It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NEVER Before Seen Video INSIDE The BENT Pyramid of Egypt

page: 2
36
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 7 2021 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: SecretKnowledge

this was really cool. thank you for sharing it.
what is your take on the purpose?


Probably started as a tomb, perhaps even a dual tomb, but never finished and abandoned for 'x' reason.



posted on Jan, 7 2021 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Hanslune

My 'idiotic' reason is as a soul device to have easy non time consuming access to OOBE experiences and astral travel



posted on Jan, 7 2021 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: eManym
The blocks had to have been made from some kind of concrete mixture made from finely crushed limestone mixed with water and poured in place with seams added for aesthetics. Blocks poured individually and slid into place could be a possibility.

No one really knows what the bent pyramid was constructed for. A structure built to worship the gods of the time?

It appears that the interior design is for the enhancement acoustics. Priest were provided with an entrance to put on a show to make the structures appear supernatural because worship of the gods would be a mechanism for controlling the populous.



They melted the stone down using glass and the sun.



posted on Jan, 7 2021 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Hanslune

Your question:
Could you explain why we never find any evidence of the infrastructure and development of technology to support development of such 'precision cutting tools' ? Additionally, if the AE had such advanced technology why did they use it only for cutting stones?

My Answer:
Maybe its because no record of precision cutting tools have been found to date. I don't know what technology the AE had. I suggested that the blocks may have been poured from a mixture of crushed limestone and water.

I suggested the there was no way to get that kind of precision without large precision cutting tools. Implying IF they were cut and not poured.

The Romans invented concrete in our current knowledge of history. They created a concrete mix that would set under water. So with that, doesn't it seem plausible that many of there structures were built using concrete and molds. Is there no record about how the Romans worked stone?

Although off topic, the huge base blocks at Baallbek are proposed to have already been in place when the Romans built the temple there.


edit on 7-1-2021 by eManym because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 7 2021 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: rounda

The problem with melting stone, specifically granite, is it vitrifies or transforms turns into obsidian. Obsidian is very brittle and not a good material for building.



posted on Jan, 7 2021 @ 04:15 PM
link   
The Bent pyramid was started about 50 years before the Great pyramid 12 miles to its north.
The 11 degree slope change may have been by design and left as a puzzle for eternity.
The Great pyramid may have been a refinement of the theme.

Lots of ready made cut and paste explanations available but what was really the intended message?

Edit to add: The Babylonians divided the astronomical circle into 360 degrees in the 2nd millennium BC so the 54/43 degree slopes were probably based on a 360 degree circle. Was there a picture of a three stranded rope in one of those video links?

edit on 7-1-2021 by Slichter because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2021 @ 04:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: SecretKnowledge

this was really cool. thank you for sharing it.
what is your take on the purpose?


I dont have an opinion on it at the moment, but i dont believe they were tombs. Reason being that why would they mark the place of burial with a pyramid knowing its a marker for thieves?

If you look at drawings of the pyramids with all the stairwells and chambers etc. they look like, like, well thats were i get stuck. They just look like something way too big. Like the chambers were for something that generates power of some sort.
I really cant get my head around pyramids.

Jimmy in this video and another he has posted since he returned from Egypt (its 3 hours long so im not posting it) has said that many locals in Giza do not believe they were tombs. He says a minority do believe they were but a majority do not. And he went asking believe me.



posted on Jan, 9 2021 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: SecretKnowledge

There have been other large national projects like the Great wall in China, and on a smaller scale even projects like the Apollo space program in the US. Tutankhamun took the throne at eight or nine years of age so he obviously was a reflection of his handlers agenda. Who were JFK's military handlers within the CIA?


edit on 9-1-2021 by Slichter because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2021 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Slichter

Say what in the where now?

You need to explain your thinking a whole lot clearer. What are you on about?
What has your post got to do with this thread?

Why are you posing this question to me?


Who were JFK's military handlers within the CIA?



posted on Jan, 9 2021 @ 06:31 PM
link   
a reply to: SecretKnowledge

Who designed the pyramids?
There were obviously elite engineers, but also maybe some elite social strategists that understood how a high visibility project might attract intellectual and monetary resources to their empire.

The US CIA had a similar mission after WW2 and some of the funding for projects like the Kennedy brand moon missions probably went to space infrastructure like weather and communication satellites instead.

If you are a "Q-anon" devoted to Truth and integrity, covert agency protocol can be a problem, especially for targeted young children that have been kidnapped from truther homes.

