The proof isn’t in the pudding?

It’s in everything; if you have an open mind, some basic math skills and an ability to “read between the lines” of MSM..

But all I find when conversing with anyone who denies their was fraud in this election:

A.) almost non existent math skills
B.) poor and below average reading comprehension
C.) the wit, charisma and temper of 13 year olds.

Along with a lot of other very “telling” traits; I have come to the conclusion, that I’m arguing with grade schoolers..... it has to be, because grown adults, surely do not act in a manner they do for 4 years..... then just simply dismiss it and switch to the offense..... that is what CHILDREN do.

Hope you all have a Happy New Year!

P.s. For those who voted for Biden.... you though lines at Chinese restaurants on New Years were long now? JUST WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR 😆

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

I'm no spelling/grammar Nazi, but since that is your topic here goes.

But all I find when conversing with anyone who denies their was fraud in this election:

THERE, not their.
There was fraud.

P.s. For those who voted for Biden.... you though lines at Chinese restaurants on

THOUGHT

B.) poor and below average reading comprehension

Please add yourself to that list.

The more I see right wingers dig this election fraud issue the more my admiration grows for Bernie Sanders. I didn’t vote for Bernie because on of the more pragmatic place from the left but is there was one person that for real had any legitimate complaint about how he lost not one but TWO primaries is him.

He had a decision to make... do I go burn it all down? Or should I encourage my voters to vote for the Democratic candidate? Bernie Sanders could have inflict so much damage to the Dems and he didn’t do it and it shows what the main difference in the two parties is.

originally posted by: Bunch
The more I see right wingers dig this election fraud issue the more my admiration grows for Bernie Sanders. I didn’t vote for Bernie because on of the more pragmatic place from the left but is there was one person that for real had any legitimate complaint about how he lost not one but TWO primaries is him.

He had a decision to make... do I go burn it all down? Or should I encourage my voters to vote for the Democratic candidate? Bernie Sanders could have inflict so much damage to the Dems and he didn’t do it and it shows what the main difference in the two parties is.

Bernie Sanders was bought by the DNC .
Twice.

originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

I'm no spelling/grammar Nazi, but since that is your topic here goes.

But all I find when conversing with anyone who denies their was fraud in this election:

THERE, not their.
There was fraud.

P.s. For those who voted for Biden.... you though lines at Chinese restaurants on

THOUGHT

B.) poor and below average reading comprehension

Please add yourself to that list.

So , you are admitting to fully fitting in with the concept of the original OP ?

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Okay this might be too easy, low hanging fruit but am gonna bite because I feel like you rushed to make this after reading my most recent thread.

You state in your OP that:

But all I find when conversing with anyone who denies their was fraud in this election:

A.) almost non existent math skills

Ok in the thread I wrote recently you said it was mathematically impossible for so many people to cast votes, when asked for a mathematical proof provided none. So if you want to talk about not existent maths skills, let's talk.

B.) poor and below average reading comprehension

Right if you're going to be passing off judgement on the literacy skills of other others please first learn the appropriate use of "there" and "their" because your second line literally includes quite a simple grammatical error. Now I am by no means a stickler for such things but...come on! you can't say that then leave this error just sitting there in the second line of your op.

C.) the wit, charisma and temper of 13 year olds.

And then you say this...

P.s. For those who voted for Biden.... you though lines at Chinese restaurants on New Years were long now? JUST WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR

Pretty sure that should be "Your through lines" but you can't talk about people have the wit, charisma and temper of teenagers then write something childish like this.

So ironically in this one thread you have fell fowl of all three of these things yourself.

a reply to: Gothmog

So , you are admitting to fully fitting in with the concept of the original OP ?

To clarify.
Do I think that this and all elections have fraud? YES.
Did this one have enough fraud to change the outcome? NO.

If an entire OP is based on people lacking rudimentary educational skills to form an opinion, I might suggest
that the OP reflect on his own educational level.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Alright, show us the maths.

Because all I've seen so far is people who were conditioned for months before the election took place to believe there'd be fraud.
Which is utterly amazing, the Donnie is the #ing president why didn't he prevent it?
And he and his very powerful entourage of bootlickers couldn't find anything that could be regarded as evidence just anecdotes from people who couldn't even identify their car if it was the only one in the parking lot.

So let's talk maths. Show us whatcha got.

a reply to: JAGStorm

Okay so you correct grammar, but ignore the OP.

Next contestant?

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: JAGStorm

Okay so you correct grammar, but ignore the OP.

Next contestant?

Quite literally 1/3rd of your OP is ranting about the literacy skills of others so its fair and totally on topic to point out thats yours is far from perfect.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Where's the maths?

There's pudding...yummy. I guess that's more than the evidence brought forward by Trump and his lawyers

to judges appointed by his administration all the way to the highest court.

You would at least figure they would see the case if this evidence you say is out there is there,

no one has seems to have brought forth real trial worthy HARD EVIDENCE.


Damn it now I want pudding.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

I’m not going to correct those “mistakes” until the purpose of this OP is completed.

Which type of proof would you like?

Physical?
Mathematical?
Statistics?
Affidavits?
Video?

Ask and you shall receive; now the funny thing is, this post will NOT be edited. Because *Their* brains, (yours included) miss the connections right in front of *them/you* It’s right *there*....

As I recall, the last post I left in your OP was: “Troll feeder”, then I posted this with clear mistakes (edited in unlike this one) to point out, evidence is often as ignored as the breadcrumbs they are.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Mathematical.
Show it

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
It’s in everything; if you have an open mind, some basic math skills and an ability to “read between the lines” of MSM..

But all I find when conversing with anyone who denies their was fraud in this election:

A.) almost non existent math skills

Funny you should say that.

I've asked over and over and over and over and over for the statistical proof that there was fraud.

I got YouTube videos.

I got lots of adjectives.

I got statistical terms used out of context.

But I still haven't seen the statistical proof.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

No I think what's actually happened here is that you got a little bit triggered by my thread, hence the "troll feeder" post and came along here to have a wee rant thats ended up with you getting egg on your face.

You can dress it up anyway you want but you wrote this claiming that those who deny voter fraud suffer from poor literacy and numeracy skills and have the wit, charisma and temper of a 13 year old....I think this thread so far has shown that you above all seem to be most afflicted from these three qualities.

My advice to you would be that next time you want to take an indirect dig at me you just head off to Reddit and be more explicit.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

To paraphrase Augustus “I’m far more intelligent, than I pretend to be”.....

This post was intentionally meant to serve as the “chamber” for all the echoes.

You ask for *proof* it’s already been given 100s of times over; yet you keep asking the question, but ignore the answer.

This is my way of making *a list* as Kamala put it; outlining who is worth engaging with, other than that it’s for fun.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

No...

Sorry this thread was you chucking your toys out of the pram and its backfired.

Thanks for the entertainment.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

It was my pleasure.

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
To paraphrase Augustus “I’m far more intelligent, than I pretend to be”.....

Except in my case it's true.