Large explosion, buildings damaged in downtown Nashville

a reply to: MrBuddy

do you even know what a blast wave is?

and if you can show us what blew up in front of the white car. and if the blast destroyed the RV why not the white car also it was just as close. it appears to whole.

in the warning video you can see nothing is there before or after, but the RV is gone so point it out in any video what blew up.

a reply to: hounddoghowlie


My immediate reaction would be to obfuscate and deflect. You can't just blow up a building from the inside and not have questions.
Its obviously working too as MSM is all over some lone nut blowing up an RV instead of what the real story should be.
Also, I'm familiar with blast waves. If a blast is moving forward, it wouldn't veer to the left and take out a white car.
So they blew up an RV...while a megaphone is making an alert that thats whats about to happen. This leads me to believe that they wanted the focus on this rv and NOT the ATT building.
There are dozens of pics showing that the building across the street from the RV has debris which was blown OUT rather than in. The large manhole covers directly in front of that white care are blown UP and OFF their housings.
No...the real blast was intended to destroy something in that building and the RV is a red herring.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: EnhancedInterrogator

It's not actually an easy subject to learn. It took me twenty years to learn it.

Sorry if I get frustrated; it's complex, and I try to simplify it, but it's still hard to understand.

It's something which has gone on behind the scenes for nearly 80 years, and most people just don't get it.

That's why I trust what experienced/learned people (like yourself) say, when it comes to their areas of expertise. ATS is special (in part) because there is so much experience and talent contributing.

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: MrBuddy

have you watched the warning video, it shows the red suv and white car from the left side of 2nd ave, the same red suv and white car in the video. the flash comes from the right side of video and show where the fire ball in front of the white car would have been then look at the mid to upper right and you see the fire where the RV was.

there's nothing there in front of the white car.

I just started watching this video frame by frame. The first thing I have noticed is that you hear the explosion before you see the light.

What exactly does this mean? I can think of a few things. Fake, PA system sound. The one I like best is underground. If the blast started underground you could hear it before seeing light.

ETA - It goes off at 0:25.

a reply to: Bigburghi

It's not uncommon to have Google blur out names and places. We actually do it all the time for critical facilities. You just have to request Google
to obscure the information associated with the address. It's costs money, but you can get them to obscure the street view, or the overhead view.

Not hard at all, and not surprising for a CO. If you look up other CO's you will see the same thing in varying degrees.

a reply to: MrBuddy

it's plain to see you have no idea. a blast wave expands and moves in all directions unless it is a directed blast then the majority of the blast goes towards the the target if not all of it.
also if you find the aerial videos of the blast site, you will see the whole in the side of the AT&T building where the RV was parked no whole on the right side where you say the blast was, and the service tunnel doors are blown out if the blast would have came from the right side the there would be a whole somewhere, there is none.

Here is even MORE data to make the connection:

American Patriot made a tweet 4 days ago that rumors stated ATT was given a contract to do a forensic audit on Dominion voting machines located in Georgia.

www.rightjournalism.com... do-the-forensic-audit-on-the-dominion-voting-machines-and-that-they-are-transpo/

This allegation IS not substantiated as of yet thru my digging but, let's assume for a second that its true.

The former owner of the AT&T building in Nashville, William Kennard, is a board member for Cerberus Capital Management and AT&T.... He also was Bill Clinton’s FCC chair, and Obama’s Ambassador to the EU

Dominion voting is owned by Cerberus Capital Management.... Cerberus is run by Staple Street Execs. Joe Bidens Brother in Law, Steven Owens, is the cofounder of Staple Street Execs along with William Kennard (mentioned above).

Super Computer in TN was connected to the AT&T internet in NASHVILLE.... on the evening of the blast the Cumberland river cooling system was compromised due to internet outage and Supercomputer fried.....

So, the explosion “just happened” to be at the AT&T location where they “just so happen” to control the cooling system for the super computer and house the dominion voting machines and drives for forensic audit..assuming the tweet mentioned above is true.

Does it make sense now why no lives were lost? Does it make sense now why the FBI task lead couldn’t even put together a coherent sentence in the press conference yesterday? Does it make sense why the mayor was making light of the situation, almost laughing yesterday?

Granted, this is all circumstantial at best, but when compared to some lone nut blasting an RV for reasons unknown, I'll side with the speculation that its some sort of attack against whatever data was housed at that ATT facility.

Also, let us not forget that the infamous room 641A is housed in that exact same building. For those with short memories, this room came under fire in 2006 for warrantless wiretapping in California by the NSA. This room now handles the hub which included Georgia.

I mean...you can't even make this stuff up.

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

I'm not going to repeat myself over and over. My thoery has and will remain that the blast started underground AT the ATT facility.
Blast waves and other nonsense provided by people that are speculating as much as I hold no water.
What DOES hold water is all of the other information we have regarding what that site may have housed, who owned it, how that all correlates to what is happening currently concerning the election, etc.
The vid you posted shows nothing to claim otherwise. The airborne footage of the site shows nothing as well.

The facts we have far outweigh one video showing subjective material that could be argued all day without resolve. The kicker for me is that the sidewalk manhole covers in front of that white car are OFF their housings. This could only happen if at least one blast originated underground...regardless of some blast wave.

a reply to: MrBuddy

To set the stage I'm going to assume that in the video you are referring to that the white box on the left side of the street is in fact the RV. We don't know that for sure but let's go with that. I'll call this video the "white car video."

