AMA rescinds stance on Hydroxychloroquine

Ditto.

a reply to: andy06shake

Well, biden won now so I guess they will quit bashing anything Trump said now since he is going to be gone in a month.

See how bad Trump is, he got media and the Democrat to spread lies about anything he said. It is Trump's fault that these people lie and twist things, their TDS is trump's fault. Just don't expect MSM to stop their lies, they know they can get away with it and will bash the Democrats if they ever raise anything against them. They have hit the pinata with a bat and the pinata is actually a hornets nest.

a reply to: Athetos

The difference being I'm not lightly to ingest anything willingly that could kill me or make me unwell down to the ramblings of raving lunatics and witchdoctors with an agenda on the telly.

Aside from Sugar of course.

I think HCQ is good drug specially for early treatment .


HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: meta analysis of 171 studies


There is war against cheap effective drugs, and same time they lie about other much more expensive drugs like
Remdesivir .

Remdesivir Is a Scam Like Tamiflu



No doubt many have died because did not get good early treatment like HCQ or ivermectin .


The estimated number of human lives lost from incorrect HCQ advice is:

a reply to: andy06shake

For a start, the study cited in that article talks about people who received hydroxychloroquine after being hospitalized with Covid-19. I've seen several studies and a meta-study claim hydroxychloroquine does work if taken early and in conjunction with things like zinc. I've also seen several other studies which said hydroxychloroquine did nothing be withdrawn because they were found to be highly flawed. I've seen dozens of doctors passionately claim they know for a fact that hydroxychloroquine works because they've used it on hundreds of patients and we know from experience it helps with SARS-type illnesses. The demonization of hydroxychloroquine was just another pathetic lie in this whole scam to keep Covid-19 fearmongering going as long as possible and the people participating in it disgust me.

Well if you don’t listen to your telly your half way there and we are more similar then we are different. Even if we disagree on one or two things.

a reply to: andy06shake

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

And this thread is hoax.

a reply to: Kenzo

Actually, Remdesivir shows some merit by blocking the virus from copying itself.

Trials of the drug showed that it can cut recovery time by nearly a third in people with severe COVID-19.

www.nih.gov...

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

For a start, paragraphs might be nice.

I disagree as to the merits of Hydroxychloroquine.

From what ive read the computer says "No".

a reply to: andy06shake

Lol, never question my ability to form paragraphs, just wasn't enough text to bother breaking it up. And I'm pretty certain that the only thing you've read is mainstream articles trying to prove Trump wrong. Their fantasy land logic doesn't change reality.

a reply to: andy06shake


I think Remdesivir is just hype, the MSM and rest of the cartel people pushed Remdesivir just for other reasons...

We get it Phage people who disagree with you are liars and hoaxers. There is no conspiracy around drug companies and Covid or the government and everyone tells the truth all the time especially if they are a doctor and hold a PHD because science. I understand this to be the world you live in but we do not share it. People lie especially scientists. Why do they do it? The money. That glorious grant money oh and prestige.
a reply to: Phage

originally posted by: Athetos
RESOLVED, that our AMA reassure the patients whose physicians are prescribing hydroxychloroquine and combination therapies for their early-stage COVID-19 diagnosis by issuing an updated statement clarifying our support for a physician’s ability to prescribe an FDA-approved medication for off label use, if it is in her/his best clinical judgement, with specific reference to the use of hydroxychloroquine and combination therapies for the treatment of the earliest stage of COVID-19; (New HOD Policy) and be it further.

Page 15 of the link.
www.ama-assn.org...

So what’s everyone’s hot take in this issue now? Is it good? Is it’s bad? Did they lie to you again when there was a cheap and readily available solution?
I seen many people get on soap boxes and proclaim how dangerous the drug Is and how it should be banned both on here and other media.

So what do you all think? My take is yes this whole pandemic is engineered to be as bad as possible(or appear far worse then reality) with real help stone walled, fake feel good help is made into law.

Why did the media attack this drug so vigorously?

Thanks for posting this, it's good news suggesting the end might be near for this Grand Illusion we've all had to endure.

The media attacks HQC because the media's largest single advertiser is Big Pharma, and because the patent on HQC expired many years ago, they make very little profit on the sale of it. Plus, the media is heavily invested in the Official Narrative of Fear, and if it became known by the fearful public that things really aren't as bad as they've been portrayed to be, the narrative monkey would die, and the people would come to their senses.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

Then use paragraphs. x

As to fantasy land logic.

Well, i think that's Donald's department.

The articles i have read pertaining to the subject probably are of the mainstream variety, whats your claim to fame there, or how are you and different?

And i will question what i like thanks very much, just like yourself i am perfectly free to do so. x

a reply to: Kenzo

Each to their own Kenzo.

Have to say though, there is far more evidence to support the use of Remdesivir where COVID 19 is concerned, being of a beneficial nature, than there is the use of Hydroxychloroquine.

UK regulators have said there is enough evidence to approve the use of Remdesivir for selected Covid-19 hospital patients.

When did scientists and doctors become MSM?

a reply to: Athetos

Your thread title and premise are false. The AMA did not rescind its stance.

Nope. They did though.

a reply to: Athetos

Source?
The link in your OP does not indicate that the proposed resolution was adopted.

Duh, it was deemed bad because Trump said it was good.

If he had said it was bad, then every MD in the US would have prescribed it immediately for COVID.

That's the way the US works now, haven't you caught on yet.

Of course, everything Biden says will be like words dripping from the mouth of God and he will be able to do no wrong.

That the way it will be in the next 4 years as the economy tanks and the nation falls apart. It will just be the "new normal" that Obama said we all darn well better get used to.

a reply to: Athetos

Now they have to contend with the news about Ivermectin. I can't believe the official word out of government from any source any more.
I wonder how many people they killed by objecting to using hydroxychloroquine up to now? Our federal government is overdue for a reset.