I saw this phrase in another post and I'm at my wits end. I can't understand why this has been allowed to happen. I've tried to understand the
arguments. I've tried to understand the reasoning. I can't.
The election of November 3 was changed. The process. The reason cited was corona virus. I get that. I think the changes were unreasonable but I
can't deny they were neccesary. What we got was a circus given the cognomen "election". Fine.
Tens of millions of mail-in ballots. Substantial changes to an election system, tried and true though not without flaws, to an untested and unproven
new system. A system with minimal checks and balances. A system overwhelmed by modifications. This cannot be disputed.
Here is where I lose the plot. It stands to reason the validation of this system be a top priority. A thourough, transparent, impartial and
nationwide audit. After all, if the system can be changed due to the corona virus pandemic surely the validation process should be changed as well.
This hasn't happened. Why?
Here is where I'll address the arguments. I'll list only a few of the more assinine ones.
Assertion: No court has proven fraud occured.
Answer: Of course not. It is impossible to prove fraud without the proper procedure. The first step is to audit the vote. The results of that
audit lead to the next step. The next step is dependant on those results. The above assertion does not hold water because it skips the begining of
the process, assumes the results of the audit being in the negative(no fraud) and creates the argument from that point. In a sense this assertion is
fraud.
Assertion: An audit will disenfranchise voters.
Answer: A neccesary consequence of the changes made to the election system. It is impossible for an untried and untested to system to be without
error. To allow these errors to stand without challenge is the greater crime.
Assertion: There was not enough fraud to change the election.
Answer: Impossible to know without the audit.
Assertion: There was enough fraud to change the election
Answer: Impossible to know without the audit.
Assertion: Voting machines used weighted votes.
Answer: Impossible to know without the audit.
My favorite next.
Assertion: Election fraud is a fairytale.
Answer: Impossible to know without the audit!
I could go on but I beleive I've made my point. "The audit" is the one thing that could have put this debacle to rest. It didn't happen. I'll
close this post with an assertion of my own.
Assertion: The election is a fraud because nothing was done to insure transparency, propriety and legality.
Answer: Impossible to prove without "The Audit"(TM)