedent set atm?
No it is not the precedent. So far there have been a handful of voter fraud cases uncovered during the 2020 election, in various states--somebody voting in the name of their deceased spouse or their daughter, etc. They've all been reported, investigated, and prosecuted where the local authorities think they have a case. This one will be treated in exactly the same way.
The numberer 2020 appears to be a bit lower than an average year. The conservative Heritage foundation has tried to do an accounting of voter fraud in the US at their website:
www.heritage.org...
Their records, which span the 38 years from 1982 to 2020 contain a total of 1308 confirmed cases of voter fraud, which averages to about 34 per year. For 2020, they only show 15. Considering that there were an estimated 161 million voters in the 2020 election, either estimate would point to less than 1 voter in a million committing fraud.
originally posted by: chiefsmom
LMAO.
So,
PROOF!!!!! There had to be, for her to be arrested, correct?
So, proof there was fraud.
Not that I didn't believe, since I live in MI, and it happened here, but where are all those on this site that said absolutely not?
originally posted by: Nivhk
She should be set free since it wasn't enough to change the election.
Isn't that the precedent set atm?
originally posted by: lakenheath24
Well hell, a couple million more of these arrests and the ole Trumpster may just have a case.