It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
They sent me 2 ballots to my house? One was my long dead Grandma's name??????? The other had the correct name on it.
So I filled out the correct ballot and sent it too be counted. I kept the other ballot for evidence. I also kept the outer envelope on the correct ballot that I sent in. A typical leftist nut job would have more than likely, sent in both to vote twice!
When I check online..........It shows that the one I didn't send in was counted. The correct ballot with my true name was not counted???????????????????????????
Plus I am unable to see how my votes for the candidates were recorded. I don't trust today's $hit people to begin with. If I can't verify my vote somehow...... I'm sure some fraud group of criminals will surely take advantage.
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: network dude
what was the process for signature verification in the Georgia recount?
No clue. I work Texas elections, not Georgia elections.
The point is, people who work Georgia elections and people who are involved in Georgia elections are members of both parties. They verified the signatures. In order for there to be a large number of frauds, EVERY SINGLE PERSON in that chain has to be in on it.
Why aren't there thousands of election workers screaming 'foul!' about this? Not two. Not three. Not 'alleged'... why aren't there hundreds or thousands of them protesting with court-acceptable evidence?
What's wrong with two or three people? At least we know who they are. The media hears a minor piece of dirt on Trump from an anonymous source and runs the story constantly until another one comes up. Now suddenly more than one eye witness is not enough?
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
They sent me 2 ballots to my house? One was my long dead Grandma's name??????? The other had the correct name on it.
So I filled out the correct ballot and sent it too be counted. I kept the other ballot for evidence. I also kept the outer envelope on the correct ballot that I sent in. A typical leftist nut job would have more than likely, sent in both to vote twice!
When I check online..........It shows that the one I didn't send in was counted. The correct ballot with my true name was not counted???????????????????????????
Plus I am unable to see how my votes for the candidates were recorded. I don't trust today's $hit people to begin with. If I can't verify my vote somehow...... I'm sure some fraud group of criminals will surely take advantage.
I would have sent both of them. F the democrats. They're playing games.
In a news release Friday, Raffensperger called for the poll managers he claimed were fired, Suzi Voyles and Bridget Thorne, to be allowed to work future elections. They served as poll managers last month and had done so in the past, as well.
The secretary claimed they raised concerns about the execution of the election. He said it's important for Georgians to feel they can speak up if they feel they've seen any wrongdoings.
“I condemn in the strongest terms the decision by Fulton County elections officials to fire two poll managers purely for raising concerns about the November elections,” said Raffensperger in the statement.
“Though we have found no credible evidence of widespread fraud, it is important that individuals can raise their voice when they believe they have seen wrongdoing. Retribution against whistleblowers poses a threat to the continued strength and vibrancy of our democracy," he added.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Gnawledge
originally posted by: Nodrak
originally posted by: Gnawledge
Why just 98%?
Also photocopies wouldn't work, they are barcoded. That stack of ballots is as legit as McEnany's stack of blank papers she touts as proof of fraud.
Security features only matter if they are checked with rigor or purpose...
It's fed into a machine that reads barcodes. Machines read the same barcode, machine rejects a duplicate. It's a pretty good security feature.
Combined with the ability for the scanning software running on the machine to "error out" requiring a rescan, you feed in the duplicate ballot that has Biden checked instead of the original Trump ballot.
Yeah, really secure.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Gnawledge
there were stories of ballots being run several times, and "adjudicating" the batch to allow them through. I don't know if that's true or can be done, but it was claimed. That would eliminate the safety of the bar code.
And please don't misunderstand my position in all this. I like Trump, but only want to see a truthful election. If Biden won fair and square, then all it good. there just seemed to be a whole lot of ambiguity and strangeness. the truth isn't subjective.
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: network dude
what was the process for signature verification in the Georgia recount?
No clue. I work Texas elections, not Georgia elections.
The point is, people who work Georgia elections and people who are involved in Georgia elections are members of both parties. They verified the signatures. In order for there to be a large number of frauds, EVERY SINGLE PERSON in that chain has to be in on it.
Why aren't there thousands of election workers screaming 'foul!' about this? Not two. Not three. Not 'alleged'... why aren't there hundreds or thousands of them protesting with court-acceptable evidence?
What's wrong with two or three people? At least we know who they are. The media hears a minor piece of dirt on Trump from an anonymous source and runs the story constantly until another one comes up. Now suddenly more than one eye witness is not enough?
And it's always an unidentified whistle blower from the leftists.
System working as intended. Fulton County government is also looking into the ladies' dismissal, although, one must point out that poll manager is not a full-time position. Kinda blows a hole in the whole "nobody cares" theme, I know, but the facts are the facts.
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
There is ZERO evidence that the election was not compromised by MASSIVE and widespread fraud on behalf of the dEmocrat party
Obvious is obvious
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: MayRenee
How the fraudsters are controlling who looks at them?
Some have said there's a barcode but are the barcodes being read into a piece of software the sees it and is programmed to allow the code?
Do the human counters know how to read a barcode on a re-count?
originally posted by: Nodrak
originally posted by: Gnawledge
Why just 98%?
Also photocopies wouldn't work, they are barcoded. That stack of ballots is as legit as McEnany's stack of blank papers she touts as proof of fraud.
Security features only matter if they are checked with rigor or purpose...
originally posted by: Gnawledge
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Gnawledge
there were stories of ballots being run several times, and "adjudicating" the batch to allow them through. I don't know if that's true or can be done, but it was claimed. That would eliminate the safety of the bar code.
And please don't misunderstand my position in all this. I like Trump, but only want to see a truthful election. If Biden won fair and square, then all it good. there just seemed to be a whole lot of ambiguity and strangeness. the truth isn't subjective.
I don't know if that's true either, if it is, it's mass fraud. But I've seen no such evidence. People are claiming everything under the sun about this election. But claims are like opinions and that other thing we all have.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
This would be possibly the largest and most far reaching conspiracy in us history.