originally posted by: 113399
a reply to: crankyoldman
100% agreed. i followed along much of the time but never posted.. but went into a very busy period... now coming back.. there are "q" people now
watched like q drops... seems very odd and suspect to me.
to me: q is for those that can see the unseen already if that makes sense... it's a guide of something a bit beyond
(Snipped to save characters)
If I may, I just want to put my own particular view on this.
A lot of Q peeps seem to be purists in terms of data points. Only the drops, nothing else. Everything else is disinformation.
I understand this, I know why... No outside comms... don't trust anyone else.
Absolutely nothing wrong with this.
Personally, I am an outsider, and I take a very particular approach to solving problems/mysteries.
To see clearly, you want as many data points as possible. The more data points you have, the clearer the picture. The more datasets you have, the more
you can overlay them on top of each other and work out if there is cohesion. It is a good way to validate what data is in contention and where
seemingly disparate sources align or stray from the initial premise.
What I will say about outside sources, is that I have continued to be surprised by how consistent they are. I fully expected at some point, that they
would be shown to be incorrect and vanish from the picture. What has surprised me, is that these sources have actually been pretty, to very
consistent. Non of them vanished.
Even ones I am very suspicious about are lining up with each other, and would seem to be very separate and not in each others spheres.
This has led me to 2 posibilities.
1. They are actively involved in whatever is happening, and genuinely do have inside knowledge.
2. They are all working together to form a parallel narrative.
And yet, with a few exceptions, they do all seem to connect with each other in various ways. Often foreknowledge and timing.
Those with the greatest aura of "latching on" to me, are people like Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes. But even they have a lot to lose if they are
wrong. But I keep those at arms length. But even Charlie Wards info lines up with some people, and suggests he does know "something". Could be good
guess work, but then, I'm struck by the fact that although he seems like a friendly enough bloke, he doesn't look like a deep researcher, and doesn't
come off that way. He is getting his knowledge from somewhere.
Of all the people who are seen as an outside source, I'd say "E" probably has the most trust and following. He certainly seems to have some
interesting knowledge and understanding... he(or she) certainly seems to project that at least.
If his countdown is correct, (which we shall find out) then what can be said? Has he just worked out the Q drops correctly and is LARPing on the
knowledge? The countdown (10 days of darkness) might be confirmed by some sort of new Q post... information drop etc. (This is what I am
expecting).
What of our visitor ghost? The lightning strike suggested inauguration day would be the strike point. Whoever is behind those posts, and others that
sporadically appear here (and seem to acknowledge one another), seem to be very much on point too... if a little weird. But, to me... I know this all
gets weird. I cannot discount them... are they really doing all this just to mess with our minds?
Of course, another option...
3. All of the outside comms are the true information, and the drops are the red herrings (or vice versa). Confusion of the enemy is probably pretty
vital. To go and show your entire plan is way too risky if the game is still on in some way (and not a pure movie). But they could all be part of the
same plan serving different functions. If I was doing something like this, and as there are no real rules to playing the game... it is exactly what I
would expect.
Expect the unexpected.
But the key feature, is that everyone who has followed all of this remains in a place of uncertainty. But at the same time, they all present the same
targets and have shown over time that without doubt, something is going on. Confirming to people that something is happening is the only real feature
that is important. From a psychological point of view, if one of the key phrases of the information is mass awakening, escaping the programming...
then uncertainty and changing landscapes makes people pay attention. Survival mode activated.
I can see how it all fits together, but the timing is the hardest to determine, and as one of the visitors here has suggested, we aren't really meant
to be predicting the future from this info. It is meant to be a spiritual journey. That means being thrust into darkness to be elevated into a place
of knowing/seeing clearly. Truth. Declassification "should" display a cohesive picture that spans across all of the data. painting a detailed
landscape of information.
And finally, we have Trump himself. Potentially mastermind behind it, or certainly a large part of it. Hard to say right now.
But his actions and connections have shown a series of events unfolding, leading to declassification. The chess game. Letting people fall into traps
and expose themselves.
And now... we have 20,000+ troops in DC and it has been turned into a prison... and nearly all of the sources I have paid attention to over the last
year seem unsurprised by this and are telling people to stay calm.
When it is all uncovered, I expect to be surprised by who is who and what/how it was done. But even the red herrings are doing their job. My only real
question, is... is there a CIA version of Q that is emulating it and trying to cause problems?
I always keep that in mind when looking outside the source info. But I cannot ignore it. Maintaining multiple realities is vital when in a place of
unknowing. Breadcrumbs (data) add up. As time goes on, and more is added, certain realities fall away. Eventually you end up with a focus.
So much of it all is out of our hands. Everyone here a detective looking through their personal lens and perspective. Fitting the pieces into their
own model of reality from their vantage point. the more data and viewpoints you have, the clearer the view becomes. Personal beliefs can colour
information too... which is why getting to know one another, and the way each person sees things is important (without judgement). Veterans...
Biblical folk... traditional (long time) conspiracy theorists... the curious/impartial... the detractors... the mathematical... many different types.
Our realities are all different shapes, and data comes in and we see whether it fits in our shape hole. If you are rigid in how you see things... then
you reject a lot of information to fit with your world view. If you are flexible... then you let the information define your shape, and continue to
change as new information is added. Being flexible is the only way to really find truth. Remember the Bruce Lee clip? Be water. The shape of reality
is not you... you are at the centre of that shape looking outwards.
A genuine spirit, just wants to know truth, what ever it might look like. Ugly or beautiful. The closer to truth you get, the clearer you see. And
deep down, the most important truths are very very simple. They're just buried under a whole heap of pointless cr*p.
Discernment doesn't mean ignoring data. It means to understand it