If you watch the video where you can hear the warning recording you will see that this camera is sitting above the Studio 154 sign. This black sign can be seen on the lower left. This gives us the location of the camera. I'll call this the Studio 154 Video.

Now look on the White Car video do you see the white car? That car is the same car we see in the Studio 154 Video.

We know this because we know where Studio 154 is. We know how far Studio 154 is from the crosswalk and street light and this is the same location in both videos.

In the Studio 154 Video we see explosion and we see the white car afterwards.

In fact if you watch the following NewsChannel5 helicopter flyover you will see the white car and red SUV are still there hours after the explosion.

m.youtube.com...

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Thanks

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Honestly, I understand quite a lot about explosions. They are rarely as you would expect. The first thing you have to understand is "fire" is different from a "blast". Most blasts don't have any fire at all...until seconds later. Depending on the blast, the shockwave can move so fast there is no oxygen for fire at the site of the blast, and fire will only appear at a distance where there is enough oxygen to support the fire. I've seen major blasts / explosions with no fire at all, just massive destruction. Just look at the many videos on U-toob of bombs dropped in Iraq; you seldom see fire...unless they hit something flammable on the ground.

The other types of munitions / ordnance which light off huge fireballs are hyperbaric fuel-air bombs. These bombs explode above grade and release huge amounts of flammables into the atmosphere under great pressure. When the accelerants (oxygen) rush back in after the over-pressure event there is a massive fireball which incinerates everything. The point here is, what you don't see is a massive fireball immediately after detonation.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Most blasts don't have any fire at all...until seconds later. Depending on the blast

That explains hearing the blast before seeing it, I guess.

a reply to: Bigburgh

Was it blurred out 4 days ago? If so then it isnt too strange if this is considered Infrastructure Security. It will be on a list that Google has to blur. They don't always get it right as can be seen here because ATT is seen at different angles.

If they just did it after the explosion then that's some CYA BS.

a reply to: Identified


Why is everyone stuck on this white car nonsense?? What does it matter if the car is still there or not? How does the car being there before and after the blast prove anything?
I'm not claiming the RV didn't blow up. My claim is that we have a building in the vicinity of this blast that houses a DCC connected with Dominion and current voting in Georgia. This building is owned by the big 3...Goldman, Blackstone, and Bain. This building is a subsidiary of Solar Winds...the subject of a very large Federal investigation concerning a large hack on the Pentagon in March.
Knowing what little we do about that ATT facility, I'm saying that it was the target of the blast and was ground zero. The RV is a plant designed to deflect from all of the above.
I mean, you can roll with your lone wolf nothing to see here but a suicide bombing of nothing at all. Im okay with that. For myself, that seems about as plausible as 11 Arabs with box cutters perpetuating the largest terrorist attack against the US in history.

The quitclaim at 3724 bakerton (a property said to be searched today per multiple news outlets) added Michelle in 8/2019 to the property. The property doesn’t appear to be owned by Anthony Warner though the tax record shows he paid taxes in 2019 only. Someone named Charles Steven Warner paid taxes most years along with a couple of women. Could be a family home though at the end of the day it doesn’t look from this, like Anthony Warner made a quitclaim for this property as we’ve heard some people say. Here is the current property card:

www.padctn.org...


You can see the current owner and find a copy of the quitclaim filed in 8/2019 through the hyperlink about deeds


A reply to this post (thanks for that) added that the property Anthony Warner DID quitclaim to the same Michelle in 11/2020 was at 115 bakerton, the site of the actual RV reported to police. So both of these properties were quitclaimed to Michelle S.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Most blasts don't have any fire at all...until seconds later. Depending on the blast

That explains hearing the blast before seeing it, I guess.

Could be the sound and video are out of sink. The last I checked light is faster than sound.

According to Alex Jones it was an attack on CNN. He thinks it might be a false flag but I suspect someone is attempting to getting rid of a domestic enemy of the United States. His Vote was properly recorded this time lol.

Is Nashville Bombing A False Flag To Blame On Trump Supporters?

a reply to: Leroy

The Quit claim was for his property at 115 Bakertown. The same place that was raided.

Your link is for the other property he owned on the same street.

a reply to: MrBuddy

Probably because the video you linked to has it looping after the explosion on the white vehicle while you say this started across the street from RV. What exactly are you trying to claim happened in this video you linked to if it isn't involving the white car? It's a very short video.

The white car is across and down the street from the AT&T building BTW.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Most blasts don't have any fire at all...until seconds later. Depending on the blast

That explains hearing the blast before seeing it, I guess.

Could be the sound and video are out of sink. The last I checked light is faster than sound.

According to Alex Jones it was an attack on CNN. He thinks it might be a false flag but I suspect someone is attempting to getting rid of a domestic enemy of the United States. His Vote was properly recorded this time lol.

Is Nashville Bombing A False Flag To Blame On Trump Supporters?

I was responding to FCD posting this.

Most blasts don't have any fire at all...until seconds later. Depending on the blast, the shockwave can move so fast there is no oxygen for fire at the site of the blast, and fire will only appear at a distance where there is enough oxygen to support the fire. I've seen major blasts / explosions with no fire at all, just massive destruction. Just look at the many videos on U-toob of bombs dropped in Iraq; you seldom see fire...unless they hit something flammable on the ground.

The recorded warning about detonation coming from the RV made everyone assume the bomb was in the RV. What if it was underground causing the vents and vault covers to blow upward? It makes sense that it would have been in the basement or other underground access if that is what happened.