The girl who took the shot and fainted died 10 hours later maybe

All i can come up with if she's stilll alive is that she has changed her opinion on the vax and is being told to keep quiet.

Really? That’s all you can come up with?

I know it sounds insane, but maybe she’s alive and well, and doesn’t feel the need to prove otherwise to a handful of strangers online? She had a jab, is doing fine, and is getting on with her life. Or is that too unbelievable?

People so badly want this evil vaccine business to be true that they'll fabricate pretty insane stories to fit their narrative.

I know I know, before you say it; I’m a sheep, I’m a puppet, I’ve been brainwashed etc.

a reply to: EternalShadow

Yes, you are stupid as snip.

Anyone else passed out after getting the injection?
Exactly how does a vaccination make someone pass out anyway?

A couple of pretty obvious questions that you lot seem to not want to ask.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: EternalShadow

You are stupid as snip.

Anyone else passed out after getting the injection?
Exactly how does a vaccination make someone pass out anyway?

A couple of pretty obvious questions that you lot seem to not want to ask.

You've never been in the military , have you ?

a reply to: Gothmog

How about answering my question instead of trying to be smart.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Gothmog

How about answering my question instead of trying to be smart.

Thanks , you answered my question.
And I had already answered yours.

a reply to: Gothmog

Uh..ok.

Hey why’d you scurry off from that other thread? The COVID deaths one? Work out you were wrong?

Seems that’s happening quite a bit huh?

Why don’t you actually use your words and explain yourself instead of asking leading questions huh?

I know it’s the kewl thing to do and you’ll get lots of stars but you’re just coming off as a complete wanker right now.

a reply to: Boadicea

She made it everyone's business when she got the jab on tv. She took to the propaganda arm to show the shot was safe for the public, which is why anyone even knows of her.

You'd have to believe both she and those putting on the event are imbeciles to use someone who faints so easily, when that was the opposite of the objective.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: EternalShadow

Yes, you are stupid as snip.

Anyone else passed out after getting the injection?
Exactly how does a vaccination make someone pass out anyway?

A couple of pretty obvious questions that you lot seem to not want to ask.

Um, no I'm not.

This isn't the Mud-Pit so watch the T's & C's!


Apparently, a trial volunteer fainted and passed out after receiving the vaccine due to a related high fever.

The vaccine developed by the Vaccine Research Centre of the USA and Modern company has already started human trials with their vaccine candidate; unfortunately, a 29-year-old volunteer named Ian Haydon suffered a severe reaction to the dose. According to the STAT medical journey, 12 hours after being administered a dose, he developed a high fever of over 39.5º C. His fever was so high that he was admitted to accidents and emergencies where he fainted and passed out.

en.as.com...

During basic training, we had three recruits hit the deck and required attention shortly after being jabbed. I don't recall why, but they apparently had a reaction.

It happens.

a reply to: EternalShadow

So one other fainted 12 hours later...not 17 minutes later..from an allergic reaction.

So a completely different vaccine in the military means the same thing as a COVID vaccination?

Really? That’s dumber than using a nurse that passes out from pain.

Yes it was stupid to use her to show off the vaccine but the fact is, the COVID vaccine she got didn’t make her pass out, she could have gotten ANY vaccine and she could have passed out. She has even said a hangnail could be enough to make it happen.

That’s entirely my point if I wasn’t clear enough.

The COVID vaccine didn’t make her pass out.

And it didn’t kill her.

I’d be more upset at those people trying to push that agenda than at me...but hey, birds of a feather blah blah blah

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: EternalShadow

So one other fainted 12 hours later...not 17 minutes later..from an allergic reaction.

So a completely different vaccine in the military means the same thing as a COVID vaccination?

Really? That’s dumber than using a nurse that passes out from pain.

I'm sure there's more than just another one, but it took me literally 2 minutes to find that one since you asked, there you go.🤷🏾‍♂️

A reaction is a reaction. You are aware of different metabolism rates that exist between people, yes?

I know it's a different vaccine because the Covid vaccine didn't exist 20+ years ago. I'm just saying reactions do happen.

ETA: Well the Covid vaccine made that guy pass out, no? 🤷🏾‍♂️

a reply to: Hecate666

Not to mention, it claims she has an Instagram.
So that tells me she enjoys attention.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: CthulhuMythos

Only knowing the end result is in the public's best interests. Not the individual, much less any identifying information. And even knowing the end result is limited in its practical application, because whatever specific factor or condition allowed for this to happen does not apply to everyone (or anyone) else. If it was a diabetic complication, it would only to apply to those with the same condition. If it was a cardio issue, it would only apply to those with the same condition. All the information needed is exclusive of the individual's identity.

