It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Drucifer
THIS is different.
It certainly looks different. Staid layout, corporate-style fonts, went-to-college writing style.
Closer inspection, however, proves it another piece of partisan fake news. See Phage’s posts above.
Also, this.
And this
The Allied Security Operations Group is a cobbled-together gang that exists only to propagate this very lie.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: DontTreadOnMe
I'm sorry. Just seems really dumb to release this now.
"Yea, about that fraud thing, I guess it's real and maybe we should have listened. Better luck next time."
originally posted by: elementalgrove
This is what Sidney Powell, Rudy, and Lin have been shouting about.
How many machines could have this same issue.
originally posted by: slatesteam
Man if only I could recall why 12/14/20 is significant with regards to this tumultuous and questionable election...
originally posted by: slatesteam
a reply to: CIAGypsy
Why not treason? I’m not sure how that crime works, but it seems like US election tampering or corruption should fall under that consequence too maybe?
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: DontTreadOnMe
Am I missing something?
Trump got more votes after the 'flip'. It's in the report.
originally posted by: CIAGypsy
Btw, I reached out to several Republican members of congress in both the House and Senate and asked WHY they are not doing forensics on Dominion machines in Republican states such as Florida, Tennessee, Alaska, Nebraska, Iowa, etc...which might corroborate the fraud that was seen in swing states? Powell had mentioned weeks ago that the Dominion software was likely changing votes across all states where it was used. Why are Republicans not gathering this evidence with the support of Congress personnel in those states to validate those beliefs?
originally posted by: jrod
You do realize most cases of voting fraud in recent times were carried out by Republicans?
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
Dominion was used in the other states with questionable results. The way to turn the election was to run this compromised system in Democratic strongholds, places where there would be a lot of Biden votes anyway.
If they did this in hard red areas, it would be obvious fraud, even to CNN.
originally posted by: chr0naut
For instance, in 81% of swing state counties where Dominion machines were used, the vote went to Trump. If the Democrats were cheating, it was to give votes to Trump, based upon actual results.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: chr0naut
I guess you're missing the point.
The Dominion System was/is compromised to allow fraud.
It was caught in Antrim county.
Then the security files disappeared.
The same system with the same program was used in Wayne County, all of Michigan.
Dominion was used in the other states with questionable results. The way to turn the election was to run this compromised system in Democratic strongholds, places where there would be a lot of Biden votes anyway.
If they did this in hard red areas, it would be obvious fraud, even to CNN.
Yes, the Dominion machines were old and insecure.
But was there any instance of cheating using them?
For instance, in 81% of swing state counties where Dominion machines were used, the vote went to Trump. If the Democrats were cheating, it was to give votes to Trump, based upon actual results.
Swing-state counties that used Dominion voting machines mostly voted for Trump
The narrative of the "stolen election" isn't supported by the facts in the case of swing state counties using Dominion machines.
originally posted by: jrod
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: chr0naut
I guess you're missing the point.
The Dominion System was/is compromised to allow fraud.
It was caught in Antrim county.
Then the security files disappeared.
The same system with the same program was used in Wayne County, all of Michigan.
Dominion was used in the other states with questionable results. The way to turn the election was to run this compromised system in Democratic strongholds, places where there would be a lot of Biden votes anyway.
If they did this in hard red areas, it would be obvious fraud, even to CNN.
Yes, the Dominion machines were old and insecure.
But was there any instance of cheating using them?
For instance, in 81% of swing state counties where Dominion machines were used, the vote went to Trump. If the Democrats were cheating, it was to give votes to Trump, based upon actual results.
Swing-state counties that used Dominion voting machines mostly voted for Trump
The narrative of the "stolen election" isn't supported by the facts in the case of swing state counties using Dominion machines.
Why are the same people who are so worried about fraud, not concerned about Florida, North Carolina and Texas?
Florida had a massive vote dump that favored Trump, North Carolina was accepting ballots up to a week after the election(which is ok if those ballots only favors Trump?), and then we have Texas where the Diebold(now called Premier) voting machines were used. Diebold has a history of fraud and security questions.
Why not scrutinize the vote in those states?
It is as if, some of you are only concerned about overturning states that voted for Biden and ignore discrepancies that favored Trump!
originally posted by: Phage
The "audit report" comes from Russell James Ramsland Jr., the guy who didn't know the difference between Minnesota and Michigan. I'll wait for a second opinion thank you. He's had other problems with getting his facts straight.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DontTreadOnMe
How do you square your concerns with Dominion with the fact that 81% of the counties that Trump won were using Dominion systems?
Why are we only concerned with fraud when Trump lost?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: tanstaafl
Are you familiar with the process of adjudication?
It's state law in Georgia and most other states.
As opposed to the lady in Coffee County that got caught trying to submit Trump votes twice,
the fact of the matter is that all adjuication takes place before a committee made up of Demorats, Republicans and Independents.
Don't believe everything you see on Youtube.
Ramsland was only one of many involved in the audit and production of the report.
Spyder, it turns out, is Joshua Merritt, a 43-year-old information technology consultant in the Dallas area.