My apologies



posted on Jan, 10 2021 @ 01:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Slichter

Get outta here with your American politics rubbish



posted on Jan, 10 2021 @ 06:11 AM
link   
a reply to: SecretKnowledge

I agree the pyramids were global scale and most of recorded history could not assimilate them much less your video.
Too bad we are all so captivated by some cheap Insurrection Media, production to care.

edit on 10-1-2021 by Slichter because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2021 @ 08:45 AM
link   
I don't see how people back then could cut large stone with that kind of precision and be able to place them to where over millenniums you can't fit a playing card between the "stone" blocks. I agree with other people, they had to use some type of mixture and pour it into a form.

With all the technology we have today, we would have trouble building a structure half that size, let alone have it last millenniums without showing large gaps in between the over 3 ton blocks of stone.



posted on Jan, 10 2021 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Inside is very complicated, definitely
a machine. No mortar used.

These experts should shut up and
do thinking about real things about
the structure besides it was a burial
chamber.

How did they do it? Obviously with technology
lost to us. Cone heads would have IQs of
around 300 and could have made that tech.

Also there is evidence the Tiwanaku
cone heads visited all over the world. Lay lines
connect a lot of ancient places like Egypt
and lake Titicauca.

a reply to: Echo007


edit on 10-1-2021 by ThatDidHappen because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2021 @ 01:31 AM
link   
One queen, nefretiti was one. Busts reveal
a large head, maybe 3 times the normal person sized
brain. Average IQ 90 - 110. So conehead IQ
300. If it is a linear function. Maybe it's 2 times
as big but IQ 400 or more.

a reply to: ThatDidHappen



posted on Jan, 11 2021 @ 01:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThatDidHappen
One queen, nefretiti was one. Busts reveal
a large head, maybe 3 times the normal person sized
brain. Average IQ 90 - 110. So conehead IQ
300. If it is a linear function. Maybe it's 2 times
as big but IQ 400 or more.

a reply to: ThatDidHappen

files.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 11-1-2021 by ThatDidHappen because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2021 @ 01:10 PM
link   
Maybe this is just me peering over that yawning chasm that is the journey down the mountain of middle age.....but this guy talking about leg day while walking through the pyramid about ruined the experience.

I mean amazing that he gets this chance to waltz through the pyramid...and LEG DAY BRAH.

Thats going to haunt me in my nightmares. Like here comes Lew and Clark ....DID YOU EVEN LEG DAY BRAH?

The crusaders unloading all the treasure onto Oak Island---Hey did you LEG DAY BRAH?



posted on Jan, 11 2021 @ 02:49 PM
link   
Cool, his videos are always good!



posted on Jan, 11 2021 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: ThatDidHappen
Inside is very complicated, definitely
a machine. No mortar used.


Are you trying to say that machinery was used to construct the pyramid or that the pyramid itself is a machine? Mortar wasn't necessary and if it were used, then all of the pyramids would be in far worse shape than they currently are. Mortar and concretions require maintenance whereas granite requires none and resists erosion and damage from the elements with zero maintenance.



These experts should shut up and
do thinking about real things about
the structure besides it was a burial
chamber.


They do. Perhaps it is you who should reexamine your approach?



How did they do it? Obviously with technology
lost to us.


Oh yay... Another logical fallacy! This is what we call an Appeal to Ignorance. How exactly is it "obvious" that the construction was done woth technology that jas been lost to us? In fact, its quite the oppositw of what you insist upon. There is a mountain of evidence showing us quite clearly that in ancient Egypt, the pyramids were built by skilled craftsmen and an army of laborers.


Cone heads would have IQs of
around 300 and could have made that tech.


How exactly were you able to estimate the IQ's of these people? And where in the timeline of ancient Egypt did these magical people exist? What evidence do you have to support this hypothetical scenario? You have shown nothing to support this aside from your personal incredulity towards trained Egyptologists and archaeologists.


Also there is evidence the Tiwanaku
cone heads visited all over the world.


No. There isn't. Please feel free to falsify my position with actual facts beyond conjecture and hyperbole.



Lay lines connect a lot of ancient places like Egypt and lake Titicauca.


I can draw lines on a globe and create make believe connections too. It doesnt make them real though.

And to touch on your subsequent posts, the famous bust of Nefertiti shows her wearing a crown. The large crown doesn't make her a "cone head" no matter how you try to paint that picture. Remains believed to be Nefertiti, show a completely normal sized cranium. Nothing elongated or remotely cone shaped.

Perhaps you could utilize the scientific method and demonstrate to us how you arrived at your estimates for such immense IQ's and explain why their genes didn't proliferate through the local population. One would think that such an advantageous mutation would still be present but there is no evidence to support this hypothetical scenario.



posted on Jan, 12 2021 @ 08:44 AM
link   
a reply to: peter vlar

Probably was 145.45454545 at the time of the bent pyramid.
Only 136 when cool hand Luke was pulled over in the shiny new buggy he stole.
Anyone trying to make money on it these days is probably headed for chapter 11.



new topics

    top topics



     
    36
    << 1    3 >>

    log in

    join