I agree, knowing the outcome is in the public's best interest, be it a positive or negative outcome, especially where there is doubt in the first place.

I agree also that complictions or negative results may arise due to an underlying condition. This, however, is still in the public's interest to know because it is invaluable to all those with the same underlying condition/conditions. It is just like health and safety laws saying manufacturers must put 'may contain nuts' on produce as a warning that their product is not safe for those with nut allergies (especially where it could be fatal). Full information regarding the safety of any product should be made clear and available to everyone in order for them to make their own risk assessment before taking/using that product.

I also agree that all the information is exclusive of the person's identity, we do not need to know her name, if she is married, has kids, where she lives, her phone number etc. We only really need to know basic factors that come into play with a possible reaction (or indeed success) of using a product, e.g. sex/age/pre-product health conditions etc.

However, neither her nor the media chose to keep her identity private. Considering the total distrust over this particular product, which has prompted individuals who believe it to be safe, to go public to promote it's use as she has done, if it was a rip roaring success, there would have been a media fan fare. The fact that not only has this not happened but there looks like there has been a silencing on the results only adds to the suspicion that the product is not safe. It is in the interest of all involved to be honest with all results, espeically in a climate where we are being told 'everyone will have to have the shot' by the authorities who have already lost public confidence.

The only purpose in violating this woman's privacy is for personal reasons... in your case, it seems that you want her shamed for promoting the vaccination as safe.

Wondering how you came to the conclusion I want her shamed for promoting a vaccine as safe. I don't want anyone shamed. I think she is a very brave woman to basically trial a new product, as are all the others that took part in trials off camera (and very sad that some have died because they did).
If the vaccine is a success, I want to hear about it, if it is not safe and she is harmed, I also want to hear about it, and that IS in the public interest.

the government sees vaccinations much differently. If the product was not properly tested, that's not on this nurse. That's on the FDA and Big Pharma. But the FDA and Big Pharma both KNOW and EXPECT that some people will react negatively to the vaccine. They KNOW and EXPECT that at least a few will even die. And they are okay with that. In fact, they are soooooo okay with that they gave legal liability immunity to Big Pharma! These vaccinations could kill every single person who receives it, and the responsible parties will not be held liable.

Once again, I agree, the government see vaccinations differently, they also see the financial support they get from Big Pharma and their lobbying groups. Big Pharma see us as a means to make a profit. Neither really care for the individual. Yes they both KNOW and EXPECT negative reactions and people to die from their product, but they care not a jot, as they have lobbied (paid) the governments to put into law the 'we are not responsible' clause. Now THEY maybe ok with that, getting damaged just means you need more of their other products to survive (win/win for them, eh?), but tell me are YOU ok with that? Would you be ok if members of your family had a life changing reaction or even death due to a product where full disclosure of its possible effects under all circumstances was not given? Where you may be facing forced or coerced acceptance of taking this product. That cannot be taking lightly, and that is why this has become such a big deal.

That's not on this nurse. And naming and shaming her won't fix a damn thing. It does however keep people distracted and focused on all the wrong things and people, so the dirty corrupt critters can keep committing their dirty corrupt crimes against humanity.

Again I agree, it is not on the nurse if the product fails. Nobody is shaming her, naming was done by her and the media the day she took the shot on camera. The public are just trying to find the truth, which seems a little scarce on the ground so far in this case. The fact we have dirty corrupt critters commiting crimes against humanity is the very reason this nurse has been put under the public microscope, because we do not trust these scumbags to not be lying to us. It is improtant to get the whole truth, and if she is fine and doing well, one public unmasked press conference telling us all how it went, and possibly what to expect, would speak volumes to assure the rest of us that we are not being manipulated/lied to once again.

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: Boadicea

She made it everyone's business when she got the jab on tv.

BFD. Just because she let the public in on one aspect of her life doesn't give anyone the right to access to ALL of her life.

She took to the propaganda arm to show the shot was safe for the public, which is why anyone even knows of her.

Again... BFD. She did what she did. What happened, happened. Everyone will come to their own conclusions. Anyone who thinks one person's experience with the vaccine will be the same for everyone needs to be educated and informed otherwise. Forget the nurse. This individual is not important to the rest of us.

