The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

They have not seen violence yet if that is all they have for comparison.

SCOTUS ignored a significant coup attempt.

Our Constitution has won out again.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
SCOTUS ignored a significant coup attempt.

Our Constitution has won out again.

How? State dont follow the constitution and skips the legislature to change laws to make cheating easy.
But that scool. guess we just have to hack and cheat next time too.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Gryphon66
SCOTUS ignored a significant coup attempt.

Our Constitution has won out again.

How? State dont follow the constitution and skips the legislature to change laws to make cheating easy.
But that scool. guess we just have to hack and cheat next time too.

States did follow the Constitution and their own laws.

The "changes" to the laws were made in all 50 states.

Are you really claiming that for example Pennsylvania extending their mail in ballot deadline by three days, cutting off anything postmarked after Eleciton day, keeping those ballots separated and finding that those ballots (which had no issues) didn't change the results of the election ... tell me how that is blown up to some expansive States are not following the Constuttion.

IN fact, the Supreme Court upheld the Constution today. We are a nation composed of sovereign states. No State is going to dictate the laws of another state.

And let's face it ... as a very few honest Trump supporters have admitted over the last few weeks ... they don't care about anything except Trump being the next President.

Time to stop denying reality.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Constituion dictates Nov 3. No days after,or next. Broke the law. they only deserve a traitors death.

a reply to: yuppa

Incorrect. Election day isn't established in the Constitution, it was set up by Congress in 1845.

There used to be a 34 day window for voting.

We're in the midst of an unprecedented pandemic. Your argument boils down to a distaste for Americans having their votes counted. If there were a higher proportion of fraudulent votes you might have a point, but that hasn't been demonstrated in the least.

originally posted by: Bob Sholtz
a reply to: yuppa

Incorrect. Election day isn't established in the Constitution, it was set up by Congress in 1845.

There used to be a 34 day window for voting.

We're in the midst of an unprecedented pandemic. Your argument boils down to a distaste for Americans having their votes counted. If there were a higher proportion of fraudulent votes you might have a point, but that hasn't been demonstrated in the least.

It was AMENDED was it not? then it is law correct? now go sit down.

a reply to: yuppa

What ballots were submitted after election day?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: yuppa

What ballots were submitted after election day?

The ones after midnight on election night.

a reply to: yuppa

Which are those?

Oh, I see. You think "tabulated" is the same as submitted. It is isn't.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: yuppa

Which are those?

Oh, I see. You think "tabulated" is the same as submitted. It is isn't.

All previous elections,counting stopped at midnight,regardless or leftover votes.

a reply to: yuppa

All previous elections,counting stopped at midnight

False.

That just isn't true and you know it. a reply to: yuppa

MAJOR UPDATE

Attorney Sidney Powell is resubmitting the Texas case in 4 parts, customized for Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin as individual defendants.

The 4 submissions will demonstrate Constitutional violations, and contain solid evidence of massive election fraud, as well.

The Texas case against these 4 states was turned down yesterday by the Supreme Court, due to lack of STANDING. (i.e. Texas wasn't damaged by any laws broken in PA-GA-MI-WI)

However, The Plaintiff(s) of these 4 cases submitted by Sidney Powell WILL have standing.

For that reason, the SCOTUS will be forced to look at the Evidence, instead of discarding these cases based on lack of standing.

Tweet from Ms. Powell last night: twitter.com...

Go Sidney!

a reply to: carewemust

Why do you persist in spamming multiple threads with nothingness?

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: yuppa

Which are those?

Oh, I see. You think "tabulated" is the same as submitted. It is isn't.

All previous elections,counting stopped at midnight,regardless or leftover votes.

This isn't true. I've worked as an election judge in Texas. Some of our polling stations (presidential election) didn't turn in their ballots until 3 am (I know this because I helped out a judge who had to close a large polling station and we didn't get finished until 2 am.)

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: yuppa

Which are those?

Oh, I see. You think "tabulated" is the same as submitted. It is isn't.

All previous elections,counting stopped at midnight,regardless or leftover votes.

No it didn't, never has. Counting goes on through the night.

originally posted by: carewemust
MAJOR UPDATE

Attorney Sidney Powell is resubmitting the Texas case in 4 parts, customized for Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin as individual defendants.

The 4 submissions will demonstrate Constitutional violations, and contain solid evidence of massive election fraud, as well.

The Texas case against these 4 states was turned down yesterday by the Supreme Court, due to lack of STANDING. (i.e. Texas wasn't damaged by any laws broken in PA-GA-MI-WI)

However, The Plaintiff(s) of these 4 cases submitted by Sidney Powell WILL have standing.

For that reason, the SCOTUS will be forced to look at the Evidence, instead of discarding these cases based on lack of standing.

Tweet from Ms. Powell last night: twitter.com...

Go Sidney!

Thank you for informing us of the next case to fail. You really need a better hobby...

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: yuppa

Which are those?

Oh, I see. You think "tabulated" is the same as submitted. It is isn't.

All previous elections,counting stopped at midnight,regardless or leftover votes.

This is just not true.

originally posted by: carewemust
MAJOR UPDATE

Attorney Sidney Powell is resubmitting the Texas case in 4 parts, customized for Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin as individual defendants.

The 4 submissions will demonstrate Constitutional violations, and contain solid evidence of massive election fraud, as well.

The Texas case against these 4 states was turned down yesterday by the Supreme Court, due to lack of STANDING. (i.e. Texas wasn't damaged by any laws broken in PA-GA-MI-WI)

However, The Plaintiff(s) of these 4 cases submitted by Sidney Powell WILL have standing.

For that reason, the SCOTUS will be forced to look at the Evidence, instead of discarding these cases based on lack of standing.

Tweet from Ms. Powell last night: twitter.com...

Go Sidney!

Sidney Powell??? The crazy lady who thinks that Hugo Chavez is behind everything, presumably via an Ouija board? This will go nowhere and will be overtaken by the Electoral College meeting on Monday and making Biden's victory official. It's over. Trump needs to start helping Melania with the move back to Florida, as she's apparently long since already seen reality and started to pack up.