GA’s SoS Raffensperger Gave Hackers Roadmap To Infiltrate Machines A Year Before Election

a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm further along than your expert level you feel you own.

With your excellent knowledge you are denying that they hacked the machines in real time live?

Those entry level courses, eh?

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
I think I would be more worried by the fact that hackers actually had a voting machine to work on at DEF CON in 2019. Of course the only way to "hack" it involved opening it up.

But I'm sure that happened at numerous polling places and nobody noticed.

Lol, or that one was found in a ditch!

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm further along than your expert level you feel you own.

I didn't claim that and you know it.

So, from your viewpoint, is the spreadsheet available to the public on the Secretary of States' website a treasure map for hackers? Can you hack the election system in Georgia or anyone else on that basis?

Oh, you stealth edited?

No, I don't need entry level computing courses to know a grift when I see one. Are you still on about that? LOL.

a reply to: HalWesten


But that’s not the premise of the thread is it?

Your kind of changing the goal post there.

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa

originally posted by: LookingAtMars

originally posted by: Gryphon66
The really hilarious thing here, if you look at it from the right angle, is that the Dominion Machines were bought in Georgia in the spring after the 2018 debacle with alleged vote switching on the ES&S machines that had no paper trail whatsoever.

I think this election has opened some peoples eyes to the fact that, the only reason to use a machine to count votes is so you can cheat better.

But they did a hand recount in Georgia and the original results were shown to be correct.

Recounting all the votes including the fraudulent ones would give the same results. No big secret there.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: HalWesten

What would it take to hack the Dominion system based on what you know?

Wouldn't the hack leave "footprints" throughout the systems?

I don't know enough about their systems & networks to tell you. I can only tell you what I know to be true based on my past experience. Aside from that I would have to freshen my skills, it's been a while since I was doing that. I can tell you that none of my network were ever hacked and there were frequent attempts. A few of the wannabe hacker students tried but always failed, except for the one time a student watched a teacher type in their password. He caused some interesting but benign issues from that. The rest were probably being done by script-kiddies overseas but they showed up on my logs nonetheless.

Hacks don't always leave footprints, it depends on how the equipment was set up. I was paranoid about my networks so I had all sorts of logging and tracking turned on. Whether the Dominion systems were done the same I can't say.

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: HalWesten


But that’s not the premise of the thread is it?

Your kind of changing the goal post there.

Who's moving the goal posts? I responded to your post. Nice try at deflection.

a reply to: Gryphon66

No, you offer your opinion, nothing more.

a reply to: HalWesten

Thank you for the detailed response. My partner is a systems analyst so I recognize some of the terminology LOL.

I find that claims like this one in the OP diminish the overall quality of discussion and do little more than obfuscate for those that are in the business of deception.

Thanks again for taking the time.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: Gryphon66

No, you offer your opinion, nothing more.

Proven untrue in this very thread.

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: HalWesten


But that’s not the premise of the thread is it?

Your kind of changing the goal post there.

Who's moving the goal posts? I responded to your post. Nice try at deflection.

The op is claiming the votes were manipulated by the machines, then you “deflected” when I brought up there was a hand recount by saying the votes were fraudulent in the first place.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: Gryphon66

No, you offer your opinion, nothing more.

Proven untrue in this very thread.

Cool, let us know when you get some actual programming knowledge, until then stop pretending you know #.

You oughta be embarrassed but you on your little crusade eh.

a reply to: HalWesten

I don't know enough about their systems & networks to tell you.

So, GA's SoS did not give hackers a roadmap to infiltrate voting machines a year before the election.

Thank you for using your expertise to disprove the OP.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

weak.

I linked to the source of the spreadsheet the OP's article references at the SoS website.

I've not claimed to be a hacker or computer specialist.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: HalWesten

I don't know enough about their systems & networks to tell you.

So, GA's SoS did not give hackers a roadmap to infiltrate voting machines a year before the election.

Thank you for using your expertise to disprove the OP.

If you were paying attention, I said it takes more than the OP provided but it's easily gained by people who know how to do things like that. I didn't disprove anything, I gave my educated opinion.