It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I just pointed out that the man doesn't have the credentials he claimed.
Of course, that doesn't matter to folks who want to believe.
originally posted by: rounda
a reply to: Klassified
I think heâs full of #. No matter how much I want the voter fraud exposed, people like this destroy credible claims of fraud.
Last night The Curse of Oak Island delivered its verdict on the allegedly âRomanâ sword that erstwhile Treasure Force Commander and current History Heretic J. Hutton Pulitzer has been promoting as a â100% confirmedâ Roman artifact that would rewrite Nova Scotia history. The Lagina brothers, stars of the show, had the sword examined at St. Maryâs University in Nova Scotia, where both an expert in Classics and a chemist specializing in metals declared that the sword is almost certainly modern. A chemical analysis of the sword found that it was made of brass with a zinc content of about 35%, characteristic of brass made in the 1890s or later. Older brass has a lower zinc content.
He revealed his own motives for promoting the Roman sword when he claimed to have exclusive information about interpersonal disagreements among the cast of Curse of Oak Island, which he reported beneath a vaguely homoerotic image of the all-male cast of the show fondling the sword, captioned âAre you ready for sword play?â Sadly, since âSword Playâ was the name of the episode, I donât think Pulitzer actually realized how his graphic appeared.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I just pointed out that the man doesn't have the credentials he claimed.
Of course, that doesn't matter to folks who want to believe.
It doesn't matter because everyone saw what democrats did on election night. Stopping the count and kicking out all GOP. Not allowing any monitoring by GOP, etc. That is the only evidence required.
You lose even if you believe you won. That won't ever change.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I just pointed out that the man doesn't have the credentials he claimed.
Of course, that doesn't matter to folks who want to believe.
It doesn't matter because everyone saw what democrats did on election night. Stopping the count and kicking out all GOP. Not allowing any monitoring by GOP, etc. That is the only evidence required.
You lose even if you believe you won. That won't ever change.
No, "everyone" didn't see what you saw. That should be your first clue that the argument is flawed: appeal to the crowd.
The count was not stopped, the "GOP" wasn't kicked out, Rudy showed you 3 minutes of a 14 hour long video.
There's not any evidence required. And there's certainly none here. Mr. Trump programmed you guys for months to question the election, believe despite all evidence that there was "massive voter fraud" etc.
It makes me sad for many folks, at the end of the day.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I just pointed out that the man doesn't have the credentials he claimed.
Of course, that doesn't matter to folks who want to believe.
It doesn't matter because everyone saw what democrats did on election night. Stopping the count and kicking out all GOP. Not allowing any monitoring by GOP, etc. That is the only evidence required.
You lose even if you believe you won. That won't ever change.
No, "everyone" didn't see what you saw. That should be your first clue that the argument is flawed: appeal to the crowd.
The count was not stopped, the "GOP" wasn't kicked out, Rudy showed you 3 minutes of a 14 hour long video.
There's not any evidence required. And there's certainly none here. Mr. Trump programmed you guys for months to question the election, believe despite all evidence that there was "massive voter fraud" etc.
It makes me sad for many folks, at the end of the day.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I just pointed out that the man doesn't have the credentials he claimed.
Of course, that doesn't matter to folks who want to believe.
It doesn't matter because everyone saw what democrats did on election night. Stopping the count and kicking out all GOP. Not allowing any monitoring by GOP, etc. That is the only evidence required.
You lose even if you believe you won. That won't ever change.
No, "everyone" didn't see what you saw. That should be your first clue that the argument is flawed: appeal to the crowd.
The count was not stopped, the "GOP" wasn't kicked out, Rudy showed you 3 minutes of a 14 hour long video.
There's not any evidence required. And there's certainly none here. Mr. Trump programmed you guys for months to question the election, believe despite all evidence that there was "massive voter fraud" etc.
It makes me sad for many folks, at the end of the day.
Lying about it changes nothing. Go on, keep on lying. It's your own spiritual funeral.
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I just pointed out that the man doesn't have the credentials he claimed.
Of course, that doesn't matter to folks who want to believe.
It doesn't matter because everyone saw what democrats did on election night. Stopping the count and kicking out all GOP. Not allowing any monitoring by GOP, etc. That is the only evidence required.
You lose even if you believe you won. That won't ever change.
No, "everyone" didn't see what you saw. That should be your first clue that the argument is flawed: appeal to the crowd.
The count was not stopped, the "GOP" wasn't kicked out, Rudy showed you 3 minutes of a 14 hour long video.
There's not any evidence required. And there's certainly none here. Mr. Trump programmed you guys for months to question the election, believe despite all evidence that there was "massive voter fraud" etc.
It makes me sad for many folks, at the end of the day.
Yes, âeveryoneâ did see that.
EVERY news station reported the count would be stopped until morning.
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Gryphon66
The dude lied.
I believe the story was someone was fishing off Oak Island and pulled the sword up in his net. The sword was given to Pulitzer and he claimed it was a 100% verified Roman artifact....turned out to be a replica made in the early 1900's.
People saw the sword on TV and started posting pictures of exactly the same sword.
If any one would take the time to watch a couple of the COOI episodes he was in, he comes across as a con man.
A simple search for J. Hutton Pulitzer and The Curse of Oak Island. It's not that difficult.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I just pointed out that the man doesn't have the credentials he claimed.
Of course, that doesn't matter to folks who want to believe.
It doesn't matter because everyone saw what democrats did on election night. Stopping the count and kicking out all GOP. Not allowing any monitoring by GOP, etc. That is the only evidence required.
You lose even if you believe you won. That won't ever change.
No, "everyone" didn't see what you saw. That should be your first clue that the argument is flawed: appeal to the crowd.
The count was not stopped, the "GOP" wasn't kicked out, Rudy showed you 3 minutes of a 14 hour long video.
There's not any evidence required. And there's certainly none here. Mr. Trump programmed you guys for months to question the election, believe despite all evidence that there was "massive voter fraud" etc.
It makes me sad for many folks, at the end of the day.
Yes, âeveryoneâ did see that.
EVERY news station reported the count would be stopped until morning.
Okay ... then you should be able to show us that, right?
If everyone saw it, and every news station carried it ... show us.
Later in the night, Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections, told ABC News that the election department sent the State Farm Arena absentee ballot counters home at 10:30 p.m. despite earlier intentions to complete processing Tuesday night. Some additional numbers could still come out Tuesday night, but as of now the staff will be back at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday.
Fulton County officials said repairs were made within two hours and that no ballots or equipment were impacted.
As for the timing of counting ballots, county officials said, "there was a brief delay in tabulating absentee ballots while the repairs were being conducted."
"Tonight Fulton County will report results for approximately 86,000 absentee ballots, as well as Election Day and Early Voting results," county officials said.
"As planned, Fulton County will continue to tabulate the remainder of absentee ballots over the next two days," the officials continued. "Fulton County did not anticipate having all absentee ballots processed on Election Day."
Fulton County Election Chief Richard Barron said Friday during a special board meeting there never was an announcement for everyone to leave the arena.
"Certain staff that [was] on the cutting stations, that [was] on the flattening stations, that [was] extracting from the inner envelopes, those staff left as work completed," Barron said. "I found out sometime. I think a little after 10:30, that they were going to cease operations. I told them not to do that."