It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Citing 'censorship' concerns, North Idaho internet provider blocks Facebook, Twitter
A North Idaho internet provider, Your T1 WIFI, confirmed it is blocking Facebook and Twitter from its WIFI service for some customers due to censorship claims.
Your T1 WIFI provides internet services to North Idaho and the Spokane area.
The move comes after Twitter and Facebook banned President Trump from their platforms due to incitement of violence and undermining the transition of power to President elect Joe Biden.
"It has come to our attention that Twitter and Facebook are engaged in censorship of our customers and information," an email to customers reads.
The service provider said the change would go into effect on Wednesday, Jan. 13.
originally posted by: loam
Citing 'censorship' concerns, North Idaho internet provider blocks Facebook, Twitter
A North Idaho internet provider, Your T1 WIFI, confirmed it is blocking Facebook and Twitter from its WIFI service for some customers due to censorship claims.
Your T1 WIFI provides internet services to North Idaho and the Spokane area.
The move comes after Twitter and Facebook banned President Trump from their platforms due to incitement of violence and undermining the transition of power to President elect Joe Biden.
The article continues:
"It has come to our attention that Twitter and Facebook are engaged in censorship of our customers and information," an email to customers reads.
The service provider said the change would go into effect on Wednesday, Jan. 13.
The crazy is only just getting started.
originally posted by: carsforkids
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: loam
While I appreciate the irony, you don't fight censorship with more censorship.
Yeah but isn't this the way to send Twitter and Facebook to LOL trash bin?
Say if more follow. Because people are to addicted to abstain when they should?
IDK
In an email posted to Twitter by a customer, Krista Yep, the company says it was fielding calls from customers asking that the service not display the sites on the internet, and that they didn't want their children to be able to access them.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: loam
From the article in your post.
In an email posted to Twitter by a customer, Krista Yep, the company says it was fielding calls from customers asking that the service not display the sites on the internet, and that they didn't want their children to be able to access them.
I think this is a step in the right direction, though I am not sure if I support their reasoning.
Less internet and social media in most people's lives, and especially in the lives of our children, is not a bad thing.