It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Stupid thing about all this is that it will boomerand and we will end up seeing real racisim making a come back out of this idiotic attempt to virtue signal their purity.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MykeNukem
Exodus is contained within the Torah and was incorporated into the Christian Bible, thus the religions involved are Judaism and Christianity.
I'm always hearing, particularly, believe that the BIble is the Express Word of God and each part must be obeyed.
Therefore, reasonably, someone with that believe should understand that the crimes resulting from slavery persist.
Not my area, really.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MykeNukem
It's not my area because I'm not a believer in either religion.
Slavery is an unspeakable act. There are folks alive today whose families directly either held slaves or advocated for slavery.
Were I a believer in such concepts as "the inspired word" I would understand that I am responsible for the wrong-doing of my ancestors back at least four generations, as so many folks are glad to claim their religious beliefs controll all aspects of their daily lives.
If this told you anything about my character, you're welcome. I suspect however the only thing that happened is that you ahve a preconceived notion that your blatant misunderstanding confirmed for you.
Besides that your feelz are irrelevant to the matter at hand. Best.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: CryHavoc
The idea that the "sins of the father shall be visited upon the sons" is actually pre-Biblical. It can be thought of in active terms -- as in "the sons will be punished by conscious and willful actions of others," or it can be thought of in passive terms, as in "the sons will be affected by the sins of the father."
This isn't a new concept. It's just being re-visited within the context of critical race theory.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Stupid thing about all this is that it will boomerand and we will end up seeing real racisim making a come back out of this idiotic attempt to virtue signal their purity.
Too late.
People carrying the symbols of white nationalism into a public park, instigating mayhem, and then having the President of the United States say plainly that both sides are equally "good people" ... I think we can safely say that the box is opened.
(Unless you can explain that white nationalism isn't racist of course, go right ahead.)
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Yes, the narrative that White folks are the superior paragons of the world is quite old. It was used to justify a few centuries of colonization.
I love it that folks can even write down that white folks are the best, better than all the rest (Black, Brown, etc.) and deserve all they have, are the richest and smartest and most qualified ... and yet, at the same time, victimized and hunted to extinction ...
... you can't make crap like this up.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Yes, the narrative that White folks are the superior paragons of the world is quite old. It was used to justify a few centuries of colonization.
I love it that folks can even write down that white folks are the best, better than all the rest (Black, Brown, etc.) and deserve all they have, are the richest and smartest and most qualified ... and yet, at the same time, victimized and hunted to extinction ...
... you can't make crap like this up.
So you DO believe that the sins of the father's SHOULD be visited on their ancestors?
So in that sense, you ARE a believer I guess? Confusing.
Does this apply to all people? Or just one race?
What's the definition of that?