What is important? Focusing on those who are exploiting the ignorance and naivety of the people in this way. Making the case that her experience is not everyone's experience, but we can be damn sure that plenty of people will be adversely affected, regardless of any one person's experience.

You'd have to believe both she and those putting on the event are imbeciles to use someone who faints so easily, when that was the opposite of the objective.

No. I would have to believe that both she and those putting on the event think their audience are imbeciles in order to believe they would get away with this publicity stunt.

Because what kind of an imbecile would be impressed by some random person purportedly receiving a vaccination on TV?

I would very very much like to hear her side of this story, but I know I cannot demand or expect it. That's up to her to share or not.

It's the government and medical officials we need to demand answers from. And not about any one patient in particular.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: EternalShadow

So one other fainted 12 hours later...not 17 minutes later..from an allergic reaction.

So a completely different vaccine in the military means the same thing as a COVID vaccination?

Really? That’s dumber than using a nurse that passes out from pain.

Yes it was stupid to use her to show off the vaccine but the fact is, the COVID vaccine she got didn’t make her pass out, she could have gotten ANY vaccine and she could have passed out. She has even said a hangnail could be enough to make it happen.

That’s entirely my point if I wasn’t clear enough.

The COVID vaccine didn’t make her pass out.

And it didn’t kill her.

I’d be more upset at those people trying to push that agenda than at me...but hey, birds of a feather blah blah blah

yes people do in fact pas out when getting a shot,any shot. but there are two problems with that idea here. first off people like that normally pass out every time they get a shot. and so this would have been known about, and she would be the last person chosen to do a live vaccination.

second most people pass out immediately AS they get the shot, or even just seeing the needle. not minutes after getting the shot. right after suffering from confusion while speaking lines she likely rehearsed beforehand.

a reply to: generik

second most people pass out immediately AS they get the shot, or even just seeing the needle. not minutes after getting the shot. right after suffering from confusion while speaking lines she likely rehearsed beforehand.

She has an existing health issue that causes her fainting.

“I have a history of having an overactive vagal response,” she said.

With that, if I have pain from anything – a hangnail, or a stubbed toe – I can just pass out. What happened is, I get an aura before feeling weak, dizzy, disoriented and it just hit me all of a sudden.
www.thejournal.ie...

a reply to: generik

There are reports of allergic reactions directly related to the COVID vaccine. There are no reports of fainting directly related to the COVID vaccine.

Yep, it’s pretty silly to use her with her pre-existing condition, but it’s equally stupid to use a vaccine that makes people pass out minutes after getting don’t you think?

a reply to: 727Sky

Since it's been show that she's alive, and given the fact that the mainstream media would have an absolute field day reporting on this if she were really dead (The mainstream media gets more money if she's died than from debunking her death because scandal sells), I have to ask, do people here really think that she's dead, or are they just reposting the same debunked stories for fun?

If it's the former then the people seriously need to start reading some of those self help books on critical thinking because it's obvious that she's still alive if you do even the slightest bit of research, and if it's the latter then I really hope that PS5s come back in stock because people clearly have too much free time on their hands.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: generik

There are reports of allergic reactions directly related to the COVID vaccine. There are no reports of fainting directly related to the COVID vaccine.

Yep, it’s pretty silly to use her with her pre-existing condition, but it’s equally stupid to use a vaccine that makes people pass out minutes after getting don’t you think?

The anxiety of being on TV in front of the world has been known to make people faint before.

If I had a dollar for everybody who fainted opening night of a school play ...

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: 727Sky

Is this anti Vax propaganda or is the girl dead; simple question.

We’re pleased to share Tiffany Dover is doing well. Here’s a short video of her today surrounded by her colleagues who all support her.

Anti Vax propaganda.

I'm not saying she's dead but your video is bogus all the way.

1. Could be another similar girl under the mask.
2. She doesn't speak on the video.
3. The video was made by the Hospital, not her.
4. The comments section on the video is turned off.
5. The name on the ID she's wearing has 6 letters. "Tiffany" has 7 letters.

Of course they will hide the fact that she is dead to protect the implementation of the vaccine. That does not mean she is dead, only that I wouldn't doubt if they would cover it up.

Most likely the girl's immune system knew of this virus somehow and threw out a lot of histamine and other muscle chemistry that dialated her blood vessels and caused a drop in blood pressure which resulted in less blood to the brain which will make a person pass out. It could lead to some brain cells dying, giving her an IV with sodium Chloride and possibly even a little glucose in it would be a treatment since she could not drink a glass of water quickly when she got light headed.