It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: caterpillage
Is it wrong when a dog eats an ill or “presumed ill/ messed up” pup? That might effect the rest of the litter? OR is nature not one sided?
I refuse to argue, religion against science...... one has numerous factual based standings
First, the body of scientific knowledge is continually evolving. Scientists don't simply add more facts to our scientific repository; they question new evidence as it comes in, and they repeatedly reexamine prior conclusions. That means that the body of scientific knowledge isn't just growing, it's also changing.
the other was fairy tales written by random dudes.....
The Old and New Testaments pass the bibliographic, internal, and external tests like no other ancient books. Most professional archaeologists and historians acknowledge the historicity of the Bible, and yet many theologians still embrace pre-archaeological critical theories about the Bible. The evidence strongly supports the accuracy of the Bible in relation to history and culture, but in many cases it has been overlooked or rejected because of philosophical presuppositions that run contrary to the Scriptures. This leads to a double standard: critics approach secular literature with one standard but wrongly use a different standard when they examine the Bible. Those who discard the Bible as historically untrustworthy must realize that the same standard would force them to eliminate almost all ancient literature.
Comparison of Existing Manuscript Quantities
Homer: ~2,000
Plato: 7
Aristotle: 49
Caesar: 10
Tacitus: 20
New Testament: 6,000+ in Greek (24,000 including translations in other languages)
hunting animals for *sport*
first trimester-33 weeks in abortion
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
My wife had our daughter and they told her the same thing, it might be defective. I said were having it, and she was perfect, no defects. 13 years old now and beautiful. Not sure why they were trying to talk us in to aborting. Something is really wrong with that.
originally posted by: fencesitter85
Nonsense thread is nonsense.
It's none of your damn business what a woman chooses to do with her body.
Don't bother replying - I've heard it all before and you're still wrong.